38,436 research outputs found
On the size of binary decision diagrams representing Boolean functions
AbstractWe consider the size of the representation of Boolean functions by several classes of binary decision diagrams (BDDs) (also called branching programs), namely the classes of arbitrary BDDs of real time BDD (RBDD) (i.e. BDDs where each computation path is limited to the number of variables), of free BDDs (FBDDs) (also called read-once-only branching programs), of ordered BDDs (OBDDS) i.e. FBDDs where variables are tested in the same order along all paths), and binary decision trees (BDTs).Using well-known techniques, we first establish asymptotically sharp bounds as a function of n on the minimum size of arbitrary BDDs representing almost all Boolean functions of n variables and provide asymptotic lower and upper bounds, differing only by a factor of two, on the minimum size OBDDs representing almost all Boolean functions of n variables.We then, using a method to obtain exponential lower bounds on complexity of computation of Boolean functions by RBDD, FBDD and OBDD that originated in (Breitbart, 1968), present the highest such bounds to date and also present improved bounds on the relative economy of description of particular Boolean functions by the above classes of BDDs. For each nontrivial pair of BDD classes considered, we exhibit infinite families of Boolean functions representable much more concisely by BDDs in one class than by BDDs in the other
OBDD-Based Representation of Interval Graphs
A graph can be described by the characteristic function of the
edge set which maps a pair of binary encoded nodes to 1 iff the nodes
are adjacent. Using \emph{Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams} (OBDDs) to store
can lead to a (hopefully) compact representation. Given the OBDD as an
input, symbolic/implicit OBDD-based graph algorithms can solve optimization
problems by mainly using functional operations, e.g. quantification or binary
synthesis. While the OBDD representation size can not be small in general, it
can be provable small for special graph classes and then also lead to fast
algorithms. In this paper, we show that the OBDD size of unit interval graphs
is and the OBDD size of interval graphs is $O(\
| V \ | \log \ | V \ |)\Omega(\ | V \ | \log
\ | V \ |)O(\log \ | V \ |)O(\log^2 \ | V \ |)$ operations and
evaluate the algorithms empirically.Comment: 29 pages, accepted for 39th International Workshop on Graph-Theoretic
Concepts 201
An n log n Algorithm for Online BDD Refinement
Binary Decision Diagrams are in widespread use in verification systemsfor the canonical representation of Boolean functions. A BDD representinga function phi : B^nu -> N can easily be reduced to its canonical form inlinear time.In this paper, we consider a natural online BDD refinement problemand show that it can be solved in O(n log n) if n bounds the size of theBDD and the total size of update operations.We argue that BDDs in an algebraic framework should be understoodas minimal fixed points superimposed on maximal fixed points. We proposea technique of controlled growth of equivalence classes to make theminimal fixed point calculations be carried out efficiently. Our algorithmis based on a new understanding of the interplay between the splittingand growing of classes of nodes.We apply our algorithm to show that automata with exponentiallylarge, but implicitly represented alphabets, can be minimized in timeO(n log n), where n is the total number of BDD nodes representing theautomaton
Chain Reduction for Binary and Zero-Suppressed Decision Diagrams
Chain reduction enables reduced ordered binary decision diagrams (BDDs) and
zero-suppressed binary decision diagrams (ZDDs) to each take advantage of the
others' ability to symbolically represent Boolean functions in compact form.
For any Boolean function, its chain-reduced ZDD (CZDD) representation will be
no larger than its ZDD representation, and at most twice the size of its BDD
representation. The chain-reduced BDD (CBDD) of a function will be no larger
than its BDD representation, and at most three times the size of its CZDD
representation. Extensions to the standard algorithms for operating on BDDs and
ZDDs enable them to operate on the chain-reduced versions. Experimental
evaluations on representative benchmarks for encoding word lists, solving
combinatorial problems, and operating on digital circuits indicate that chain
reduction can provide significant benefits in terms of both memory and
execution time
Improving Optimization Bounds using Machine Learning: Decision Diagrams meet Deep Reinforcement Learning
Finding tight bounds on the optimal solution is a critical element of
practical solution methods for discrete optimization problems. In the last
decade, decision diagrams (DDs) have brought a new perspective on obtaining
upper and lower bounds that can be significantly better than classical bounding
mechanisms, such as linear relaxations. It is well known that the quality of
the bounds achieved through this flexible bounding method is highly reliant on
the ordering of variables chosen for building the diagram, and finding an
ordering that optimizes standard metrics is an NP-hard problem. In this paper,
we propose an innovative and generic approach based on deep reinforcement
learning for obtaining an ordering for tightening the bounds obtained with
relaxed and restricted DDs. We apply the approach to both the Maximum
Independent Set Problem and the Maximum Cut Problem. Experimental results on
synthetic instances show that the deep reinforcement learning approach, by
achieving tighter objective function bounds, generally outperforms ordering
methods commonly used in the literature when the distribution of instances is
known. To the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first paper to apply
machine learning to directly improve relaxation bounds obtained by
general-purpose bounding mechanisms for combinatorial optimization problems.Comment: Accepted and presented at AAAI'1
- …