1,835 research outputs found
An assertion language for constraint logic programs
In an advanced program development environment, such as that discussed in the introduction of this book, several tools may coexist which handle both the program and information on the program in different ways. Also, these tools may interact among themselves and with the user. Thus, the different tools and the user need some way to communicate. It is our design principie that such communication be performed in terms of assertions. Assertions are syntactic objects which allow expressing properties of programs. Several assertion languages have been used in the past in different contexts, mainly related to program debugging. In this chapter we propose a general language of assertions which is used in different tools for validation and debugging of constraint logic programs in the context of the DiSCiPl project. The assertion language proposed is parametric w.r.t. the particular constraint domain and properties of interest being used in each different tool. The language proposed is quite general in that it poses few restrictions on the kind of properties which may be expressed. We believe the assertion language we propose is of practical relevance and appropriate for the different uses required in the tools considered
Verification of Imperative Programs by Constraint Logic Program Transformation
We present a method for verifying partial correctness properties of
imperative programs that manipulate integers and arrays by using techniques
based on the transformation of constraint logic programs (CLP). We use CLP as a
metalanguage for representing imperative programs, their executions, and their
properties. First, we encode the correctness of an imperative program, say
prog, as the negation of a predicate 'incorrect' defined by a CLP program T. By
construction, 'incorrect' holds in the least model of T if and only if the
execution of prog from an initial configuration eventually halts in an error
configuration. Then, we apply to program T a sequence of transformations that
preserve its least model semantics. These transformations are based on
well-known transformation rules, such as unfolding and folding, guided by
suitable transformation strategies, such as specialization and generalization.
The objective of the transformations is to derive a new CLP program TransfT
where the predicate 'incorrect' is defined either by (i) the fact 'incorrect.'
(and in this case prog is not correct), or by (ii) the empty set of clauses
(and in this case prog is correct). In the case where we derive a CLP program
such that neither (i) nor (ii) holds, we iterate the transformation. Since the
problem is undecidable, this process may not terminate. We show through
examples that our method can be applied in a rather systematic way, and is
amenable to automation by transferring to the field of program verification
many techniques developed in the field of program transformation.Comment: In Proceedings Festschrift for Dave Schmidt, arXiv:1309.455
Generalization Strategies for the Verification of Infinite State Systems
We present a method for the automated verification of temporal properties of
infinite state systems. Our verification method is based on the specialization
of constraint logic programs (CLP) and works in two phases: (1) in the first
phase, a CLP specification of an infinite state system is specialized with
respect to the initial state of the system and the temporal property to be
verified, and (2) in the second phase, the specialized program is evaluated by
using a bottom-up strategy. The effectiveness of the method strongly depends on
the generalization strategy which is applied during the program specialization
phase. We consider several generalization strategies obtained by combining
techniques already known in the field of program analysis and program
transformation, and we also introduce some new strategies. Then, through many
verification experiments, we evaluate the effectiveness of the generalization
strategies we have considered. Finally, we compare the implementation of our
specialization-based verification method to other constraint-based model
checking tools. The experimental results show that our method is competitive
with the methods used by those other tools. To appear in Theory and Practice of
Logic Programming (TPLP).Comment: 24 pages, 2 figures, 5 table
Abstract verification and debugging of constraint logic programs
The technique of Abstract Interpretation [13] has allowed the development of sophisticated program analyses which are provably correct and practical. The semantic approximations produced by such analyses have been traditionally applied to optimization during program compilation. However, recently, novel and promising applications of semantic approximations have been proposed in the more general context of program verification and debugging [3],[10],[7]
Using global analysis, partial specifications, and an extensible assertion language for program validation and debugging
