Limits on Fundamental Limits to Computation

An indispensable part of our lives, computing has also become essential to industries and governments. Steady improvements in computer hardware have been supported by periodic doubling of transistor densities in integrated circuits over the last fifty years. Such Moore scaling now requires increasingly heroic efforts, stimulating research in alternative hardware and stirring controversy. To help evaluate emerging technologies and enrich our understanding of integrated-circuit scaling, we review fundamental limits to computation: in manufacturing, energy, physical space, design and verification effort, and algorithms. To outline what is achievable in principle and in practice, we recall how some limits were circumvented, compare loose and tight limits. We also point out that engineering difficulties encountered by emerging technologies may indicate yet-unknown limits.Comment: 15 pages, 4 figures, 1 tabl

Analysis of A Splitting Approach for the Parallel Solution of Linear Systems on GPU Cards

We discuss an approach for solving sparse or dense banded linear systems ${\bf A} {\bf x} = {\bf b}$ on a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) card. The matrix ${\bf A} \in {\mathbb{R}}^{N \times N}$ is possibly nonsymmetric and moderately large; i.e., $10000 \leq N \leq 500000$. The ${\it split\ and\ parallelize}$(${\tt SaP}$) approach seeks to partition the matrix${\bf A}$into diagonal sub-blocks${\bf A}_i$,$i=1,\ldots,P$, which are independently factored in parallel. The solution may choose to consider or to ignore the matrices that couple the diagonal sub-blocks${\bf A}_i$. This approach, along with the Krylov subspace-based iterative method that it preconditions, are implemented in a solver called${\tt SaP::GPU}$, which is compared in terms of efficiency with three commonly used sparse direct solvers:${\tt PARDISO}$,${\tt SuperLU}$, and${\tt MUMPS}$.${\tt SaP::GPU}$, which runs entirely on the GPU except several stages involved in preliminary row-column permutations, is robust and compares well in terms of efficiency with the aforementioned direct solvers. In a comparison against Intel's${\tt MKL}$,${\tt SaP::GPU}$also fares well when used to solve dense banded systems that are close to being diagonally dominant.${\tt SaP::GPU}$ is publicly available and distributed as open source under a permissive BSD3 license.Comment: 38 page