92,436 research outputs found
Interference Effects in Quantum Belief Networks
Probabilistic graphical models such as Bayesian Networks are one of the most
powerful structures known by the Computer Science community for deriving
probabilistic inferences. However, modern cognitive psychology has revealed
that human decisions could not follow the rules of classical probability
theory, because humans cannot process large amounts of data in order to make
judgements. Consequently, the inferences performed are based on limited data
coupled with several heuristics, leading to violations of the law of total
probability. This means that probabilistic graphical models based on classical
probability theory are too limited to fully simulate and explain various
aspects of human decision making.
Quantum probability theory was developed in order to accommodate the
paradoxical findings that the classical theory could not explain. Recent
findings in cognitive psychology revealed that quantum probability can fully
describe human decisions in an elegant framework. Their findings suggest that,
before taking a decision, human thoughts are seen as superposed waves that can
interfere with each other, influencing the final decision.
In this work, we propose a new Bayesian Network based on the psychological
findings of cognitive scientists. We made experiments with two very well known
Bayesian Networks from the literature. The results obtained revealed that the
quantum like Bayesian Network can affect drastically the probabilistic
inferences, specially when the levels of uncertainty of the network are very
high (no pieces of evidence observed). When the levels of uncertainty are very
low, then the proposed quantum like network collapses to its classical
counterpart
Dynamic Bayesian Combination of Multiple Imperfect Classifiers
Classifier combination methods need to make best use of the outputs of
multiple, imperfect classifiers to enable higher accuracy classifications. In
many situations, such as when human decisions need to be combined, the base
decisions can vary enormously in reliability. A Bayesian approach to such
uncertain combination allows us to infer the differences in performance between
individuals and to incorporate any available prior knowledge about their
abilities when training data is sparse. In this paper we explore Bayesian
classifier combination, using the computationally efficient framework of
variational Bayesian inference. We apply the approach to real data from a large
citizen science project, Galaxy Zoo Supernovae, and show that our method far
outperforms other established approaches to imperfect decision combination. We
go on to analyse the putative community structure of the decision makers, based
on their inferred decision making strategies, and show that natural groupings
are formed. Finally we present a dynamic Bayesian classifier combination
approach and investigate the changes in base classifier performance over time.Comment: 35 pages, 12 figure
- …