A New Computer-Aided Diagnosis System with Modified Genetic Feature Selection for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Masses in Mammograms

Mammography remains the most prevalent imaging tool for early breast cancer screening. The language used to describe abnormalities in mammographic reports is based on the breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Assigning a correct BI-RADS category to each examined mammogram is a strenuous and challenging task for even experts. This paper proposes a new and effective computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to classify mammographic masses into four assessment categories in BI-RADS. The mass regions are first enhanced by means of histogram equalization and then semiautomatically segmented based on the region growing technique. A total of 130 handcrafted BI-RADS features are then extrcated from the shape, margin, and density of each mass, together with the mass size and the patient's age, as mentioned in BI-RADS mammography. Then, a modified feature selection method based on the genetic algorithm (GA) is proposed to select the most clinically significant BI-RADS features. Finally, a back-propagation neural network (BPN) is employed for classification, and its accuracy is used as the fitness in GA. A set of 500 mammogram images from the digital database of screening mammography (DDSM) is used for evaluation. Our system achieves classification accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Matthews correlation coefficient of 84.5%, 84.4%, 94.8%, and 79.3%, respectively. To our best knowledge, this is the best current result for BI-RADS classification of breast masses in mammography, which makes the proposed system promising to support radiologists for deciding proper patient management based on the automatically assigned BI-RADS categories

Comparative Analysis of Segment Anything Model and U-Net for Breast Tumor Detection in Ultrasound and Mammography Images

In this study, the main objective is to develop an algorithm capable of identifying and delineating tumor regions in breast ultrasound (BUS) and mammographic images. The technique employs two advanced deep learning architectures, namely U-Net and pretrained SAM, for tumor segmentation. The U-Net model is specifically designed for medical image segmentation and leverages its deep convolutional neural network framework to extract meaningful features from input images. On the other hand, the pretrained SAM architecture incorporates a mechanism to capture spatial dependencies and generate segmentation results. Evaluation is conducted on a diverse dataset containing annotated tumor regions in BUS and mammographic images, covering both benign and malignant tumors. This dataset enables a comprehensive assessment of the algorithm's performance across different tumor types. Results demonstrate that the U-Net model outperforms the pretrained SAM architecture in accurately identifying and segmenting tumor regions in both BUS and mammographic images. The U-Net exhibits superior performance in challenging cases involving irregular shapes, indistinct boundaries, and high tumor heterogeneity. In contrast, the pretrained SAM architecture exhibits limitations in accurately identifying tumor areas, particularly for malignant tumors and objects with weak boundaries or complex shapes. These findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate deep learning architectures tailored for medical image segmentation. The U-Net model showcases its potential as a robust and accurate tool for tumor detection, while the pretrained SAM architecture suggests the need for further improvements to enhance segmentation performance

Deep-Learning-Based Computer- Aided Systems for Breast Cancer Imaging: A Critical Review

[EN] This paper provides a critical review of the literature on deep learning applications in breast tumor diagnosis using ultrasound and mammography images. It also summarizes recent advances in computer-aided diagnosis/detection (CAD) systems, which make use of new deep learning methods to automatically recognize breast images and improve the accuracy of diagnoses made by radiologists. This review is based upon published literature in the past decade (January 2010-January 2020), where we obtained around 250 research articles, and after an eligibility process, 59 articles were presented in more detail. The main findings in the classification process revealed that new DL-CAD methods are useful and effective screening tools for breast cancer, thus reducing the need for manual feature extraction. The breast tumor research community can utilize this survey as a basis for their current and future studies.This project has been co-financed by the Spanish Government Grant PID2019-107790RB-C22, "Software development for a continuous PET crystal systems applied to breast cancer".Jiménez-Gaona, Y.; Rodríguez Álvarez, MJ.; Lakshminarayanan, V. (2020). Deep-Learning-Based Computer- Aided Systems for Breast Cancer Imaging: A Critical Review. Applied Sciences. 