823 research outputs found

    Sensitivity Analysis of Incentive Situations and Personal Attributes to Driving Anger Based on MNL Model: A Naturalistic Experimental Study

    Get PDF
    Driving anger, called "road rage", has gradually become universal phenomenon nowadays, which has been a concern to traffic management authorities. It is necessary to figure out impacting degree of the influencing factors on driving anger for taking the corresponding intervening measures. Forty drivers were enrolled to conduct naturalistic experiments on a busy route in Wuhan, China, where drivers\u27 anger can be induced by various incentive situations including jaywalking, weaving/cutting in line, traffic congestion and red light with extra paid if completing the experiment ahead of reference time. According to behavioral theory and disaggregation theory, the influencing factors including the incentive situations and personal attributes (i.e. gender, age, temperament) were determined for proposing driving anger prediction model based on MNL (multinomial logit). Then, the sensitivity of each influencing factor on driving anger was analyzed by elasticity theory on the basis of the proposed model. The result indicates that age, temperament and illegal behaviors from surrounding people are decisive influencing factors to driving anger sates with different intensity because their average elasticity values for none anger (neutral), low anger, medium anger, high anger are 1.254, 2.713, 2.914, respectively, which are all bigger than 1. Moreover, the accuracy of the proposed model is 78.30%. The results can provide theoretical support for developing key monitoring or targeted intervention to deal with the decisive influencing factors for traffic management authorities

    Driver lane change intention inference for intelligent vehicles: framework, survey, and challenges

    Get PDF
    Intelligent vehicles and advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) need to have proper awareness of the traffic context as well as the driver status since ADAS share the vehicle control authorities with the human driver. This study provides an overview of the ego-vehicle driver intention inference (DII), which mainly focus on the lane change intention on highways. First, a human intention mechanism is discussed in the beginning to gain an overall understanding of the driver intention. Next, the ego-vehicle driver intention is classified into different categories based on various criteria. A complete DII system can be separated into different modules, which consists of traffic context awareness, driver states monitoring, and the vehicle dynamic measurement module. The relationship between these modules and the corresponding impacts on the DII are analyzed. Then, the lane change intention inference (LCII) system is reviewed from the perspective of input signals, algorithms, and evaluation. Finally, future concerns and emerging trends in this area are highlighted

    Age, Health, and Driving Ability: Perceptions of Older Adults

    Get PDF
    This paper presents the results of a focus group study exploring older individuals\u27 perceptions of older drivers. The study extends the stereotype research of Joanisse, Gagnon, and Voloaca (2012b), further investigating the terms used to describe older drivers. Also explored were the ways older adults perceive age versus health in their considerations of driving. Three focus groups (N=24) were conducted with former and current drivers, 64 years and older, living in Asheville, North Carolina. Participants showed positivity in their descriptions of older drivers as slow and cautious and believed they adapted their driving behavior as aging demanded. Participants showed heterogeneity in their acceptance of the health issues that threatened their continued driving ability. The importance of context in understanding stereotypes of older adults is illustrated. Results are discussed in terms of ingroup/outgroup theory in line with the proposed model

