Cell line name recognition in support of the identification of synthetic lethality in cancer from text

Motivation: The recognition and normalization of cell line names in text is an important task in biomedical text mining research, facilitating for instance the identification of synthetically lethal genes from the literature. While several tools have previously been developed to address cell line recognition, it is unclear whether available systems can perform sufficiently well in realistic and broad-coverage applications such as extracting synthetically lethal genes from the cancer literature. In this study, we revisit the cell line name recognition task, evaluating both available systems and newly introduced methods on various resources to obtain a reliable tagger not tied to any specific subdomain. In support of this task, we introduce two text collections manually annotated for cell line names: the broad-coverage corpus Gellus and CLL, a focused target domain corpus. Results: We find that the best performance is achieved using NERsuite, a machine learning system based on Conditional Random Fields, trained on the Gellus corpus and supported with a dictionary of cell line names. The system achieves an F-score of 88.46% on the test set of Gellus and 85.98% on the independently annotated CLL corpus. It was further applied at large scale to 24 302 102 unannotated articles, resulting in the identification of 5 181 342 cell line mentions, normalized to 11 755 unique cell line database identifiers

Overview of BioCreative II gene normalization

Background: The goal of the gene normalization task is to link genes or gene products mentioned in the literature to biological databases. This is a key step in an accurate search of the biological literature. It is a challenging task, even for the human expert; genes are often described rather than referred to by gene symbol and, confusingly, one gene name may refer to different genes (often from different organisms). For BioCreative II, the task was to list the Entrez Gene identifiers for human genes or gene products mentioned in PubMed/MEDLINE abstracts. We selected abstracts associated with articles previously curated for human genes. We provided 281 expert-annotated abstracts containing 684 gene identifiers for training, and a blind test set of 262 documents containing 785 identifiers, with a gold standard created by expert annotators. Inter-annotator agreement was measured at over 90%. Results: Twenty groups submitted one to three runs each, for a total of 54 runs. Three systems achieved F-measures (balanced precision and recall) between 0.80 and 0.81. Combining the system outputs using simple voting schemes and classifiers obtained improved results; the best composite system achieved an F-measure of 0.92 with 10-fold cross-validation. A 'maximum recall' system based on the pooled responses of all participants gave a recall of 0.97 (with precision 0.23), identifying 763 out of 785 identifiers. Conclusion: Major advances for the BioCreative II gene normalization task include broader participation (20 versus 8 teams) and a pooled system performance comparable to human experts, at over 90% agreement. These results show promise as tools to link the literature with biological databases

Boosting automatic event extraction from the literature using domain adaptation and coreference resolution

Motivation: In recent years, several biomedical event extraction (EE) systems have been developed. However, the nature of the annotated training corpora, as well as the training process itself, can limit the performance levels of the trained EE systems. In particular, most event-annotated corpora do not deal adequately with coreference. This impacts on the trained systems' ability to recognize biomedical entities, thus affecting their performance in extracting events accurately. Additionally, the fact that most EE systems are trained on a single annotated corpus further restricts their coverage

Information Extraction from Text for Improving Research on Small Molecules and Histone Modifications

