Exploring Brain Circuitry: Simultaneous Application of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Non

Physiological characterisation of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Despite its widespread use, a striking lack of knowledge exists regarding the mechanism of action of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). This thesis describes the physiological characterisation of repetitive TMS (rTMS) to the motor system by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). A detailed analysis of imaging artefacts arising from the simultaneous application of TMS-fMRI was conducted and subsequently, strategies were presented for unperturbed TMS-fMRI. Physiological responses during subthreshold high-frequency rTMS of the primary sensorimotor cortex (Ml/Sl) were visualised within distinct cortical motor regions, comprising PMd, SMA, and contralateral Ml/Sl, while no significant responses were evidenced in the area of stimulation. Repetitive TMS during or before motor behaviour illustrated the context- dependence of rTMS-induced activity changes. The first demonstration of TMS-fMRI at 3 Tesla provided evidence that subthreshold rTMS can activate distinct networks including subcortical motor regions. The subthreshold nature of rTMS was confirmed by simultaneous electromyographic recordings from the target muscle. Stimulation of the dorsal premotor cortex provided evidence that rTMS- evoked local activity changes depend on the input function. The capability of TMS to target distinct networks in the human brain was confirmed. TMS targets a set of cortical and subcortical structures. Local responses may not invariably be elicited, indicating that low levels of synaptic activity, as occurring at low-intensity stimulation, do not necessarily evoke corresponding changes in cortical haemodynamics. It is concluded that combined TMS-fMRI offers a means to assess the mechanism of action of TMS at high spatial and temporal resolution

Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with functional magnetic resonance imaging: From target identification to prediction of therapeutic effects in stroke patients

