234 research outputs found
Combinatorial Voter Control in Elections
Voter control problems model situations such as an external agent trying to
affect the result of an election by adding voters, for example by convincing
some voters to vote who would otherwise not attend the election. Traditionally,
voters are added one at a time, with the goal of making a distinguished
alternative win by adding a minimum number of voters. In this paper, we
initiate the study of combinatorial variants of control by adding voters: In
our setting, when we choose to add a voter~, we also have to add a whole
bundle of voters associated with . We study the computational
complexity of this problem for two of the most basic voting rules, namely the
Plurality rule and the Condorcet rule.Comment: An extended abstract appears in MFCS 201
On the Hardness of Bribery Variants in Voting with CP-Nets
We continue previous work by Mattei et al. (Mattei, N., Pini, M., Rossi, F.,
Venable, K.: Bribery in voting with CP-nets. Ann. of Math. and Artif. Intell.
pp. 1--26 (2013)) in which they study the computational complexity of bribery
schemes when voters have conditional preferences that are modeled by CP-nets.
For most of the cases they considered, they could show that the bribery problem
is solvable in polynomial time. Some cases remained open---we solve two of them
and extend the previous results to the case that voters are weighted. Moreover,
we consider negative (weighted) bribery in CP-nets, when the briber is not
allowed to pay voters to vote for his preferred candidate.Comment: improved readability; identified Cheapest Subsets to be the
enumeration variant of K.th Largest Subset, so we renamed it to K-Smallest
Subsets and point to the literatur; some more typos fixe
The Complexity of Manipulative Attacks in Nearly Single-Peaked Electorates
Many electoral bribery, control, and manipulation problems (which we will
refer to in general as "manipulative actions" problems) are NP-hard in the
general case. It has recently been noted that many of these problems fall into
polynomial time if the electorate is single-peaked (i.e., is polarized along
some axis/issue). However, real-world electorates are not truly single-peaked.
There are usually some mavericks, and so real-world electorates tend to merely
be nearly single-peaked. This paper studies the complexity of
manipulative-action algorithms for elections over nearly single-peaked
electorates, for various notions of nearness and various election systems. We
provide instances where even one maverick jumps the manipulative-action
complexity up to \np-hardness, but we also provide many instances where a
reasonable number of mavericks can be tolerated without increasing the
manipulative-action complexity.Comment: 35 pages, also appears as URCS-TR-2011-96
07431 Abstracts Collection -- Computational Issues in Social Choice
From the 21st to the 26th of October 2007, the Dagstuhl Seminar 07431
on ``Computational Issues in Social Choice\u27\u27 was held
at the International Conference and Research Center (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl.
During the seminar, several participants presented their recent
research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed.
The abstracts of the talks given during the seminar are collected in this paper.
The first section summarises the seminar topics and goals in general.
Links to full papers are provided where available
10101 Abstracts Collection -- Computational Foundations of Social Choice
From March 7 to March 12, 2010, the Dagstuhl Seminar 10101
``Computational Foundations of Social Choice \u27\u27 was held in Schloss Dagstuhl~--~Leibniz Center for Informatics.
During the seminar, several participants presented their current
research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of
the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section
describes the seminar topics and goals in general.
Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available
- …