    Exploration of Older Adultsโ€™ Travel Behavior and Their Transportation Barriers

    Get PDF
    Both the number of older adults and their proportion of the population are increasing rapidly in the United States. By 2040, about 20.7% of the U.S. population will be 65 and older (Harrison & Ragland, 2003a). These dramatic changes in the composition of the population will bring new challenges to the provision of transportation services. This is because the travel patterns and needs of older adults are likely to become more complicated. A growing number of people will find it increasingly difficult to meet their transportation needs. As the life expectancy of older adults is likely to continue to increase, a greater number of older people will face mobility issues alone (Alsnih & Hensher, 2003). Researchers widely agree that the aging population in the U.S. relies heavily on cars (as drivers or passengers) because they are convenient, flexible, and allow them to live independently and participate in normal daily activities (Haustein, 2012; Rosenbloom, 2005). However, dispersed land use patterns in the United States, the growing number of older adults living in suburban areas, and the current transportation infrastructure in the country make the use of a car a necessity rather than an option for a large proportion of older adults. However, as they age, their physical and mental health deteriorates, making driving dangerous for them. Therefore, it is of great importance to understand the transportation problems of older adults and provide them with reliable and acceptable alternative modes of transportation to help them meet their transportation needs. The study presented here aims to examine the transportation problems of older adults living in urban and suburban areas, make policy recommendations, and identify effective strategies to help them meet their mobility needs. To this end, the study used a mixed-method approach to identify the factors that influence older adults\u27 travel behavior and the issues they face when walking, biking, and using transit. In-depth, one-on-one surveys were conducted in three counties in southeastern Wisconsin with 178 English-speaking older adults aged 65 and older living independently in institutionalized senior housing (i.e., subsidized housing and retirement communities) and in noninstitutionalized buildings. The first main chapter of the thesis (Chapter 4) examines the factors that influence older adults\u27 mode choice for grocery shopping and aims to predict older adults\u27 travel behavior for going to the grocery store. A quantitative analysis involving statistical and machine learning techniques was conducted with older adults who traveled to the grocery store by car, carpool, walking, or public transit (N=153). The results of the study show that household car ownership and having a valid driver\u27s license are the most important factors influencing travel mode choice by older adults. However, age group (65-74 or 75+) and physical disability were not significant factors influencing older adults\u27 choice of transportation mode for grocery shopping. The second main chapter of this study (Chapter 5) examines the reasons why older adults who hold a valid driver\u27s license intend to renew their license when it expires (yes), or whether they do not intend to do so or are hesitant (no/not sure). Using a mixed-method approach including binomial logit regression and qualitative analysis, 116 older adults were surveyed. Results suggest that being 75 years of age and older, having a physical disability, and having a lower level of education (high school and below) negatively influence older adults\u27 decision to renew their driver\u27s license. Older adults who drive frequently and indicate that they would like to be able to drive to destinations easily are more likely to renew their driver\u27s license after it expires. The third main chapter of this thesis (Chapter 6) aims to examine the barriers and challenges older adults face when using modes of transportation other than the personal automobile, such as walking, bicycling, public transit, and ride-hailing. A qualitative content analysis of the 103 open-ended responses was used to fit the results into an ecological model. The study recommends four main actions to help policymakers and city governments overcome these barriers: (1) implement transportation education and outreach programs, (2) improve accessibility to services and facilities through land use policies, (3) improve transportation infrastructure and services, and (4) help for-profit and nonprofit organizations organize informal groups to walk, bike, or carpool together. This thesis has important implications for policy makers and urban practitioners to meet the transportation needs of older adults. Improving transportation infrastructure and providing older adults with reliable and high-standard non-automobile transportation alternatives, managing future land use dynamics and investing in sustainable land use patterns, and coordinating with organizations to support social networks (such as informal clubs and local groups) that help older adults meet their travel needs are among some of these important implications