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), particularly theta-burst stimulation (TBS), can be applied to modulate cortical excitability beyond the period of stimulation (Huang et al., 2005). Consequently, rTMS is regarded to have high therapeutic potential for treatment of various psychiatric and neurological diseases related to cortical hypo- or hyperexcitability such as stroke (Ridding & Rothwell, 2007). Whether rTMS induced effects are sufficiently robust to be useful in clinical settings is currently under intense investigation. The most challenging problem appears to be considerably high variability in rTMS induced effects both, across studies (Hoogendam et al., 2010) and individual patients (Ameli et al., 2009). Hence, the major goal of the present thesis was to improve rTMS intervention strategies in stroke patients suffering from chronic motor hand deficits by multimodal uses of (repetitive) TMS with state-of-the-art neuroimaging techniques. Sources of variance across studies are likely to be methodological in origin. They might result from different strategies to identify the cortical rTMS target position. Individual functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) data have been demonstrated to yield best spatial approximations of the most excitable TMS position compared to other techniques (Sparing et al., 2008). However, there is still a considerably large spatial mismatch between the cortical position showing highest movement-related fMRI signal and the cortical position yielding highest muscle responses when stimulated with TMS of up to 14 mm (Bastings et al., 1998; Boroojerdi et al., 1999; Herwig et al., 2002; Krings et al., 1997; Lotze et al., 2003; Sparing et al., 2008; Terao et al., 1998). The underlying cause of this spatial mismatch is unknown. Hence, the aim of the first study (Study I) of the present thesis was to test the hypothesis that the spatial mismatch between positions with highest fMRI signal change and positions with highest TMS excitability might be caused by the widely-used Gradient-Echo blood oxygenation level dependent (GRE-BOLD) fMRI technique. GRE-BOLD signal has been demonstrated to occur further downstream from the site of neural activity in large veins running on the cerebral surface (Uludag et al., 2009). Consequently, we tested the hypothesis that alternative fMRI sequences may localize neural activity (i) closer to the anatomical motor hand area, i.e. Brodmann Area 4 (BA4), and (ii) closer to the optimal TMS position than GRE-BOLD. The following alternative fMRI techniques were tested: (i) Spin-Echo (SE-BOLD) assessing blood oxygenation level dependent signal changes with decreased sensitivity for the macrovasculature at high magnetic fields (≥ 3 Tesla, Uludag et al., 2009) and (ii) arterial spin labelling (ASL), assessing local changes in cerebral blood flow (ASL-CBF) which have been shown to occur in close proximity to synaptic activity (Duong et al., 2000). GRE-BOLD, SE-BOLD, and ASL-CBF signal changes during right thumb abductions were obtained from 15 healthy young subjects at 3 Tesla. In 12 subjects, brain tissue at fMRI peak voxel coordinates was stimulated with neuronavigated TMS to investigate whether spatial differences between fMRI techniques are functionally relevant, i.e. impact on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from a contralateral target muscle, which is involved in thumb abductions. A systematic TMS motor mapping was performed to identify the most excitable TMS position (i.e. the TMS hotspot) and the centre-of-gravity (i.e. the TMS CoG), which considers the spatial distribution of excitability in the pericentral region. Euclidean distances between TMS and fMRI positions were calculated for each fMRI technique. Results indicated that highest SE-BOLD and ASL-CBF signal changes occurred in the anterior wall of the central sulcus (BA4), whereas highest GRE-BOLD signal changes occurred significantly closer to the gyral surface where most large draining veins are located. fMRI techniques were not significantly different from each other in Euclidean distances to optimal TMS positions since optimal TMS positions were located considerably more anterior (and slightly surprisingly in premotor cortex (BA6) and not BA4). Stimulation of brain tissue at GRE-BOLD peak voxel coordinates with TMS resulted in significantly higher MEPs (compared to SE-BOLD and ASL-CBF coordinates). This was probably the case because GRE-BOLD positions tended to be located at the gyral crown, which was slightly (but not significantly) closer to the TMS hotspot position. Taken together, findings of Study I suggest that spatial differences between fMRI and TMS positions are not caused by spatial unspecificity of the widely-used GRE-BOLD fMRI technique. Hnece, other factors such as complex interactions between brain tissue and the TMS induced electric field (Opitz et al., 2011), could be the underlying cause. Identification of the cortical rTMS target position is particularly challenging in stroke patients since reorganization processes after stroke may shift both, fMRI and TMS positions in unknown direction and extend (Rossini et al., 1998). In the second study (Study II) of the present thesis, we therefore tested whether findings obtained from healthy young subjects in Study I do also apply to chronic stroke patients and older (i.e. age-matched) healthy control subjects. In this study, arterial spin labelling (ASL) was used to assess CBF and BOLD signal changes simultaneously during thumb abductions with the affected/non-dominant and the unaffected/dominant hand in 15 chronic stroke patients and 13 age-matched healthy control subjects at 3 Tesla. Brain tissue at fMRI peak voxel coordinates was stimulated with neuronavigated TMS to test whether spatial differences are functionally relevant and impact on MEPs. Systematic TMS motor mappings were performed for both hemispheres in overall 12 subjects (6 stroke patients and 6 healthy subjects). Euclidean distances between fMRI and TMS positions were calculated for each hemisphere and fMRI technique. In line with results of Study I, highest ASL-CBF signal changes were located in the anterior wall of the central sulcus (BA4), whereas highest ASL-BOLD signal changes occurred significantly closer to the gyral surface. In contrast to Study I, there were no significant differences between ASL-CBF and ASL-BOLD positions in MEPs when stimulated with neuronavigated TMS, which suggests that spatial differences (in depth) were not functionally relevant for TMS applications. In line with Study I, there were no significant differences between fMRI techniques in Euclidean distances to optimal TMS positions, since optimal TMS positions were located considerably more anterior than fMRI positions (in premotor cortex, i.e. BA6). Stroke patients showed overall larger displacements (between fMRI and TMS positions) on the ipsilesional (but not the contralesional) hemisphere compared to healthy subjects. However, none of the fMRI techniques yielded positions significantly closer to the optimal TMS position. Hence, functional reorganization may impact on spatial congruence between fMRI and TMS, but the effect is similar for ASL-CBF and ASL-BOLD. Pathomechanisms underlying stroke induced motor deficits are still poorly understood but a simplified model of hemispheric competition has been suggested, which proposes relative hypoexcitability of the ipsilesional hemisphere and hyperexcitability of the contralesional hemisphere leading to pathologically increased interhemispheric inhibition from the contralesional onto the ipsilesional hemisphere during movements of the paretic hand (Duque et al., 2005; Grefkes et al., 2008b, 2010; Murase et al., 2004). In line with the model of hemispheric competition, both increasing excitability of the ipsilesional hemisphere (Khedr et al., 2005; Talelli et al., 2007) as well as decreasing excitability of the contralesional hemisphere (Fregni et al., 2006; Di Lazzaro et al., 2008a) have been demonstrated to normalize cortical excitability towards physiological levels and/or ameliorate motor performance of the stroke affected hand. However, there is considerably high inter-individual variance and some patients may even show deteriorations of motor performance after rTMS (Ameli et al., 2009). Therefore, the aim of the third study (Study III) was to identify reliable predictors for TBS effects on motor performance of the affected hand in stroke patients, which appears essential for successful implementation of TBS in neurorehabilitation. Overall, 13 chronic stroke patients with unilateral motor hand deficit and 12 age-matched healthy control subjects were included in the study. All patients received 3 different TBS interventions on 3 different days: (i) intermittent TBS (iTBS, facilitatory) over the primary motor cortex (M1) of the ipsilesional hemisphere, (ii) continuous TBS (cTBS, inhibitory) over M1 of the contralesional hemisphere, and (iii) either iTBS or cTBS over a control stimulation site (to control for placebo effects). Motor performance was measured before and after each TBS session with 3 different motor tasks and an overall motor improvement score was calculated. All subjects participated in an fMRI experiment, in which they performed rhythmic fist closures with their affected/non-dominant and unaffected/dominant hand. A laterality index (LI), reflecting laterality of fMRI signal in cortical motor areas was calculated. Effective connectivity, i.e. the direct or indirect causal influence that activity in one area exerts on activity of another area (Friston et al., 1993a), was inferred from fMRI data by means of dynamic causal modelling (DCM). Due to relatively high inter-individual variance, neither iTBS nor cTBS was significantly different from control TBS in terms of average behavioural (or electrophysiological) changes over the group of patients. However, beneficial effects of iTBS over the ipsilesional hemisphere were predicted by a unilateral fMRI activation pattern during movements of the affected hand and by the integrity of the cortical motor network. The more pronounced the promoting influence from the ipsilesional supplementary motor area (SMA) onto ipsilesional M1 and the more pronounced the inhibitory effect originating from ipsilesional M1 onto contralesional M1, the better was the behavioural response to facilitatory iTBS applied to the ipsilesional hemisphere. No significant correlations were found for behavioural improvements following cTBS or behavioural changes of the unaffected hand. Taken together, Study III yielded promising results indicating that laterality of fMRI signal and integrity of the motor network architecture constitute promising predictors for response to iTBS. In patients in whom the connectivity pattern of the ipsilesional motor network resembled physiological network connectivity patterns (i.e. preserved inhibition of the contralesional hemisphere and supportive role of the SMA of the ipsilesional hemisphere), beneficial effects of iTBS over the ipsilesional hemisphere could be observed. In contrast, patients with severely disturbed motor networks did not respond to iTBS or even deteriorated

