27,506 research outputs found
Quantifying the implicit process flow abstraction in SBGN-PD diagrams with Bio-PEPA
For a long time biologists have used visual representations of biochemical
networks to gain a quick overview of important structural properties. Recently
SBGN, the Systems Biology Graphical Notation, has been developed to standardise
the way in which such graphical maps are drawn in order to facilitate the
exchange of information. Its qualitative Process Diagrams (SBGN-PD) are based
on an implicit Process Flow Abstraction (PFA) that can also be used to
construct quantitative representations, which can be used for automated
analyses of the system. Here we explicitly describe the PFA that underpins
SBGN-PD and define attributes for SBGN-PD glyphs that make it possible to
capture the quantitative details of a biochemical reaction network. We
implemented SBGNtext2BioPEPA, a tool that demonstrates how such quantitative
details can be used to automatically generate working Bio-PEPA code from a
textual representation of SBGN-PD that we developed. Bio-PEPA is a process
algebra that was designed for implementing quantitative models of concurrent
biochemical reaction systems. We use this approach to compute the expected
delay between input and output using deterministic and stochastic simulations
of the MAPK signal transduction cascade. The scheme developed here is general
and can be easily adapted to other output formalisms
Developmental Systems Theory as a Process Theory
Griffiths and Russell D. Gray (1994, 1997, 2001) have argued that the fundamental unit of analysis in developmental systems theory should be a process – the life cycle – and not a set of developmental resources and interactions between those resources. The key concepts of developmental systems theory, epigenesis and developmental dynamics, both also suggest a process view of the units of development. This chapter explores in more depth the features of developmental systems theory that favour treating processes as fundamental in biology and examines the continuity between developmental systems theory and ideas about process in the work of several major figures in early 20th century biology, most notable C.H Waddington
Complexity of evolutionary equilibria in static fitness landscapes
A fitness landscape is a genetic space -- with two genotypes adjacent if they
differ in a single locus -- and a fitness function. Evolutionary dynamics
produce a flow on this landscape from lower fitness to higher; reaching
equilibrium only if a local fitness peak is found. I use computational
complexity to question the common assumption that evolution on static fitness
landscapes can quickly reach a local fitness peak. I do this by showing that
the popular NK model of rugged fitness landscapes is PLS-complete for K >= 2;
the reduction from Weighted 2SAT is a bijection on adaptive walks, so there are
NK fitness landscapes where every adaptive path from some vertices is of
exponential length. Alternatively -- under the standard complexity theoretic
assumption that there are problems in PLS not solvable in polynomial time --
this means that there are no evolutionary dynamics (known, or to be discovered,
and not necessarily following adaptive paths) that can converge to a local
fitness peak on all NK landscapes with K = 2. Applying results from the
analysis of simplex algorithms, I show that there exist single-peaked
landscapes with no reciprocal sign epistasis where the expected length of an
adaptive path following strong selection weak mutation dynamics is
even though an adaptive path to the optimum of length less
than n is available from every vertex. The technical results are written to be
accessible to mathematical biologists without a computer science background,
and the biological literature is summarized for the convenience of
non-biologists with the aim to open a constructive dialogue between the two
disciplines.Comment: 14 pages, 3 figure
Bridging Physics and Biology Teaching through Modeling
As the frontiers of biology become increasingly interdisciplinary, the
physics education community has engaged in ongoing efforts to make physics
classes more relevant to life sciences majors. These efforts are complicated by
the many apparent differences between these fields, including the types of
systems that each studies, the behavior of those systems, the kinds of
measurements that each makes, and the role of mathematics in each field.
Nonetheless, physics and biology are both sciences that rely on observations
and measurements to construct models of the natural world. In the present
theoretical article, we propose that efforts to bridge the teaching of these
two disciplines must emphasize shared scientific practices, particularly
scientific modeling. We define modeling using language common to both
disciplines and highlight how an understanding of the modeling process can help
reconcile apparent differences between the teaching of physics and biology. We
elaborate how models can be used for explanatory, predictive, and functional
purposes and present common models from each discipline demonstrating key
modeling principles. By framing interdisciplinary teaching in the context of
modeling, we aim to bridge physics and biology teaching and to equip students
with modeling competencies applicable across any scientific discipline.Comment: 10 pages, 2 figures, 3 table
Repeated sequences in linear genetic programming genomes
Biological chromosomes are replete with repetitive sequences, micro
satellites, SSR tracts, ALU, etc. in their DNA base sequences. We
started looking for similar phenomena in evolutionary computation.
