43 research outputs found

    Bounding Helly numbers via Betti numbers

    Get PDF
    We show that very weak topological assumptions are enough to ensure the existence of a Helly-type theorem. More precisely, we show that for any non-negative integers bb and dd there exists an integer h(b,d)h(b,d) such that the following holds. If F\mathcal F is a finite family of subsets of Rd\mathbb R^d such that β~i(⋂G)≤b\tilde\beta_i\left(\bigcap\mathcal G\right) \le b for any G⊊F\mathcal G \subsetneq \mathcal F and every 0≤i≤⌈d/2⌉−10 \le i \le \lceil d/2 \rceil-1 then F\mathcal F has Helly number at most h(b,d)h(b,d). Here β~i\tilde\beta_i denotes the reduced Z2\mathbb Z_2-Betti numbers (with singular homology). These topological conditions are sharp: not controlling any of these ⌈d/2⌉\lceil d/2 \rceil first Betti numbers allow for families with unbounded Helly number. Our proofs combine homological non-embeddability results with a Ramsey-based approach to build, given an arbitrary simplicial complex KK, some well-behaved chain map C∗(K)→C∗(Rd)C_*(K) \to C_*(\mathbb R^d).Comment: 29 pages, 8 figure

    Bounding Helly Numbers via Betti Numbers

    Get PDF
    We show that very weak topological assumptions are enough to ensure the existence of a Helly-type theorem. More precisely, we show that for any non-negative integers b and d there exists an integer h(b,d) such that the following holds. If F is a finite family of subsets of R^d such that the ith reduced Betti number (with Z_2 coefficients in singular homology) of the intersection of any proper subfamily G of F is at most b for every non-negative integer i less or equal to (d-1)/2, then F has Helly number at most h(b,d). These topological conditions are sharp: not controlling any of these first Betti numbers allow for families with unbounded Helly number. Our proofs combine homological non-embeddability results with a Ramsey-based approach to build, given an arbitrary simplicial complex K, some well-behaved chain map from C_*(K) to C_*(R^d). Both techniques are of independent interest

    Bounding Radon Number via Betti Numbers

    Get PDF
    We prove general topological Radon-type theorems for sets in ?^d, smooth real manifolds or finite dimensional simplicial complexes. Combined with a recent result of Holmsen and Lee, it gives fractional Helly theorem, and consequently the existence of weak ?-nets as well as a (p,q)-theorem. More precisely: Let X be either ?^d, smooth real d-manifold, or a finite d-dimensional simplicial complex. Then if F is a finite, intersection-closed family of sets in X such that the ith reduced Betti number (with ?? coefficients) of any set in F is at most b for every non-negative integer i less or equal to k, then the Radon number of F is bounded in terms of b and X. Here k is the smallest integer larger or equal to d/2 - 1 if X = ?^d; k=d-1 if X is a smooth real d-manifold and not a surface, k=0 if X is a surface and k=d if X is a d-dimensional simplicial complex. Using the recent result of the author and Kalai, we manage to prove the following optimal bound on fractional Helly number for families of open sets in a surface: Let F be a finite family of open sets in a surface S such that the intersection of any subfamily of F is either empty, or path-connected. Then the fractional Helly number of F is at most three. This also settles a conjecture of Holmsen, Kim, and Lee about an existence of a (p,q)-theorem for open subsets of a surface

    Bounding Radon's number via Betti numbers

    Full text link
    We prove general topological Radon type theorems for sets in Rd\mathbb R^d, smooth real manifolds or finite dimensional simplicial complexes. Combined with a recent result of Holmsen and Lee, it gives fractional Helly and colorful Helly theorems, and consequently an existence of weak ε\varepsilon-nets as well as a (p,q)(p,q)-theorem. More precisely: Let XX be either Rd\mathbb R^d, smooth real dd-manifold, or a finite dd-dimensional simplicial complex. Then if F\mathcal F is a finite family of sets in XX such that β~i(⋂G;Z2)\widetilde\beta_i(\bigcap \mathcal G; \mathbb Z_2) is at most bb for all i=0,1,…,ki=0,1,\ldots, k and G⊆F\mathcal G\subseteq \mathcal F, then the Radon's number of F\mathcal F is bounded in terms of bb and XX. Here k=⌈d2⌉−1k=\left\lceil\frac{d}{2}\right\rceil-1 if X=RdX=\mathbb R^d; k=d−1k=d-1 if XX is a smooth real dd-manifold and not a surface, k=0k=0 if XX is a surface and k=dk=d if XX is a dd-dimensional simplicial complex. Using the recent result of the author and Kalai, we manage to prove the following optimal bound on fractional Helly number for families of open sets in a surface: Let F\mathcal F be a finite family of open sets in a surface SS such that for every G⊆F\mathcal G\subseteq \mathcal F, ⋂G\bigcap \mathcal G is either empty, or path-connected. Then the fractional Helly number of F\mathcal F is at most three. This also settles a conjecture of Holmsen, Kim, and Lee about an existence of a (p,q)(p,q)-theorem for open subsets of a surface.Comment: 11 pages, 2 figure

    A Stepping-Up Lemma for Topological Set Systems

    Get PDF
    corecore