A Systematic Review of Integrated Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Studies

Background: The capacity for TMS to elicit neural activity and manipulate cortical excitability has created significant expectation regarding its use in both cognitive and clinical neuroscience. However, the absence of an ability to quantify stimulation effects, particularly outside of the motor cortex, has led clinicians and researchers to pair noninvasive brain stimulation with noninvasive neuroimaging techniques. fNIRS, as an optical and wearable neuroimaging technique, is an ideal candidate for integrated use with TMS. Together, TMS+fNIRS may offer a hybrid alternative to “blind” stimulation to assess NIBS in therapy and research.Objective: In this systematic review, the current body of research into the transient and prolonged effects of TMS on fNIRS-based cortical hemodynamic measures while at rest and during tasks are discussed. Additionally, studies investigating the relation of fNIRS to measures of cortical excitability as produced by TMS-evoked Motor-Evoked-Potential (MEP) are evaluated. The aim of this review is to outline the integrated use of TMS+fNIRS and consolidate findings related to use of fNIRS to monitor changes attributed to TMS and the relationship of fNIRS to cortical excitability itself.Methods: Key terms were searched in PubMed and Web-of-Science to identify studies investigating the use of both fNIRS and TMS. Works from Google-Scholar and referenced works in identified papers were also assessed for relevance. All published experimental studies using both fNIRS and TMS techniques in the study methodology were included.Results: A combined literature search of neuroimaging and neurostimulation studies identified 53 papers detailing the joint use of fNIRS and TMS. 22/53 investigated the immediate effects of TMS at rest in the DLPFC and M1 as measured by fNIRS. 21/22 studies reported a significant effect in [HbO] for 40/54 stimulation conditions with 14 resulting an increase and 26 in a decrease. While 15/22 studies also reported [HbR], only 5/37 conditions were significant. Task effects of fNIRS+TMS were detailed in 16 studies, including 10 with clinical populations. Most studies only reported significant changes in [HbO] related measures. Studies comparing fNIRS to changes in MEP-measured cortical excitability suggest that fNIRS measures may be spatially more diffuse but share similar traits.Conclusion: This review summarizes the progress in the development of this emerging hybrid neuroimaging & neurostimulation methodology and its applications. Despite encouraging progress and novel applications, a lack of replicated works, along with highly disparate methodological approaches, highlight the need for further controlled studies. Interpretation of current research directions, technical challenges of TMS+fNIRS, and recommendations regarding future works are discussed