    'ํƒ‘์Šน์ž'์˜ ๊ด€์ ์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„, ์œ„์น˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ UI ๋””์ž์ธ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์ œ์•ˆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๋ฏธ์ˆ ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๋””์ž์ธํ•™๋ถ€ ๋””์ž์ธ์ „๊ณต,2019. 8. ์ •์˜์ฒ .One important design issue is the examination of how the user interface (UI) supports the new user role in future mobility. However, there are few design studies on the passengers cognitive needs and behavior in Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) based on empirical data. There is no doubt that autonomous mobility technologies are growing. The technology is already aiding the driving experience, and it will change the mobility culture and the transition of driver into passenger. This study is based on the premise that future AV is capable of performing all driving tasks. It proposes a set of passenger-centered automotive cluster UI designs for future mobility employing two factors: time and path. A set of empirical data is provided to understand the passengers perspective. In this study, a solid set of empirical data on the cognitive needs of passengers is collected. Human cognitive characteristics and driving tasks are investigated from various viewpoints to understand the passengers iii perspective. The cognitive relationship in the driving environment is analyzed through a literature review on situation awareness (SA) and structuring of the data flow framework. The framework is further explored by connecting the technological role transformation to the passenger. To construct the empirical database on the passenger, three sets of user tests and in-depth interviews were undertaken. The user tests were designed employing the Wizard of Oz method, and the results were summarized using descriptive and exploratory analysis. Based on these insights, a set of UI designs from the perspective of the passenger was proposed, and usability tests were conducted to verify its effectiveness and usability. The results of the tests demonstrate that a major percentage of the information request was related to time (current time and duration) and path (vehicle location and surroundings). Based on the data, a UI framework was built. Two usage scenarios were designed, time-full and time-less, for better in-situation comprehension. Time- and path-based UI were proposed to flow with the scenarios. A usability test was conducted, and a passengers cognitive framework was defined. There are two aspects to this study: the data flow frameworks of the driver/passenger, and the UI design proposal. Situational precision from the perspective of the driver was analyzed to understand the relationship between the user, the vehicle and the road conditions. Further, the cognitive framework of the passenger was proposed based on the data. This study provides a solid understanding of drivers emerging needs when they are relieved of the cognitive burden of driving tasks. The UI features for AV are introduced based on the empirical data and research related to the provision of better situation awareness, focusing on time and location. This study contributes to the extant literature by observing the iv perspective of passengers in Autonomous vehicles based on a qualitative study. The proposed UI design will be further explored as a communication method between the system and the passive user in future mobility.์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค๊ฐ€ (UI) ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์ด๋™์„ฑ์—์„œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์—ญํ• ์„ ์ง€์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋””์ž์ธ ๋„์ถœ์€ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์ด๋™์„ฑ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋””์ž์ธ ์ด์Šˆ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์‹คํ—˜์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ (AV) ์˜ ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์ธ์ง€ ์š•๊ตฌ์™€ ํ–‰๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋””์ž์ธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋ฏธํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „๊ณผ ๊ทธ ์˜์—ญ์€ ์ ์ฐจ ๋„“์–ด์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•ด๋‹น ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ์ด๋ฏธ ์šด์ „ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ์ ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์ด๋™๋ฌธํ™”์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์—ญํ• ์€ '์šด์ „์ž'์—์„œ 'ํƒ‘์Šน์ž'๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™”ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋ชจ๋“  ์šด์ „ ์ƒํ™ฉ์— ๋Œ€์ฒ˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์ „์ œ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์˜ ๊ด€์ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ๋ชจ๋นŒ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ์ ์šฉ๋  ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋””์ž์ธ์€ ์šด์ „์ž ์ค‘์‹ฌ์˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ์ธ์ง€์—์„œ ๋ฒ—์–ด๋‚˜ ํƒ‘์Šน์ž ์ค‘์‹ฌ ์ธ์ง€ ์ •๋ณด ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•œ UI ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์˜ ์ธ์ง€ ์ •๋ณด ์š”๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์˜ ๊ด€์ ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ธ์ง€์  ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์šด์ „ ํƒœ์Šคํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ƒํ™ฉ์ธ์ง€ (SA) ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์™€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์šด์ „ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ธ์ง€์  ์š”์†Œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์šด์ „์ž๊ฐ€ ํƒ‘์Šน์ž๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋˜์—ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ์šด์ „ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์‹œ๊ฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ฌ์ธต์ ์œผ๋กœ ํƒ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์˜ ์ธ์ง€ ๋‹ˆ์ฆˆ ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด 3 ์„ธํŠธ์˜ ์œ ์ € ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์™€ ์‹ฌ์ธต ์ธํ„ฐ๋ทฐ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๋ฐ˜๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ์ € ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” Wizard of Oz ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ค๊ณ„๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์งˆ์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์˜ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ถ„์„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–ป์€ ์ธ์‚ฌ์ดํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ํƒ‘์Šน์ž ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ UI ๋””์ž์ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ณ  ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ฑ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์œ ์šฉ์„ฑ์„ 5 ์  ๋ฆฌ ์ปคํŠธ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ๋กœ์จ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ํƒ‘์Šน์ž๊ฐ€ ์š”์ฒญํ•œ ์ธ์ง€ ์ •๋ณด๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„ (ํ˜„์žฌ ์‹œ๊ฐ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„)๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ (์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์œ„์น˜ ๋ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ)์— ์ง‘์ค‘๋œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ UI ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ƒํ™ฉ ์†์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ก€๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ๋„ ๊ฐ€์ง€ time-full ๊ณผ time-less ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ์œ„์น˜์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ UI ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ UI ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ฑ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ํƒ‘์Šน์ž ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ์˜ ์šด์ „์ƒํ™ฉ ์ธ์ง€ ์›Œํฌ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์„ ์™„์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ์ •๋ฆฌ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” ์šด์ „์ž / ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์˜ ๊ด€์ ์„ ์ง€์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” UI ๋””์ž์ธ ์ œ์•ˆ์— ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์šด์ „์ž์˜ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ์˜ ์šด์ „ ์ƒํ™ฉ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋„๋กœ ์ƒํƒœ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™”ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋Š” ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์ธ์ง€ ํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กฐ์ ์ธ ํ‹€๋กœ์จ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์šด์ „ ํƒœ์Šคํฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ์— ํ•„์š”ํ–ˆ๋˜ ์ธ์ง€ ๋ถ€๋‹ด์—์„œ ๋ฒ—์–ด๋‚ฌ์„ ๋•Œ์˜ ์šด์ „์ž๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ ์ธ ๋‹ˆ์ฆˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ๋ชจ๋นŒ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ UI ์˜ ๋””์ž์ธ ์š”์†Œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ–์ถ”์–ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ์‹คํ—˜์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ๋ฃจํŠธ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜์—ฌ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ์ƒํ™ฉ ์ธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ฌ๋„์žˆ๋Š” ๊ด€์ฐฐ์„ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์งˆ์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•œ ์ž์œจ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํƒ‘์Šน์ž ๊ด€์ ์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ด ๋””์ž์ธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ UI ๋””์ž์ธ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์ด๋™ ์„ฑ์•ˆ์—์„œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณผ ํƒ‘์Šน์ž ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆ์ผ€์ด์…˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋กœ์จ ๊ทธ ์˜์˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... II CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................... ๏ผ‘ 1.1. BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................................๏ผ‘ 1.2. PURPOSE .....................................................................................................................๏ผ— 1.3. RESEARCH QUESTION.....................................................................................................๏ผ˜ CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ..............................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ‘ 2.1. SITATION AWARENESS (SA) ........................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ‘ 2.2. HUMAN INFORMATION PROCESSING MODEL..................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ• 2.3. DRIVING SITUATION AWARENESS AND PERSPECTIVE.........................................................๏ผ’๏ผ 2.4. DRIVING TASK AND SENSORY INTERACTION ....................................................................๏ผ’๏ผ’ CHAPTER 3. COGNITIVE NEEDS IN AUTONOMOUS.....................................................๏ผ’๏ผ— 3.1. DRIVING BEHAVIOR TRANSFORMATION AND CLUSTER UI..................................................