Computed Tomography of the Coronary Arteries

Non-invasive coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has become an important tool for visualisation of coronary arteries since the introduction of 64-channel detector CCTA in 2004. It has been proved to be especially beneficial for ruling out coronary artery disease (CAD) in selected patient populations, due to the high negative predictive value (NPV). The aim of this thesis was to study some aspects of the introduction, establishment and development of a new method, retrospectively ECG-gated CCTA with 64-channel detector, to evaluate coronary arteries. In study I the diagnostic capacity and limitation of CCTA was compared to that of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in a newly established CCTA team. CCTA had a very high NPV but the number of non-diagnostic scans was also high. The main limitations were motion artifacts and vessel calcifications, while short experience in reading CCTA did not affect image interpretation. Study II described the learning-curve effect of the interpretation of 100 CCTA and also compared the diagnostic accuracy of both radiologists and radiographers, after a common introduction. The review time for novices was approximately halved during the first 100 cases, with maintained diagnostic accuracy. There was a learning-curve effect in positive predictive value (PPV) for radiologists, but not for the radiographers. However, the diagnostic accuracy of dedicated radiographers indicated that they might be considered as part of the evaluation team. Study III compared the radiation exposure in retrospectively ECG-gated CCTA and ICA in the same population. Both mean estimated effective dose (ED) and organ doses (skin, breast, lung and oesophagus) were higher in CCTA when compared to ICA. The relatively high radiation dose to breast indicates that bismuth shielding should be used in women when performing CCTA. When using the updated tissue weighting factors provided in ICRP 103 the calculated ED from CCTA were significantly higher than those obtained using outdated ICRP 60. In study IV the image quality and radiation doses were compared when decreasing X-ray tube peak kilovoltage (kVp) from 120 to 100 kVp in patients undergoing CCTA. By reduction of tube voltage the radiation dose was almost halved while the diagnostic image quality was kept at a clinically acceptable level. In conclusion, CCTA is increasingly available throughout the world as an alternative to gold standard ICA, especially due to the excellent capability to rule out CAD. Still, retrospectively ECG-gated 64-channel detector CCTA has limitations such as motion artifacts and vessel calcifications. Another limitation is the high radiation doses required for CCTA compared to ICA. By lowering the kVp from traditionally 120 kVp to 100 kVp the radiation dose is halved while retaining diagnostic accuracy. There is a learning curve effect (regarded PPV and review time) of the interpretation of CCTA. However, more than 100 reviewed CCTA cases are necessary to reach a diagnostic accuracy that is acceptable

Reduction of radiation dose for coronary computed tomography angiography using prospective electrocardiography-triggered high-pitch acquisition in clinical routine

Purpose: To evaluate the image quality, radiation exposure, and means of application in a group of patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) performed with low-dose prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-triggered acquisition in which a standard sequence was added if the low-dose sequence did not allow reliable exclusion of coronary stenosis with respect to image quality. Material and methods: The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. The authors performed a retrospective review of 256 consecutive patients referred for CCTA using dual-source CT scanner (Definition FLASH, Siemens, Germany). CCTA was performed using prospective ECG-triggered high-pitch acquisition. In patients with higher heart rates (> 65 bpm) or in whom irregular heart rates were noted prior to the scan, a subsequent CCTA was performed immediately (double flash protocol). The effective radiation dose was calculated for each patient. All images were evaluated by two independent observers for quality on a four-point scale with 1 being non-diagnostic image quality and 4 being excellent. Results: Mean effective whole-body dose of CCTA was 1.6 ± 0.4 mSv (range, 0.4-5.4) for the entire cardiac examination and 0.9 ± 0.3 mSv (range, 0.4-2.8) for individual prospective ECG-triggered high-pitch CCTAs. In 27 of these patients with higher heart rates or occasional premature ventricular contractions or atrial fibrillation, subsequent CCTAs were performed immediately. The average image quality score was good to excellent with less than 1% unevaluable coronary segments. The double flash protocol resulted in a fully diagnostic CCTA in all cases. Conclusions: The prospective ECG-triggered high-pitch CCTA technique is feasible and promising in clinical routine with good to excellent image quality and minimal radiation dose. The double flash protocol might become a more robust tool in patients with higher heart rates or arrhythmia

Electron beam computed tomography for the diagnosis of cardiac disease

No Abstract

Combined Coronary CT-Angiography and TAVI-Planning: A Contrast-Neutral Routine Approach for Ruling-Out Significant Coronary Artery Disease