First studies find copious repeated sequences, which can be hierarchically
decomposed into shorter sequences, in programs evolved using
both homologous and two point crossover but not with headless chicken
crossover or other mutations. In bloated programs the small number
of effective or expressed instructions appear in both repeated and nonrepeated
code. Hinting that building-blocks or code reuse may evolve
in unplanned ways.
Mackey-Glass chaotic time series prediction and eukaryotic protein
localisation (both previously used as artificial intelligence machine
learning benchmarks) demonstrate evolution of Shannon information
(entropy) and lead to models capable of lossy Kolmogorov compression.
Our findings with diverse benchmarks and GP systems suggest
this emergent phenomenon may be widespread in genetic systems
Achilles And The Tortoise: Some Caveats To Mathematical Modeling In Biology
Mathematical modeling has recently become a much-lauded enterprise, and many funding agencies seek to prioritize this endeavor. However, there are certain dangers associated with mathematical modeling, and knowledge of these pitfalls should also be part of a biologist\u27s training in this set of techniques. (1) Mathematical models are limited by known science; (2) Mathematical models can tell what can happen, but not what did happen; (3) A model does not have to conform to reality, even if it is logically consistent; (4) Models abstract from reality, and sometimes what they eliminate is critically important; (5) Mathematics can present a Platonic ideal to which biologically organized matter strives, rather than a trial-and-error bumbling through evolutionary processes. This “Unity of Science” approach, which sees biology as the lowest physical science and mathematics as the highest science, is part of a Western belief system, often called the Great Chain of Being (or Scala Natura), that sees knowledge emerge as one passes from biology to chemistry to physics to mathematics, in an ascending progression of reason being purification from matter. This is also an informal model for the emergence of new life. There are now other informal models for integrating development and evolution, but each has its limitations
Recommended from our members
The Alliance of Genome Resources: Building a Modern Data Ecosystem for Model Organism Databases.
Model organisms are essential experimental platforms for discovering gene functions, defining protein and genetic networks, uncovering functional consequences of human genome variation, and for modeling human disease. For decades, researchers who use model organisms have relied on Model Organism Databases (MODs) and the Gene Ontology Consortium (GOC) for expertly curated annotations, and for access to integrated genomic and biological information obtained from the scientific literature and public data archives. Through the development and enforcement of data and semantic standards, these genome resources provide rapid access to the collected knowledge of model organisms in human readable and computation-ready formats that would otherwise require countless hours for individual researchers to assemble on their own. Since their inception, the MODs for the predominant biomedical model organisms [Mus sp (laboratory mouse), Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, Danio rerio, and Rattus norvegicus] along with the GOC have operated as a network of independent, highly collaborative genome resources. In 2016, these six MODs and the GOC joined forces as the Alliance of Genome Resources (the Alliance). By implementing shared programmatic access methods and data-specific web pages with a unified "look and feel," the Alliance is tackling barriers that have limited the ability of researchers to easily compare common data types and annotations across model organisms. To adapt to the rapidly changing landscape for evaluating and funding core data resources, the Alliance is building a modern, extensible, and operationally efficient "knowledge commons" for model organisms using shared, modular infrastructure
Ecological immunology of mosquito-malaria interactions: Of non-natural versus natural model systems and their inferences
There has been a recent shift in the literature on mosquito/Plasmodium interactions with an increasingly large number of theoretical and experimental studies focusing on their population biology and evolutionary processes. Ecological immunology of mosquito-malaria interactions - the study of the mechanisms and function of mosquito immune responses to Plasmodium in their ecological and evolutionary context - is particularly important for our understanding of malaria transmission and how to control it. Indeed, describing the processes that create and maintain variation in mosquito immune responses and parasite virulence in natural populations may be as important to this endeavor as describing the immune responses themselves. For historical reasons, Ecological Immunology still largely relies on studies based on non-natural model systems. There are many reasons why current research should favour studies conducted closer to the field and more realistic experimental systems whenever possible. As a result, a number of researchers have raised concerns over the use of artificial host-parasite associations to generate inferences about population-level processes. Here I discuss and review several lines of evidence that, I believe, best illustrate and summarize the limitations of inferences generated using non-natural model systems
- …