10(22):1-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228298S1291022Jemal, A., Bray, F., Center, M. M., Ferlay, J., Ward, E., & Forman, D. (2011). Global cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 61(2), 69-90. doi:10.3322/caac.20107Gao, F., Chia, K.-S., Ng, F.-C., Ng, E.-H., & Machin, D. (2002). Interval cancers following breast cancer screening in Singaporean women. International Journal of Cancer, 101(5), 475-479. doi:10.1002/ijc.10636Munir, K., Elahi, H., Ayub, A., Frezza, F., & Rizzi, A. (2019). Cancer Diagnosis Using Deep Learning: A Bibliographic Review. Cancers, 11(9), 1235. doi:10.3390/cancers11091235Nahid, A.-A., & Kong, Y. (2017). Involvement of Machine Learning for Breast Cancer Image Classification: A Survey. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2017, 1-29. doi:10.1155/2017/3781951Ramadan, S. Z. (2020). Methods Used in Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Cancer Detection Using Mammograms: A Review. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2020, 1-21. doi:10.1155/2020/9162464CHAN, H.-P., DOI, K., VYBRONY, C. J., SCHMIDT, R. A., METZ, C. E., LAM, K. L., … MACMAHON, H. (1990). Improvement in Radiologists?? Detection of Clustered Microcalcifications on Mammograms. Investigative Radiology, 25(10), 1102-1110. doi:10.1097/00004424-199010000-00006Olsen, O., & Gøtzsche, P. C. (2001). Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. The Lancet, 358(9290), 1340-1342. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06449-2Mann, R. M., Kuhl, C. K., Kinkel, K., & Boetes, C. (2008). Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. European Radiology, 18(7), 1307-1318. doi:10.1007/s00330-008-0863-7Jalalian, A., Mashohor, S. B. T., Mahmud, H. R., Saripan, M. I. B., Ramli, A. R. B., & Karasfi, B. (2013). Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review. Clinical Imaging, 37(3), 420-426. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.09.024Sarno, A., Mettivier, G., & Russo, P. (2015). Dedicated breast computed tomography: Basic aspects. Medical Physics, 42(6Part1), 2786-2804. doi:10.1118/1.4919441Njor, S., Nyström, L., Moss, S., Paci, E., Broeders, M., Segnan, N., & Lynge, E. (2012). Breast Cancer Mortality in Mammographic Screening in Europe: A Review of Incidence-Based Mortality Studies. Journal of Medical Screening, 19(1_suppl), 33-41. doi:10.1258/jms.2012.012080Morrell, S., Taylor, R., Roder, D., & Dobson, A. (2012). Mammography screening and breast cancer mortality in Australia: an aggregate cohort study. Journal of Medical Screening, 19(1), 26-34. doi:10.1258/jms.2012.011127Marmot, M. G., Altman, D. G., Cameron, D. A., Dewar, J. A., Thompson, S. G., & Wilcox, M. (2013). The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. British Journal of Cancer, 108(11), 2205-2240. doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.177Pisano, E. D., Gatsonis, C., Hendrick, E., Yaffe, M., Baum, J. K., Acharyya, S., … Rebner, M. (2005). Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening. New England Journal of Medicine, 353(17), 1773-1783. doi:10.1056/nejmoa052911Carney, P. A., Miglioretti, D. L., Yankaskas, B. C., Kerlikowske, K., Rosenberg, R., Rutter, C. M., … Ballard-Barbash, R. (2003). Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(3), 168. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008Woodard, D. B., Gelfand, A. E., Barlow, W. E., & Elmore, J. G. (2007). Performance assessment for radiologists interpreting screening mammography. Statistics in Medicine, 26(7), 1532-1551. doi:10.1002/sim.2633Cole, E. B., Pisano, E. D., Kistner, E. O., Muller, K. E., Brown, M. E., Feig, S. A., … Braeuning, M. P. (2003). Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mammography in Patients with Dense Breasts Who Underwent Problem-solving Mammography: Effects of Image Processing and Lesion Type. Radiology, 226(1), 153-160. doi:10.1148/radiol.2261012024Boyd, N. F., Guo, H., Martin, L. J., Sun, L., Stone, J., Fishell, E., … Yaffe, M. J. (2007). Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 356(3), 227-236. doi:10.1056/nejmoa062790Bird, R. E., Wallace, T. W., & Yankaskas, B. C. (1992). Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology, 184(3), 613-617. doi:10.1148/radiology.184.3.1509041Kerlikowske, K. (2000). Performance of Screening Mammography among Women with and without a First-Degree Relative with Breast Cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine, 133(11), 855. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-133-11-200012050-00009Nunes, F. L. S., Schiabel, H., & Goes, C. E. (2006). Contrast Enhancement in Dense Breast Images to Aid Clustered Microcalcifications Detection. Journal of Digital Imaging, 20(1), 53-66. doi:10.1007/s10278-005-6976-5Dinnes, J., Moss, S., Melia, J., Blanks, R., Song, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2001). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading of mammograms in breast cancer screening: findings of a systematic review. The Breast, 10(6), 455-463. doi:10.1054/brst.2001.0350Robinson, P. J. (1997). Radiology’s Achilles’ heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Röntgen image. The British Journal of Radiology, 70(839), 1085-1098. doi:10.1259/bjr.70.839.9536897Rangayyan, R. M., Ayres, F. J., & Leo Desautels, J. E. (2007). A review of computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: Toward the detection of subtle signs. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 344(3-4), 312-348. doi:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2006.09.003Vyborny, C. J., Giger, M. L., & Nishikawa, R. M. (2000). COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION AND DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 38(4), 725-740. doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70197-4Giger, M. L. (2018). Machine Learning in Medical Imaging. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 15(3), 512-520. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.028Xu, Y., Wang, Y., Yuan, J., Cheng, Q., Wang, X., & Carson, P. L. (2019). Medical breast ultrasound image segmentation by machine learning. Ultrasonics, 91, 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2018.07.006Shan, J., Alam, S. K., Garra, B., Zhang, Y., & Ahmed, T. (2016). Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Ultrasound Using Computerized BI-RADS Features and Machine Learning Methods. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 42(4), 980-988. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.11.016Zhang, Q., Xiao, Y., Dai, W., Suo, J., Wang, C., Shi, J., & Zheng, H. (2016). Deep learning based classification of breast tumors with shear-wave elastography. Ultrasonics, 72, 150-157. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2016.08.004Cheng, J.-Z., Ni, D., Chou, Y.-H., Qin, J., Tiu, C.-M., Chang, Y.-C., … Chen, C.-M. (2016). Computer-Aided Diagnosis with Deep Learning Architecture: Applications to Breast Lesions in US Images and Pulmonary Nodules in CT Scans. Scientific Reports, 6(1). doi:10.1038/srep24454Shin, S. Y., Lee, S., Yun, I. D., Kim, S. M., & Lee, K. M. (2019). Joint Weakly and Semi-Supervised Deep Learning for Localization and Classification of Masses in Breast Ultrasound Images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 38(3), 762-774. doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2872031Wang, J., Ding, H., Bidgoli, F. A., Zhou, B., Iribarren, C., Molloi, S., & Baldi, P. (2017). Detecting Cardiovascular Disease from Mammograms With Deep Learning. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 36(5), 1172-1181. doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2655486Kooi, T., Litjens, G., van Ginneken, B., Gubern-Mérida, A., Sánchez, C. I., Mann, R., … Karssemeijer, N. (2017). Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions. Medical Image Analysis, 35, 303-312. doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.07.007Debelee, T. G., Schwenker, F., Ibenthal, A., & Yohannes, D. (2019). Survey of deep learning in breast cancer image analysis. Evolving Systems, 11(1), 143-163. doi:10.1007/s12530-019-09297-2Keen, J. D., Keen, J. M., & Keen, J. E. (2018). Utilization of Computer-Aided Detection for Digital Screening Mammography in the United States, 2008 to 2016. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 15(1), 44-48. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.033Henriksen, E. L., Carlsen, J. F., Vejborg, I. M., Nielsen, M. B., & Lauridsen, C. A. (2018). The efficacy of using computer-aided detection (CAD) for detection of breast cancer in mammography screening: a systematic review. Acta Radiologica, 60(1), 13-18. doi:10.1177/0284185118770917Gao, Y., Geras, K. J., Lewin, A. A., & Moy, L. (2019). New Frontiers: An Update on Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Imaging in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. American Journal of Roentgenology, 212(2), 300-307. doi:10.2214/ajr.18.20392Pacilè, S., Lopez, J., Chone, P., Bertinotti, T., Grouin, J. M., & Fillard, P. (2020). Improving Breast Cancer Detection Accuracy of Mammography with the Concurrent Use of an Artificial Intelligence Tool. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence, 2(6), e190208. doi:10.1148/ryai.2020190208Huynh, B. Q., Li, H., & Giger, M. L. (2016). Digital mammographic tumor classification using transfer learning from deep convolutional neural networks. Journal of Medical Imaging, 3(3), 034501. doi:10.1117/1.jmi.3.3.034501Yap, M. H., Pons, G., Marti, J., Ganau, S., Sentis, M., Zwiggelaar, R., … Marti, R. (2018). Automated Breast Ultrasound Lesions Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 22(4), 1218-1226. doi:10.1109/jbhi.2017.2731873Moon, W. K., Lee, Y.-W., Ke, H.-H., Lee, S. H., Huang, C.-S., & Chang, R.-F. (2020). Computer‐aided diagnosis of breast ultrasound images using ensemble learning from convolutional neural networks. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 190, 105361. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105361LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444. doi:10.1038/nature14539Miotto, R., Wang, F., Wang, S., Jiang, X., & Dudley, J. T. (2017). Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 19(6), 1236-1246. doi:10.1093/bib/bbx044Shin, H.-C., Roth, H. R., Gao, M., Lu, L., Xu, Z., Nogues, I., … Summers, R. M. (2016). Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 35(5), 1285-1298. doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2528162Lee, J.-G., Jun, S., Cho, Y.-W., Lee, H., Kim, G. B., Seo, J. B., & Kim, N. (2017). Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: General Overview. Korean Journal of Radiology, 18(4), 570. doi:10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.570Suzuki, K. (2017). Overview of deep learning in medical imaging. Radiological Physics and Technology, 10(3), 257-273. doi:10.1007/s12194-017-0406-5Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336-341. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), 118-121. doi:10.1177/014107680309600304Han, S., Kang, H.-K., Jeong, J.-Y., Park, M.-H., Kim, W., Bang, W.-C., & Seong, Y.-K. (2017). A deep learning framework for supporting the classification of breast lesions in ultrasound images. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 62(19), 7714-7728. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aa82ecMoreira, I. C., Amaral, I., Domingues, I., Cardoso, A., Cardoso, M. J., & Cardoso, J. S. (2012). INbreast. Academic Radiology, 19(2), 236-248. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2011.09.014Abdelhafiz, D., Yang, C., Ammar, R., & Nabavi, S. (2019). Deep convolutional neural networks for mammography: advances, challenges and applications. BMC Bioinformatics, 20(S11). doi:10.1186/s12859-019-2823-4Byra, M., Jarosik, P., Szubert, A., Galperin, M., Ojeda-Fournier, H., Olson, L., … Andre, M. (2020). Breast mass segmentation in ultrasound with selective kernel U-Net convolutional neural network. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 61, 102027. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102027Jiao, Z., Gao, X., Wang, Y., & Li, J. (2016). A deep feature based framework for breast masses classification. Neurocomputing, 197, 221-231. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.02.060Arevalo, J., González, F. A., Ramos-Pollán, R., Oliveira, J. L., & Guevara Lopez, M. A. (2016). Representation learning for mammography mass lesion classification with convolutional neural networks. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 127, 248-257. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.12.014Peng, W., Mayorga, R. V., & Hussein, E. M. A. (2016). An automated confirmatory system for analysis of mammograms. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 125, 134-144. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.09.019Al-Dhabyani, W., Gomaa, M., Khaled, H., & Fahmy, A. (2020). Dataset of breast ultrasound images. Data in Brief, 28, 104863. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2019.104863Piotrzkowska-Wróblewska, H., Dobruch-Sobczak, K., Byra, M., & Nowicki, A. (2017). Open access database of raw ultrasonic signals acquired from malignant and benign breast lesions. Medical Physics, 44(11), 6105-6109. doi:10.1002/mp.12538Fujita, H. (2020). AI-based computer-aided diagnosis (AI-CAD): the latest review to read first. Radiological Physics and Technology, 13(1), 6-19. doi:10.1007/s12194-019-00552-4Sengupta, S., Singh, A., Leopold, H. A., Gulati, T., & Lakshminarayanan, V. (2020). Ophthalmic diagnosis using deep learning with fundus images – A critical review. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 102, 101758. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101758Ganesan, K., Acharya, U. R., Chua, K. C., Min, L. C., & Abraham, K. T. (2013). Pectoral muscle segmentation: A review. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 110(1), 48-57. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.10.020Huang, Q., Luo, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2017). Breast ultrasound image segmentation: a survey. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 12(3), 493-507. doi:10.1007/s11548-016-1513-1Noble, J. A., & Boukerroui, D. (2006). Ultrasound image segmentation: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 25(8), 987-1010. doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.877092Kallergi, M., Woods, K., Clarke, L. P., Qian, W., & Clark, R. A. (1992). Image segmentation in digital mammography: Comparison of local thresholding and region growing algorithms. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 16(5), 323-331. doi:10.1016/0895-6111(92)90145-yTsantis, S., Dimitropoulos, N., Cavouras, D., & Nikiforidis, G. (2006). A hybrid multi-scale model for thyroid nodule boundary detection on ultrasound images. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 84(2-3), 86-98. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2006.09.006Ilesanmi, A. E., Idowu, O. P., & Makhanov, S. S. (2020). Multiscale superpixel method for segmentation of breast ultrasound. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 125, 103879. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103879Chen, D.-R., Chang, R.-F., Kuo, W.-J., Chen, M.-C., & Huang, Y. .-L. (2002). Diagnosis of breast tumors with sonographic texture analysis using wavelet transform and neural networks. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 28(10), 1301-1310. doi:10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00620-8Cheng, H. D., Shan, J., Ju, W., Guo, Y., & Zhang, L. (2010). Automated breast cancer detection and classification using ultrasound images: A survey. Pattern Recognition, 43(1), 299-317. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2009.05.012Chan, H.-P., Wei, D., Helvie, M. A., Sahiner, B., Adler, D. D., Goodsitt, M. M., & Petrick, N. (1995). Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 40(5), 857-876. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/40/5/010Tanaka, T., Torii, S., Kabuta, I., Shimizu, K., & Tanaka, M. (2007). Pattern Classification of Nevus with Texture Analysis. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 3(1), 143-150. doi:10.1002/tee.20246Singh, B., Jain, V. K., & Singh, S. (2014). Mammogram Mass Classification Using Support Vector Machine with Texture, Shape Features and Hierarchical Centroid Method. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 4(5), 687-696. doi:10.1166/jmihi.2014.1312Pal, N. R., Bhowmick, B., Patel, S. K., Pal, S., & Das, J. (2008). A multi-stage neural network aided system for detection of microcalcifications in digitized mammograms. Neurocomputing, 71(13-15), 2625-2634. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2007.06.015Ayer, T., Chen, Q., & Burnside, E. S. (2013). Artificial Neural Networks in Mammography Interpretation and Diagnostic Decision Making. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2013, 1-10. doi:10.1155/2013/832509Sumbaly, R., Vishnusri, N., & Jeyalatha, S. (2014). Diagnosis of Breast Cancer using Decision Tree Data Mining Technique. International Journal of Computer Applications, 98(10), 16-24. doi:10.5120/17219-7456Landwehr, N., Hall, M., & Frank, E. (2005). Logistic Model Trees. Machine Learning, 59(1-2), 161-205. doi:10.1007/s10994-005-0466-3Abdel-Zaher, A. M., & Eldeib, A. M. (2016). Breast cancer classification using deep belief networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 46, 139-144. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.015Nishikawa, R. M., Giger, M. L., Doi, K., Metz, C. E., Yin, F.-F., Vyborny, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Medical Physics, 21(2), 265-269. doi:10.1118/1.597287Guo, R., Lu, G., Qin, B., & Fei, B. (2018). Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 44(1), 37-70. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.09.012Kang, C.-C., Wang, W.-J., & Kang, C.-H. (2012). Image segmentation with complicated background by using seeded region growing. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 66(9), 767-771. doi:10.1016/j.aeue.2012.01.011Prabusankarlal, K. M., Thirumoorthy, P., & Manavalan, R. (2014). Computer Aided Breast Cancer Diagnosis Techniques in Ultrasound: A Survey. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 4(3), 331-349. doi:10.1166/jmihi.2014.1269Abdallah, Y. M., Elgak, S., Zain, H., Rafiq, M., A. Ebaid, E., & A. Elnaema, A. (2018). Breast cancer detection using image enhancement and segmentation algorithms. Biomedical Research, 29(20). doi:10.4066/biomedicalresearch.29-18-1106K.U, S., & S, G. R. (2016). Objective Quality Assessment of Image Enhancement Methods in Digital Mammography - A Comparative Study. Signal & Image Processing : An International Journal, 7(4), 01-13. doi:10.5121/sipij.2016.7401Pizer, S. M., Amburn, E. P., Austin, J. D., Cromartie, R., Geselowitz, A., Greer, T., … Zuiderveld, K. (1987). Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 39(3), 355-368. doi:10.1016/s0734-189x(87)80186-xPisano, E. D., Zong, S., Hemminger, B. M., DeLuca, M., Johnston, R. E., Muller, K., … Pizer, S. M. (1998). Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms. Journal of Digital Imaging, 11(4), 193-200. doi:10.1007/bf03178082Wan, J., Yin, H., Chong, A.-X., & Liu, Z.-H. (2020). Progressive residual networks for image super-resolution. Applied Intelligence, 50(5), 1620-1632. doi:10.1007/s10489-019-01548-8Umehara, K., Ota, J., & Ishida, T. (2017). Super-Resolution Imaging of Mammograms Based on the Super-Resolution Convolutional Neural Network. Open Journal of Medical Imaging, 07(04), 180-195. doi:10.4236/ojmi.2017.74018Dong, C., Loy, C. C., He, K., & Tang, X. (2016). Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 38(2), 295-307. doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2439281Jiang, Y., & Li, J. (2020). Generative Adversarial Network for Image Super-Resolution Combining Texture Loss. Applied Sciences, 10(5), 1729. doi:10.3390/app10051729Schultz, R. R., & Stevenson, R. L. (1994). A Bayesian approach to image expansion for improved definition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 3(3), 233-242. doi:10.1109/83.287017Lei Zhang, & Xiaolin Wu. (2006). An edge-guided image interpolation algorithm via directional filtering and data fusion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(8), 2226-2238. doi:10.1109/tip.2006.877407Shorten, C., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2019). A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning. Journal of Big Data, 6(1). doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0Weiss, K., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., & Wang, D. (2016). A survey of transfer learning. Journal of Big Data, 3(1). doi:10.1186/s40537-016-0043-6Ling Shao, Fan Zhu, & Xuelong Li. (2015). Transfer Learning for Visual Categorization: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Syste

Analyzing the breast tissue in mammograms using deep learning

La densitat mamogràfica de la mama (MBD) reflecteix la quantitat d'àrea fibroglandular del teixit mamari que apareix blanca i brillant a les mamografies, comunament coneguda com a densitat percentual de la mama (PD%). El MBD és un factor de risc per al càncer de mama i un factor de risc per emmascarar tumors. Tot i això, l'estimació precisa de la DMO amb avaluació visual continua sent un repte a causa del contrast feble i de les variacions significatives en els teixits grassos de fons en les mamografies. A més, la interpretació correcta de les imatges de mamografia requereix experts mèdics altament capacitats: És difícil, laboriós, car i propens a errors. No obstant això, el teixit mamari dens pot dificultar la identificació del càncer de