Generalized selfish bin packing

Standard bin packing is the problem of partitioning a set of items with positive sizes no larger than 1 into a minimum number of subsets (called bins) each having a total size of at most 1. In bin packing games, an item has a positive weight, and given a valid packing or partition of the items, each item has a cost or a payoff associated with it. We study a class of bin packing games where the payoff of an item is the ratio between its weight and the total weight of items packed with it, that is, the cost sharing is based linearly on the weights of items. We study several types of pure Nash equilibria: standard Nash equilibria, strong equilibria, strictly Pareto optimal equilibria, and weakly Pareto optimal equilibria. We show that any game of this class admits all these types of equilibria. We study the (asymptotic) prices of anarchy and stability (PoA and PoS) of the problem with respect to these four types of equilibria, for the two cases of general weights and of unit weights. We show that while the case of general weights is strongly related to the well-known First Fit algorithm, and all the four PoA values are equal to 1.7, this is not true for unit weights. In particular, we show that all of them are strictly below 1.7, the strong PoA is equal to approximately 1.691 (another well-known number in bin packing) while the strictly Pareto optimal PoA is much lower. We show that all the PoS values are equal to 1, except for those of strong equilibria, which is equal to 1.7 for general weights, and to approximately 1.611824 for unit weights. This last value is not known to be the (asymptotic) approximation ratio of any well-known algorithm for bin packing. Finally, we study convergence to equilibria

Lower bounds for several online variants of bin packing

We consider several previously studied online variants of bin packing and prove new and improved lower bounds on the asymptotic competitive ratios for them. For that, we use a method of fully adaptive constructions. In particular, we improve the lower bound for the asymptotic competitive ratio of online square packing significantly, raising it from roughly 1.68 to above 1.75.Comment: WAOA 201

On Lazy Bin Covering and Packing problems

AbstractIn this paper, we study two interesting variants of the classical bin packing problem, called Lazy Bin Covering (LBC) and Cardinality Constrained Maximum Resource Bin Packing (CCMRBP) problems. For the offline LBC problem, we first prove the approximation ratio of the First-Fit-Decreasing and First-Fit-Increasing algorithms, then present an APTAS. For the online LBC problem, we give a competitive analysis for the algorithms of Next-Fit, Worst-Fit, First-Fit, and a modified HARMONICM algorithm. The CCMRBP problem is a generalization of the Maximum Resource Bin Packing (MRBP) problem Boyar et al. (2006) [1]. For this problem, we prove that its offline version is no harder to approximate than the offline MRBP problem