We discuss a framework for the application of abstract interpretation as an aid during program development, rather than in the more traditional application of program optimization. Program validation and detection of errors is first performed statically by comparing (partial) specifications written in terms of assertions against information obtained from (global) static analysis of the program. The results of this process are expressed in the user assertion language. Assertions (or parts of assertions) which cannot be checked statically are translated into run-time tests. The framework allows the use of assertions to be optional. It also allows using very general properties in assertions, beyond the predefined set understandable by the static analyzer and including properties defined by user programs. We also report briefly on an implementation of the framework. The resulting tool generates and checks assertions for Prolog, CLP(R), and CHIP/CLP(fd) programs, and integrates compile-time and run-time checking in a uniform way. The tool allows using properties such as types, modes, non-failure, determinacy,
and computational cost, and can treat modules separately, performing incremental analysis
An Approach to Static Performance Guarantees for Programs with Run-time Checks
Instrumenting programs for performing run-time checking of properties, such
as regular shapes, is a common and useful technique that helps programmers
detect incorrect program behaviors. This is specially true in dynamic languages
such as Prolog. However, such run-time checks inevitably introduce run-time
overhead (in execution time, memory, energy, etc.). Several approaches have
been proposed for reducing such overhead, such as eliminating the checks that
can statically be proved to always succeed, and/or optimizing the way in which
the (remaining) checks are performed. However, there are cases in which it is
not possible to remove all checks statically (e.g., open libraries which must
check their interfaces, complex properties, unknown code, etc.) and in which,
even after optimizations, these remaining checks still may introduce an
unacceptable level of overhead. It is thus important for programmers to be able
to determine the additional cost due to the run-time checks and compare it to
some notion of admissible cost. The common practice used for estimating
run-time checking overhead is profiling, which is not exhaustive by nature.
Instead, we propose a method that uses static analysis to estimate such
overhead, with the advantage that the estimations are functions parameterized
by input data sizes. Unlike profiling, this approach can provide guarantees for
all possible execution traces, and allows assessing how the overhead grows as
the size of the input grows. Our method also extends an existing assertion
verification framework to express "admissible" overheads, and statically and
automatically checks whether the instrumented program conforms with such
specifications. Finally, we present an experimental evaluation of our approach
that suggests that our method is feasible and promising.Comment: 15 pages, 3 tables; submitted to ICLP'18, accepted as technical
communicatio
Test Case Generation for Object-Oriented Imperative Languages in CLP
Testing is a vital part of the software development process. Test Case
Generation (TCG) is the process of automatically generating a collection of
test cases which are applied to a system under test. White-box TCG is usually
performed by means of symbolic execution, i.e., instead of executing the
program on normal values (e.g., numbers), the program is executed on symbolic
values representing arbitrary values. When dealing with an object-oriented (OO)
imperative language, symbolic execution becomes challenging as, among other
things, it must be able to backtrack, complex heap-allocated data structures
should be created during the TCG process and features like inheritance, virtual
invocations and exceptions have to be taken into account. Due to its inherent
symbolic execution mechanism, we pursue in this paper that Constraint Logic
Programming (CLP) has a promising unexploited application field in TCG. We will
support our claim by developing a fully CLP-based framework to TCG of an OO
imperative language, and by assessing it on a corresponding implementation on a
set of challenging Java programs. A unique characteristic of our approach is
that it handles all language features using only CLP and without the need of
developing specific constraint operators (e.g., to model the heap)
Using parametric set constraints for locating errors in CLP programs
This paper introduces a framework of parametric descriptive directional types
for constraint logic programming (CLP). It proposes a method for locating type
errors in CLP programs and presents a prototype debugging tool. The main
technique used is checking correctness of programs w.r.t. type specifications.
The approach is based on a generalization of known methods for proving
correctness of logic programs to the case of parametric specifications.
Set-constraint techniques are used for formulating and checking verification
conditions for (parametric) polymorphic type specifications. The specifications
are expressed in a parametric extension of the formalism of term grammars. The
soundness of the method is proved and the prototype debugging tool supporting
the proposed approach is illustrated on examples.
The paper is a substantial extension of the previous work by the same authors
concerning monomorphic directional types.Comment: 64 pages, To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programmin
- âŠ