mama i associar-se amb un risc més gran de càncer de mama. Per exemple, s'ha informat que les dones amb una alta densitat mamària en comparació amb les dones amb una densitat mamària baixa tenen un risc de quatre a sis vegades més gran de desenvolupar la malaltia. La clau principal de la computació de densitat de mama i la classificació de densitat de mama és detectar correctament els teixits densos a les imatges mamogràfiques. S'han proposat molts mètodes per estimar la densitat mamària; no obstant això, la majoria no estan automatitzats. A més, s'han vist greument afectats per la baixa relació senyal-soroll i la variabilitat de la densitat en aparença i textura. Seria més útil tenir un sistema de diagnòstic assistit per ordinador (CAD) per ajudar el metge a analitzar-lo i diagnosticar-lo automàticament. El desenvolupament actual de mètodes daprenentatge profund ens motiva a millorar els sistemes actuals danàlisi de densitat mamària. L'enfocament principal de la present tesi és desenvolupar un sistema per automatitzar l'anàlisi de densitat de la mama ( tal com; Segmentació de densitat de mama (BDS), percentatge de densitat de mama (BDP) i classificació de densitat de mama (BDC) ), utilitzant tècniques d'aprenentatge profund i aplicant-la a les mamografies temporals després del tractament per analitzar els canvis de densitat de mama per trobar un pacient perillós i sospitós.La densidad mamográfica de la mama (MBD) refleja la cantidad de área fibroglandular del tejido mamario que aparece blanca y brillante en las mamografías, comúnmente conocida como densidad porcentual de la mama (PD%). El MBD es un factor de riesgo para el cáncer de mama y un factor de riesgo para enmascarar tumores. Sin embargo, la estimación precisa de la DMO con evaluación visual sigue siendo un reto debido al contraste débil y a las variaciones significativas en los tejidos grasos de fondo en las mamografías. Además, la interpretación correcta de las imágenes de mamografía requiere de expertos médicos altamente capacitados: Es difícil, laborioso, caro y propenso a errores. Sin embargo, el tejido mamario denso puede dificultar la identificación del cáncer de mama y asociarse con un mayor riesgo de cáncer de mama. Por ejemplo, se ha informado que las mujeres con una alta densidad mamaria en comparación con las mujeres con una densidad mamaria baja tienen un riesgo de cuatro a seis veces mayor de desarrollar la enfermedad. La clave principal de la computación de densidad de mama y la clasificación de densidad de mama es detectar correctamente los tejidos densos en las imágenes mamográficas. Se han propuesto muchos métodos para la estimación de la densidad mamaria; sin embargo, la mayoría de ellos no están automatizados. Además, se han visto gravemente afectados por la baja relación señal-ruido y la variabilidad de la densidad en apariencia y textura. Sería más útil disponer de un sistema de diagnóstico asistido por ordenador (CAD) para ayudar al médico a analizarlo y diagnosticarlo automáticamente. El desarrollo actual de métodos de aprendizaje profundo nos motiva a mejorar los sistemas actuales de análisis de densidad mamaria. El enfoque principal de la presente tesis es desarrollar un sistema para automatizar el análisis de densidad de la mama ( tal como; Segmentación de densidad de mama (BDS), porcentaje de densidad de mama (BDP) y clasificación de densidad de mama (BDC)), utilizando técnicas de aprendizaje profundo y aplicándola en las mamografías temporales después del tratamiento para analizar los cambios de densidad de mama para encontrar un paciente peligroso y sospechoso.Mammographic breast density (MBD) reflects the amount of fibroglandular breast tissue area that appears white and bright on mammograms, commonly referred to as breast percent density (PD%). MBD is a risk factor for breast cancer and a risk factor for masking tumors. However, accurate MBD estimation with visual assessment is still a challenge due to faint contrast and significant variations in background fatty tissues in mammograms. In addition, correctly interpreting mammogram images requires highly trained medical experts: it is difficult, time-consuming, expensive, and error-prone. Nevertheless, dense breast tissue can make it harder to identify breast cancer and be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. For example, it has been reported that women with a high breast density compared to women with a low breast density have a four- to six-fold increased risk of developing the disease. The primary key of breast density computing and breast density classification is to detect the dense tissues in the mammographic images correctly. Many methods have been proposed for breast density estimation; however, most are not automated. Besides, they have been badly affected by low signal-to-noise ratio and variability of density in appearance and texture. It would be more helpful to have a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to assist the doctor analyze and diagnosing it automatically. Current development in deep learning methods motivates us to improve current breast density analysis systems. The main focus of the present thesis is to develop a system for automating the breast density analysis ( such as; breast density segmentation(BDS), breast density percentage (BDP), and breast density classification ( BDC)), using deep learning techniques and applying it on the temporal mammograms after treatment for analyzing the breast density changes to find a risky and suspicious patient

Breast cancer diagnosis: a survey of pre-processing, segmentation, feature extraction and classification

Machine learning methods have been an interesting method in the field of medical for many years, and they have achieved successful results in various fields of medical science. This paper examines the effects of using machine learning algorithms in the diagnosis and classification of breast cancer from mammography imaging data. Cancer diagnosis is the identification of images as cancer or non-cancer, and this involves image preprocessing, feature extraction, classification, and performance analysis. This article studied 93 different references mentioned in the previous years in the field of processing and tries to find an effective way to diagnose and classify breast cancer. Based on the results of this research, it can be concluded that most of today’s successful methods focus on the use of deep learning methods. Finding a new method requires an overview of existing methods in the field of deep learning methods in order to make a comparison and case study

DEEP LEARNING BASED SEGMENTATION AND CLASSIFICATION FOR IMPROVED BREAST CANCER DETECTION

Breast Cancer is a leading killer of women globally. It is a serious health concern caused by calcifications or abnormal tissue growth in the breast. Doing a screening and identifying the nature of the tumor as benign or malignant is important to facilitate early intervention, which drastically decreases the mortality rate. Usually, it uses ultrasound images, since they are easily accessible to most people and have no drawbacks as such, unlike in the other most famous screening technique of mammograms where in some cases you may not get a clear scan. In this thesis, the approach to this problem is to build a stacked model which makes predictions on the basis of the shape, pattern, and spread of the tumor. To achieve this, typical steps are pre-processing of images followed by segmentation of the image and classification. For pre-processing, the proposed approach in this thesis uses histogram equalization that helps in improving the contrast of the image, making the tumor stand out from its surroundings, and making it easier for the segmentation step. Through segmentation, the approach uses UNet architecture with a ResNet backbone. The UNet architecture is made specifically for biomedical imaging. The aim of segmentation is to separate the tumor from the ultrasound image so that the classification model can make its predictions from this mask. The metric result of the F1-score for the segmentation model turned out to be 97.30%. For classification, the CNN base model is used for feature extraction from provided masks. These are then fed into a network and the predictions are done. The base CNN model used is ResNet50 and the neural network used for the output layer is a simple 8-layer network with ReLU activation in the hidden layers and softmax in the final decision-making layer. The ResNet weights are initialized from training on ImageNet. The ResNet50 returns 2048 features from each mask. These are then fed into the network for decision-making. The hidden layers of the neural network have 1024, 512, 256, 128, 64, 32, and 10 neurons respectively. The classification accuracy achieved for the proposed model was 98.61% with an F1 score of 98.41%. The detailed experimental results are presented along with comparative data