๏ผ’๏ผ— 3.2. COGNITIVE FRAMEWORK TRANSFORMATION ..................................................................๏ผ“๏ผ“ CHAPTER 4. USER TESTS ............................................................................................๏ผ“๏ผ– 4.1. WIZARD OF OZ PROTOTYPING .....................................................................................๏ผ“๏ผ˜ 4.2. PILOT TEST 1............................................................................................................๏ผ”๏ผ 4.2.1. Experiment Design & Laboratory Setting.................................................๏ผ”๏ผ 4.2.2. Persona Scenario & Task Design ..............................................................๏ผ”๏ผ’ 4.2.3. Preparation of Driving situation...............................................................๏ผ”๏ผ• 4.2.4. Procedure.................................................................................................๏ผ”๏ผ— 4.2.5. Data Analysis & Insight............................................................................๏ผ”๏ผ˜ 4.3. PILOT TEST 2............................................................................................................๏ผ•๏ผ‘ 4.3.1. Amendment: Experiment Design & Laboratory Setting ...........................๏ผ•๏ผ’ 4.3.2. Amendment: Task Scenario & Command Cue..........................................๏ผ•๏ผ” 4.3.3. Amendment: Perform Role and preparation of driving situation ............๏ผ•๏ผ— 4.3.4. Amendment: Procedure ...........................................................................๏ผ•๏ผ™ 4.3.5. Data Analysis & Insight............................................................................๏ผ–๏ผ’ 4.4. MAIN TEST ..............................................................................................................๏ผ–๏ผ• 4.4.1. Experiment Design & Laboratory setting .................................................๏ผ–๏ผ– 4.4.2. Task Design ..............................................................................................๏ผ–๏ผ™ 4.4.3. Procedure.................................................................................................๏ผ—๏ผ‘ 4.4.4. Result Analysis & Insight..........................................................................๏ผ—๏ผ” CHAPTER 5. UI CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT...................................................................๏ผ˜๏ผ‘ 5.1. UI DESIGN METHOD..................................................................................................๏ผ˜๏ผ‘ 5.2. DESIGN PROPOSAL ....................................................................................................๏ผ˜๏ผ” 5.3. USER SCENARIOS ......................................................................................................๏ผ˜๏ผ– 5.3.1 Scenario 1. Time-less: Late for a morning meeting..................................๏ผ˜๏ผ– 5.3.2 Scenario 2.Time-full: Leisure driving on weekends ..................................๏ผ™๏ผ“ CHAPTER 6. USABILITY TEST ......................................................................................๏ผ™๏ผ˜ 6.1. USABILITY TEST GUIDE ...............................................................................................๏ผ™๏ผ˜ 6.2. ASSESSMENT USABILITY TEST ..................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ 6.2.1 Test planning........................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ 6.2.2 Laboratory setting................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ’ 6.2.3 Test conduct and debriefing.................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ– 6.3. RESULT ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ– CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSION......................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ— APPENDIX 1...........................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ‘๏ผ APPENDIX 2...........................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ‘๏ผ‘ APPENDIX 3...........................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ‘๏ผ“ APPENDIX 4...........................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ’๏ผ‘ APPENDIX 5...........................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ’๏ผ” APPENDIX 6...........................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ’๏ผ˜ APPENDIX 7...........................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ“๏ผ“ BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ“๏ผ– ๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก ............................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ”๏ผ“Maste

    Mobility and Aging: Older Driversโ€™ Visual Searching, Lane Keeping and Coordination

    Get PDF
    This thesis examined older driversโ€™ mobility and behaviour through comprehensive measurements of driver-vehicle-environment interaction and investigated the associations between driving behaviour and cognitive functions. Data were collected and analysed for 50 older drivers using eye tracking, GNSS tracking, and GIS. Results showed that poor selective attention, spatial ability and executive function in older drivers adversely affect lane keeping, visual search and coordination. Visual-motor coordination measure is sensitive and effective for driving assessment in older drivers

    Poster Session: 2017 Community Engagement and Research Symposium

    Get PDF
    List of posters presented at the 6th annual Community Engagement and Research Symposium, held Friday, March 3, 2017, at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA. Some presenters agreed to make the full text of their posters available; these posters can be viewed in the symposium\u27s Poster Archive
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore