177 research outputs found
Axiomatizing proof tree concepts in Bounded Arithmetic
We construct theories of Cook-Nguyen style two-sort bounded arithmetic
whose provably total functions are exactly those in LOGCFL and LOGDCFL.
Axiomatizations of both theories are based on the proof tree size
characterizations of these classes. We also show that our theory for LOGCFL proves a certain formulation of the pumping lemma for context-free languages
Advances and applications of automata on words and trees : abstracts collection
From 12.12.2010 to 17.12.2010, the Dagstuhl Seminar 10501 "Advances and Applications of Automata on Words and Trees" was held in Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz Center for Informatics. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available
Completeness of a first-order temporal logic with time-gaps
The first-order temporal logics with □ and ○ of time structures isomorphic to ω (discrete linear time) and trees of ω-segments (linear time with branching gaps) and some of its fragments are compared: the first is not recursively axiomatizable. For the second, a cut-free complete sequent calculus is given, and from this, a resolution system is derived by the method of Maslov
Invariant Synthesis for Incomplete Verification Engines
We propose a framework for synthesizing inductive invariants for incomplete
verification engines, which soundly reduce logical problems in undecidable
theories to decidable theories. Our framework is based on the counter-example
guided inductive synthesis principle (CEGIS) and allows verification engines to
communicate non-provability information to guide invariant synthesis. We show
precisely how the verification engine can compute such non-provability
information and how to build effective learning algorithms when invariants are
expressed as Boolean combinations of a fixed set of predicates. Moreover, we
evaluate our framework in two verification settings, one in which verification
engines need to handle quantified formulas and one in which verification
engines have to reason about heap properties expressed in an expressive but
undecidable separation logic. Our experiments show that our invariant synthesis
framework based on non-provability information can both effectively synthesize
inductive invariants and adequately strengthen contracts across a large suite
of programs
Fixed-parameter tractability, definability, and model checking
In this article, we study parameterized complexity theory from the
perspective of logic, or more specifically, descriptive complexity theory.
We propose to consider parameterized model-checking problems for various
fragments of first-order logic as generic parameterized problems and show how
this approach can be useful in studying both fixed-parameter tractability and
intractability. For example, we establish the equivalence between the
model-checking for existential first-order logic, the homomorphism problem for
relational structures, and the substructure isomorphism problem. Our main
tractability result shows that model-checking for first-order formulas is
fixed-parameter tractable when restricted to a class of input structures with
an excluded minor. On the intractability side, for every t >= 0 we prove an
equivalence between model-checking for first-order formulas with t quantifier
alternations and the parameterized halting problem for alternating Turing
machines with t alternations. We discuss the close connection between this
alternation hierarchy and Downey and Fellows' W-hierarchy.
On a more abstract level, we consider two forms of definability, called Fagin
definability and slicewise definability, that are appropriate for describing
parameterized problems. We give a characterization of the class FPT of all
fixed-parameter tractable problems in terms of slicewise definability in finite
variable least fixed-point logic, which is reminiscent of the Immerman-Vardi
Theorem characterizing the class PTIME in terms of definability in least
fixed-point logic.Comment: To appear in SIAM Journal on Computin
Completeness for Flat Modal Fixpoint Logics
This paper exhibits a general and uniform method to prove completeness for
certain modal fixpoint logics. Given a set \Gamma of modal formulas of the form
\gamma(x, p1, . . ., pn), where x occurs only positively in \gamma, the
language L\sharp (\Gamma) is obtained by adding to the language of polymodal
logic a connective \sharp\_\gamma for each \gamma \epsilon. The term
\sharp\_\gamma (\varphi1, . . ., \varphin) is meant to be interpreted as the
least fixed point of the functional interpretation of the term \gamma(x,
\varphi 1, . . ., \varphi n). We consider the following problem: given \Gamma,
construct an axiom system which is sound and complete with respect to the
concrete interpretation of the language L\sharp (\Gamma) on Kripke frames. We
prove two results that solve this problem. First, let K\sharp (\Gamma) be the
logic obtained from the basic polymodal K by adding a Kozen-Park style fixpoint
axiom and a least fixpoint rule, for each fixpoint connective \sharp\_\gamma.
Provided that each indexing formula \gamma satisfies the syntactic criterion of
being untied in x, we prove this axiom system to be complete. Second,
addressing the general case, we prove the soundness and completeness of an
extension K+ (\Gamma) of K\_\sharp (\Gamma). This extension is obtained via an
effective procedure that, given an indexing formula \gamma as input, returns a
finite set of axioms and derivation rules for \sharp\_\gamma, of size bounded
by the length of \gamma. Thus the axiom system K+ (\Gamma) is finite whenever
\Gamma is finite
Ptarithmetic
The present article introduces ptarithmetic (short for "polynomial time
arithmetic") -- a formal number theory similar to the well known Peano
arithmetic, but based on the recently born computability logic (see
http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~giorgi/cl.html) instead of classical logic. The
formulas of ptarithmetic represent interactive computational problems rather
than just true/false statements, and their "truth" is understood as existence
of a polynomial time solution. The system of ptarithmetic elaborated in this
article is shown to be sound and complete. Sound in the sense that every
theorem T of the system represents an interactive number-theoretic
computational problem with a polynomial time solution and, furthermore, such a
solution can be effectively extracted from a proof of T. And complete in the
sense that every interactive number-theoretic problem with a polynomial time
solution is represented by some theorem T of the system.
The paper is self-contained, and can be read without any previous familiarity
with computability logic.Comment: Substantially better versions are on their way. Hence the present
article probably will not be publishe
- …