BLOCK: Bilinear Superdiagonal Fusion for Visual Question Answering and Visual Relationship Detection

Multimodal representation learning is gaining more and more interest within the deep learning community. While bilinear models provide an interesting framework to find subtle combination of modalities, their number of parameters grows quadratically with the input dimensions, making their practical implementation within classical deep learning pipelines challenging. In this paper, we introduce BLOCK, a new multimodal fusion based on the block-superdiagonal tensor decomposition. It leverages the notion of block-term ranks, which generalizes both concepts of rank and mode ranks for tensors, already used for multimodal fusion. It allows to define new ways for optimizing the tradeoff between the expressiveness and complexity of the fusion model, and is able to represent very fine interactions between modalities while maintaining powerful mono-modal representations. We demonstrate the practical interest of our fusion model by using BLOCK for two challenging tasks: Visual Question Answering (VQA) and Visual Relationship Detection (VRD), where we design end-to-end learnable architectures for representing relevant interactions between modalities. Through extensive experiments, we show that BLOCK compares favorably with respect to state-of-the-art multimodal fusion models for both VQA and VRD tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/Cadene/block.bootstrap.pytorch

Pruning population size in XCS for complex problems

In this report, we show how to prune the population size of the Learning Classifier System XCS for complex problems. We say a problem is complex, when the number of specified bits of the optimal start classifiers (the prob lem dimension) is not constant. First, we derive how to estimate an equiv- alent problem dimension for complex problems based on the optimal start classifiers. With the equivalent problem dimension, we calculate the optimal maximum population size just like for regular problems, which has already been done. We empirically validate our results. Furthermore, we introduce a subsumption method to reduce the number of classifiers. In contrast to existing methods, we subsume the classifiers after the learning process, so subsuming does not hinder the evolution of optimal classifiers, which has been reported previously. After subsumption, the number of classifiers drops to about the order of magnitude of the optimal classifiers while the correctness rate nearly stays constant

Using the XCS classifier system for multi-objective reinforcement learning problems

We investigate the performance of a learning classifier system in some simple multi-objective, multi-step maze problems, using both random and biased action-selection policies for exploration. Results show that the choice of action-selection policy can significantly affect the performance of the system in such environments. Further, this effect is directly related to population size, and we relate this finding to recent theoretical studies of learning classifier systems in single-step problems. © 2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Incorporating feature ranking and evolutionary methods for the classification of high-dimensional DNA microarray gene expression data

Background: DNA microarray gene expression classification poses a challenging task to the machine learning domain. Typically, the dimensionality of gene expression data sets could go from several thousands to over 10,000 genes. A potential solution to this issue is using feature selection to reduce the dimensionality. Aim The aim of this paper is to investigate how we can use feature quality information to improve the precision of microarray gene expression classification tasks. Method: We propose two evolutionary machine learning models based on the eXtended Classifier System (XCS) and a typical feature selection methodology. The first one, which we call FS-XCS, uses feature selection for feature reduction purposes. The second model is GRD-XCS, which uses feature ranking to bias the rule discovery process of XCS. Results: The results indicate that the use of feature selection/ranking methods is essential for tackling high-dimensional classification tasks, such as microarray gene expression classification. However, the results also suggest that using feature ranking to bias the rule discovery process performs significantly better than using the feature reduction method. In other words, using feature quality information to develop a smarter learning procedure is more efficient than reducing the feature set. Conclusion: Our findings have shown that extracting feature quality information can assist the learning process and improve classification accuracy. On the other hand, relying exclusively on the feature quality information might potentially decrease the classification performance (e.g., using feature reduction). Therefore, we recommend a hybrid approach that uses feature quality information to direct the learning process by highlighting the more informative features, but at the same time not restricting the learning process to explore other features

Lexicase selection in Learning Classifier Systems

The lexicase parent selection method selects parents by considering performance on individual data points in random order instead of using a fitness function based on an aggregated data accuracy. While the method has demonstrated promise in genetic programming and more recently in genetic algorithms, its applications in other forms of evolutionary machine learning have not been explored. In this paper, we investigate the use of lexicase parent selection in Learning Classifier Systems (LCS) and study its effect on classification problems in a supervised setting. We further introduce a new variant of lexicase selection, called batch-lexicase selection, which allows for the tuning of selection pressure. We compare the two lexicase selection methods with tournament and fitness proportionate selection methods on binary classification problems. We show that batch-lexicase selection results in the creation of more generic rules which is favorable for generalization on future data. We further show that batch-lexicase selection results in better generalization in situations of partial or missing data.Comment: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, 201

学習戦略に基づく学習分類子システムの設計

On Learning Classifier Systems dubbed LCSs a leaning strategy which defines how LCSs cover a state-action space in a problem can be one of the most fundamental options in designing LCSs. There lacks an intensive study of the learning strategy to understand whether and how the learning strategy affects the performance of LCSs. This lack has resulted in the current design methodology of LCS which does not carefully consider the types of learning strategy. The thesis clarifies a need of a design methodology of LCS based on the learning strategy. That is, the thesis shows the learning strategy can be an option that determines the potential performance of LCSs and then claims that LCSs should be designed on the basis of the learning strategy in order to improve the performance of LCSs. First, the thesis empirically claims that the current design methodology of LCS, without the consideration of learning strategy, can be limited to design a proper LCS to solve a problem. This supports the need of design methodology based on the learning strategy. Next, the thesis presents an example of how LCS can be designed on the basis of the learning strategy. The thesis empirically show an adequate learning strategy improving the performance of LCS can be decided depending on a type of problem difficulties such as missing attributes. Then, the thesis draws an inclusive guideline that explains which learning strategy should be used to address which types of problem difficulties. Finally, the thesis further shows, on an application of LCS for a human daily activity recognition problem, the adequate learning strategy according to the guideline effectively improves the performance of the application. The thesis concludes that the learning strategy is the option of the LCS design which determines the potential performance of LCSs. Thus, before designing any type of LCSs including their applications, the learning strategy should be adequately selected at first, because their performance degrades when they employ an inadequate learning strategy to a problem they want to solve. In other words, LCSs should be designed on the basis of the adequate learning strategy.電気通信大学201