Background: Significant coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common finding in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Assessment of CAD prior to TAVI is recommended by current guidelines and is mainly performed via invasive coronary angiography (ICA). In this study we analyzed the ability of coronary CT-angiography (cCTA) to rule out significant CAD (stenosis ≥ 50%) during routine pre-TAVI evaluation in patients with high pre-test probability for CAD. Methods: In total, 460 consecutive patients undergoing pre-TAVI CT (mean age 79.6 ± 7.4 years) were included. All patients were examined with a retrospectively ECG-gated CT-scan of the heart, followed by a high-pitch-scan of the vascular access route utilizing a single intravenous bolus of 70 mL iodinated contrast medium. Images were evaluated for image quality, calcifications, and significant CAD; CT-examinations in which CAD could not be ruled out were defined as positive (CAD+). Routinely, patients received ICA (388/460; 84.3%; Group A), which was omitted if renal function was impaired and CAD was ruled out on cCTA (Group B). Following TAVI, clinical events were documented during the hospital stay. Results: cCTA was negative for CAD in 40.2% (188/460). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in Group A were 97.8%, 45.2%, 49.6%, and 97.4%, respectively. Median coronary artery calcium score (CAC) was higher in CAD+-patients but did not have predictive value for correct classification of patients with cCTA. There were no significant differences in clinical events between Group A and B. Conclusion: cCTA can be incorporated into pre-TAVI CT-evaluation with no need for additional contrast medium. cCTA may exclude significant CAD in a relatively high percentage of these high-risk patients. Thereby, cCTA may have the potential to reduce the need for ICA and total amount of contrast medium applied, possibly making pre-procedural evaluation for TAVI safer and faster

Bioresorbable coronary stents : non-invasive quantitative assessment of edge and intrastent plaque – a 256-slice computed tomography longitudinal study

Les bioresorbable stents (BRS), en français intitulés tuteurs coronariens biorésorbables, sont constitués d’un polymère biorésorbable, plutôt que de métal, et ne créent pas d’artéfacts métalliques significatifs en tomodensitométrie (TDM). Cela permet une meilleure évaluation de la plaque coronarienne sous ces tuteurs en TDM qu’avec les anciens tuteurs qui sont en métal. OBJECTIF: Évaluer l’évolution de la composition de la plaque, sa fraction lipidique (FL)— marqueur de vulnérabilité de la plaque, dans les 3 zones pré-tuteur (bord proximal), intra-tuteur et post-tuteur (bord distal), et le volume de la plaque entre 1 et 12 mois post-implantation de BRS. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Il s’agit d’une étude observationnelle longitudinale réalisée chez 27 patients consécutifs (âge moyen 59,7 +/- 8,6 ans) et recrutés prospectivement pour une imagerie par TDM 256-coupes à 1 et 12 mois post-implantation de BRS (35 tuteurs total). Les objectifs primaires sont: volume de plaque totale et de FL (mm3) comparés entre 1 et 12 mois. Afin de tenir compte de la corrélation intra-patient, des analyses de variance des modèles linéaires mixtes avec ou sans spline sont utilisés avec deux facteurs répétés temps et zone/bloc (1 bloc= 5 mm en axe longitudinal). La valeur % FL= volume absolu du FL/ volume total de la plaque. RÉSULTATS: Notre analyse par bloc ou par spline n’a pas démontré une différence significative dans les volumes de plaque ou des FL dans les zones pre- intra- and post-tuteur entre 1 et 12 mois. CONCLUSION: Notre étude a réussi à démontrer la faisabilité d’une analyse non-invasive quantitative répétée de la plaque coronarienne et de la lumière intra-tuteur avec l’utilisation de TDM 256 coupes. Cette étude pilote n’a pas démontré de différence significative dans les volumes des plaques et atténuation entre 1- et 12- mois de follow-up post-implantation de BRS. Notre méthode pourrait être appliquée à l’évaluation des différents structures ou profils pharmacologiques de ces tuteurs.Coronary bioresorbable stents (BRS) are made of a bioresorbable polymer rather than metal. Unlike metallic stents, BRS do not produce significant artifacts in computed tomography (CT) and are radiolucent in CT, making it possible to evaluate coronary plaque beneath an implanted stent. PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the volumes of plaque and low attenuation plaque components (LAP —a marker of plaque vulnerability) of pre-, intra- and post-stent plaque location between 1 and 12 months post-implantation. METHODS: In our prospective longitudinal study, we recruited 27 consecutive patients (mean age 59.7 +/- 8.6 years) with bioresorbable stents (n=35) for a 256-slice ECG-synchronized CT evaluation at 1 month and at 12 months post stent implantation. Total plaque volume (mm3) as well as absolute and relative (%) LAP volume per block in the pre-, intra- and post-stent zones were analyzed; comparison of 1 and 12 months post BRS implantation. Changes in these variables were assessed using mixed effects models with and without spline, which also accounted for correlation between repeated measurements with factors such as time and zone/block (1 block = 5 mm in longitudinal axis). The value % LAP= LAP absolute volume/ total plaque volume. RESULTS: Our block or spline model analysis showed no significant difference in plaque or LAP volumes in pre-, intra- and post-stent zones measured at 1 month and at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of repeated non-invasive quantitative analysis of intrastent coronary plaque and in-stent lumen using a 256-channel CT scan. This pilot study did not show significant differences in plaque volume and attenuation between 1- and 12-month follow-up from stent implantation. The method we used could be applied to the evaluation of different stent structures or different pharmacological profiles of bioresorbable stents

Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) for evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a population with extensive coronary calcifications without heart rate control. Thirty patients (24 male, 6 female, mean age 63.1±11.3 years) with a high pre-test probability of CAD underwent DSCT coronary angiography and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 14±9 days. No beta-blockers were administered prior to the scan. Two readers independently assessed image quality of all coronary segments with a diameter ≥1.5 mm using a four-point score (1: excellent to 4: not assessable) and qualitatively assessed significant stenoses as narrowing of the luminal diameter >50%. Causes of false-positive (FP) and false-negative (FN) ratings were assigned to calcifications or motion artifacts. ICA was considered the standard of reference. Mean body mass index was 28.3±3.9 kg/m(2) (range 22.4–36.3 kg/m(2)), mean heart rate during CT was 70.3±14.2 bpm (range 47–102 bpm), and mean Agatston score was 821±904 (range 0–3,110). Image quality was diagnostic (scores 1–3) in 98.6% (414/420) of segments (mean image quality score 1.68±0.75); six segments in three patients were considered not assessable (1.4%). DSCT correctly identified 54 of 56 significant coronary stenoses. Severe calcifications accounted for false ratings in nine segments (eight FP/one FN) and motion artifacts in two segments (one FP/one FN). Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for evaluating CAD were 96.4, 97.5, 85.7, and 99.4%, respectively. First experience indicates that DSCT coronary angiography provides high diagnostic accuracy for assessment of CAD in a high pre-test probability population with extensive coronary calcifications and without heart rate control

Coronary computed tomography angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination

Aims To evaluate the feasibility and image quality of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) acquisition with a submillisievert fraction of effective radiation dose using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) for noise reduction. Methods and results In 42 patients undergoing standard low-dose (100-120 kV; 450-700 mA) and additional ultra-low-dose CCTA (80-100 kV; 150-210 mA) reconstructed with MBIR, segmental image quality was graded on a four-point scale [(i): non-evaluative, (ii): good, (iii): adequate, and (iv): excellent]. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated dividing left main artery (LMA) and right coronary artery (RCA) attenuation by the aortic root noise. Over a wide range of body mass index (18-40 kg/m2), the estimated median radiation dose exposure was 1.19 mSv [interquartile range (IQR): 1.07-1.30 mSv] for standard and 0.21 mSv (IQR: 0.18-0.23 mSv) for ultra-low-dose CCTA (P < 0.001). The median image quality score per segment was 3.5 (IQR: 3.0-4.0) in standard CCTA vs. 3.5 (IQR: 2.5-4.0) in ultra-low dose with MBIR (P = 0.29). Diagnostic image quality (scores 2-4) was found in 98.7 vs. 97.8% coronary segments (P = 0.36). Introduction of MBIR for ultra-low-dose CCTA resulted in a significant increase in SNR (P < 0.001) for LMA (from 15 ± 5 to 29 ± 7) and RCA (from 14 ± 4 to 27 ± 6) despite 82% dose reduction. Conclusion Coronary computed tomography angiography acquisition with diagnostic image quality is feasible at an ultra-lowradiation dose of 0.21 mSv, e.g. in the range reported for a postero-anterior and lateral chest X-ra