The cumulative number of publications, in particular in the life sciences, requires efficient methods for the automated extraction of information and semantic information retrieval. The recognition and identification of information-carrying units in text – concept denominations and named entities – relevant to a certain domain is a fundamental step. The focus of this thesis lies on the recognition of chemical entities and the new biological named entity type histone modifications, which are both important in the field of drug discovery. As the emergence of new research fields as well as the discovery and generation of novel entities goes along with the coinage of new terms, the perpetual adaptation of respective named entity recognition approaches to new domains is an important step for information extraction. Two methodologies have been investigated in this concern: the state-of-the-art machine learning method, Conditional Random Fields (CRF), and an approximate string search method based on dictionaries. Recognition methods that rely on dictionaries are strongly dependent on the availability of entity terminology collections as well as on its quality. In the case of chemical entities the terminology is distributed over more than 7 publicly available data sources. The join of entries and accompanied terminology from selected resources enables the generation of a new dictionary comprising chemical named entities. Combined with the automatic processing of respective terminology – the dictionary curation – the recognition performance reached an F1 measure of 0.54. That is an improvement by 29 % in comparison to the raw dictionary. The highest recall was achieved for the class of TRIVIAL-names with 0.79. The recognition and identification of chemical named entities provides a prerequisite for the extraction of related pharmacological relevant information from literature data. Therefore, lexico-syntactic patterns were defined that support the automated extraction of hypernymic phrases comprising pharmacological function terminology related to chemical compounds. It was shown that 29-50 % of the automatically extracted terms can be proposed for novel functional annotation of chemical entities provided by the reference database DrugBank. Furthermore, they are a basis for building up concept hierarchies and ontologies or for extending existing ones. Successively, the pharmacological function and biological activity concepts obtained from text were included into a novel descriptor for chemical compounds. Its successful application for the prediction of pharmacological function of molecules and the extension of chemical classification schemes, such as the the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC), is demonstrated. In contrast to chemical entities, no comprehensive terminology resource has been available for histone modifications. Thus, histone modification concept terminology was primary recognized in text via CRFs with a F1 measure of 0.86. Subsequent, linguistic variants of extracted histone modification terms were mapped to standard representations that were organized into a newly assembled histone modification hierarchy. The mapping was accomplished by a novel developed term mapping approach described in the thesis. The combination of term recognition and term variant resolution builds up a new procedure for the assembly of novel terminology collections. It supports the generation of a term list that is applicable in dictionary-based methods. For the recognition of histone modification in text it could be shown that the named entity recognition method based on dictionaries is superior to the used machine learning approach. In conclusion, the present thesis provides techniques which enable an enhanced utilization of textual data, hence, supporting research in epigenomics and drug discovery

Quantifying the Impact and Extent of Undocumented Biomedical Synonymy

Synonymous relationships among biomedical terms are extensively annotated within specialized terminologies, implying that synonymy is important for practical computational applications within this field. It remains unclear, however, whether text mining actually benefits from documented synonymy and whether existing biomedical thesauri provide adequate coverage of these linguistic relationships. In this study, we examine the impact and extent of undocumented synonymy within a very large compendium of biomedical thesauri. First, we demonstrate that missing synonymy has a significant negative impact on named entity normalization, an important problem within the field of biomedical text mining. To estimate the amount synonymy currently missing from thesauri, we develop a probabilistic model for the construction of synonym terminologies that is capable of handling a wide range of potential biases, and we evaluate its performance using the broader domain of near-synonymy among general English words. Our model predicts that over 90% of these relationships are currently undocumented, a result that we support experimentally through “crowd-sourcing.” Finally, we apply our model to biomedical terminologies and predict that they are missing the vast majority (>90%) of the synonymous relationships they intend to document. Overall, our results expose the dramatic incompleteness of current biomedical thesauri and suggest the need for “next-generation,” high-coverage lexical terminologies.</p

Text Mining the History of Medicine

Historical text archives constitute a rich and diverse source of information, which is becoming increasingly readily accessible, due to large-scale digitisation efforts. However, it can be difficult for researchers to explore and search such large volumes of data in an efficient manner. Text mining (TM) methods can help, through their ability to recognise various types of semantic information automatically, e.g., instances of concepts (places, medical conditions, drugs, etc.), synonyms/variant forms of concepts, and relationships holding between concepts (which drugs are used to treat which medical conditions, etc.). TM analysis allows search systems to incorporate functionality such as automatic suggestions of synonyms of user-entered query terms, exploration of different concepts mentioned within search results or isolation of documents in which concepts are related in specific ways. However, applying TM methods to historical text can be challenging, according to differences and evolutions in vocabulary, terminology, language structure and style, compared to more modern text. In this article, we present our efforts to overcome the various challenges faced in the semantic analysis of published historical medical text dating back to the mid 19th century. Firstly, we used evidence from diverse historical medical documents from different periods to develop new resources that provide accounts of the multiple, evolving ways in which concepts, their variants and relationships amongst them may be expressed. These resources were employed to support the development of a modular processing pipeline of TM tools for the robust detection of semantic information in historical medical documents with varying characteristics. We applied the pipeline to two large-scale medical document archives covering wide temporal ranges as the basis for the development of a publicly accessible semantically-oriented search system. The novel resources are available for research purposes, while the processing pipeline and its modules may be used and configured within the Argo TM platform