Studying the cortical state with transcranial magnetic stimulation

Cortical excitability and connectivity describe the state of the cerebral cortex. They reflect the ability of neurons to respond to input and the way information flows in the neuronal networks. These properties can be assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which enables direct and noninvasive modulation of cortical activity. Electrophysiological or hemodynamic recordings of TMS-evoked activity or behavioral measures of the stimulation effect characterize the state of the cortex during and as a result of the stimulation. In the research reported in this Thesis, the ability of TMS to inform us about the cortical state is studied from different points of view. First, we examine the relationships between different measures of cortical excitability to better understand the physiology behind them; we show how cortical background activity is related to motor cortical excitability and how the evoked responses reflect the excitability. Second, this study addresses the questions whether the TMS-evoked responses include stimulation-related artifacts, how these artifacts are generated, and how they can be avoided or removed. Specifically, we present a method to remove the artifacts from TMS-evoked electroencephalographic (EEG) signals arising as a result of cranial muscle stimulation. The use of TMS-EEG has been limited to relatively medial sites because of these artifacts, but the new method enables studying the cortical state even when stimulating areas near the cranial muscles, especially lateral sites. Finally, this work provides new information about brain function. The mechanisms how the brain processes visually guided timed motor actions are elucidated. Moreover, we show that cortical excitability as measured with TMS-evoked EEG increases during the course of wakefulness and decreases during sleep, which contributes to our understanding of what happens in the brain during wakefulness that makes us feel tired and why the brain needs sleep. The study also shows the sensitivity of the TMS-EEG measurement to changes in the state of the cortex. Accordingly, we demonstrate the power of TMS in studying the cortical state

Magnetic-Stimulation-Related Physiological Artifacts in Hemodynamic Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Signals

Peer reviewe

A Multimodal Imaging- and Stimulation-based Method of Evaluating Connectivity-related Brain Excitability in Patients with Epilepsy

Resting-state functional connectivity MRI (rs-fcMRI) is a technique that identifies connectivity between different brain regions based on correlations over time in the blood-oxygenation level dependent signal. rs-fcMRI has been applied extensively to identify abnormalities in brain connectivity in different neurologic and psychiatric diseases. However, the relationship among rs-fcMRI connectivity abnormalities, brain electrophysiology and disease state is unknown, in part because the causal significance of alterations in functional connectivity in disease pathophysiology has not been established. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is a technique that uses electromagnetic induction to noninvasively produce focal changes in cortical activity. When combined with electroencephalography (EEG), TMS can be used to assess the brain's response to external perturbations. Here we provide a protocol for combining rs-fcMRI, TMS and EEG to assess the physiologic significance of alterations in functional connectivity in patients with neuropsychiatric disease. We provide representative results from a previously published study in which rs-fcMRI was used to identify regions with abnormal connectivity in patients with epilepsy due to a malformation of cortical development, periventricular nodular heterotopia (PNH). Stimulation in patients with epilepsy resulted in abnormal TMS-evoked EEG activity relative to stimulation of the same sites in matched healthy control patients, with an abnormal increase in the late component of the TMS-evoked potential, consistent with cortical hyperexcitability. This abnormality was specific to regions with abnormal resting-state functional connectivity. Electrical source analysis in a subject with previously recorded seizures demonstrated that the origin of the abnormal TMS-evoked activity co-localized with the seizure-onset zone, suggesting the presence of an epileptogenic circuit. These results demonstrate how rs-fcMRI, TMS and EEG can be utilized together to identify and understand the physiological significance of abnormal brain connectivity in human diseases

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Neuroimaging Coregistration

The development of neuroimaging techniques is one of the most impressive advancements in neuroscience. The main reason for the widespread use of these instruments lies in their capacity to provide an accurate description of neural activity during a cognitive process or during rest. This important advancement is related to the possibility to selectively detect changes of neuronal activity in space and time by means of different biological markers. Specifically, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and nearinfrared spectroscopy (NIRS) use metabolic markers of ongoing neuronal activity to provide an accurate description of the activation of specific brain areas with high spatial resolution. Similarly, electroencephalography (EEG) is able to detect electric markers of neuronal activity, providing an accurate description of brain activation with high temporal resolution. The application of these techniques during a cognitive task allows important inferences regarding the relation between the detected neural activity, the cognitive process involved in an ongoing task, and behaviour: this is known as a \u201ccorrelational approach\u201d