8,267 research outputs found
QR Factorization of Tall and Skinny Matrices in a Grid Computing Environment
Previous studies have reported that common dense linear algebra operations do
not achieve speed up by using multiple geographical sites of a computational
grid. Because such operations are the building blocks of most scientific
applications, conventional supercomputers are still strongly predominant in
high-performance computing and the use of grids for speeding up large-scale
scientific problems is limited to applications exhibiting parallelism at a
higher level. We have identified two performance bottlenecks in the distributed
memory algorithms implemented in ScaLAPACK, a state-of-the-art dense linear
algebra library. First, because ScaLAPACK assumes a homogeneous communication
network, the implementations of ScaLAPACK algorithms lack locality in their
communication pattern. Second, the number of messages sent in the ScaLAPACK
algorithms is significantly greater than other algorithms that trade flops for
communication. In this paper, we present a new approach for computing a QR
factorization -- one of the main dense linear algebra kernels -- of tall and
skinny matrices in a grid computing environment that overcomes these two
bottlenecks. Our contribution is to articulate a recently proposed algorithm
(Communication Avoiding QR) with a topology-aware middleware (QCG-OMPI) in
order to confine intensive communications (ScaLAPACK calls) within the
different geographical sites. An experimental study conducted on the Grid'5000
platform shows that the resulting performance increases linearly with the
number of geographical sites on large-scale problems (and is in particular
consistently higher than ScaLAPACK's).Comment: Accepted at IPDPS10. (IEEE International Parallel & Distributed
Processing Symposium 2010 in Atlanta, GA, USA.
Hybrid static/dynamic scheduling for already optimized dense matrix factorization
We present the use of a hybrid static/dynamic scheduling strategy of the task
dependency graph for direct methods used in dense numerical linear algebra.
This strategy provides a balance of data locality, load balance, and low
dequeue overhead. We show that the usage of this scheduling in communication
avoiding dense factorization leads to significant performance gains. On a 48
core AMD Opteron NUMA machine, our experiments show that we can achieve up to
64% improvement over a version of CALU that uses fully dynamic scheduling, and
up to 30% improvement over the version of CALU that uses fully static
scheduling. On a 16-core Intel Xeon machine, our hybrid static/dynamic
scheduling approach is up to 8% faster than the version of CALU that uses a
fully static scheduling or fully dynamic scheduling. Our algorithm leads to
speedups over the corresponding routines for computing LU factorization in well
known libraries. On the 48 core AMD NUMA machine, our best implementation is up
to 110% faster than MKL, while on the 16 core Intel Xeon machine, it is up to
82% faster than MKL. Our approach also shows significant speedups compared with
PLASMA on both of these systems
Recommended from our members
Preparing sparse solvers for exascale computing.
Sparse solvers provide essential functionality for a wide variety of scientific applications. Highly parallel sparse solvers are essential for continuing advances in high-fidelity, multi-physics and multi-scale simulations, especially as we target exascale platforms. This paper describes the challenges, strategies and progress of the US Department of Energy Exascale Computing project towards providing sparse solvers for exascale computing platforms. We address the demands of systems with thousands of high-performance node devices where exposing concurrency, hiding latency and creating alternative algorithms become essential. The efforts described here are works in progress, highlighting current success and upcoming challenges. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Numerical algorithms for high-performance computational science'
Minimizing Communication in Linear Algebra
In 1981 Hong and Kung proved a lower bound on the amount of communication
needed to perform dense, matrix-multiplication using the conventional
algorithm, where the input matrices were too large to fit in the small, fast
memory. In 2004 Irony, Toledo and Tiskin gave a new proof of this result and
extended it to the parallel case. In both cases the lower bound may be
expressed as (#arithmetic operations / ), where M is the size
of the fast memory (or local memory in the parallel case). Here we generalize
these results to a much wider variety of algorithms, including LU
factorization, Cholesky factorization, factorization, QR factorization,
algorithms for eigenvalues and singular values, i.e., essentially all direct
methods of linear algebra. The proof works for dense or sparse matrices, and
for sequential or parallel algorithms. In addition to lower bounds on the
amount of data moved (bandwidth) we get lower bounds on the number of messages
required to move it (latency). We illustrate how to extend our lower bound
technique to compositions of linear algebra operations (like computing powers
of a matrix), to decide whether it is enough to call a sequence of simpler
optimal algorithms (like matrix multiplication) to minimize communication, or
if we can do better. We give examples of both. We also show how to extend our
lower bounds to certain graph theoretic problems.
We point out recently designed algorithms for dense LU, Cholesky, QR,
eigenvalue and the SVD problems that attain these lower bounds; implementations
of LU and QR show large speedups over conventional linear algebra algorithms in
standard libraries like LAPACK and ScaLAPACK. Many open problems remain.Comment: 27 pages, 2 table
GHOST: Building blocks for high performance sparse linear algebra on heterogeneous systems
While many of the architectural details of future exascale-class high
performance computer systems are still a matter of intense research, there
appears to be a general consensus that they will be strongly heterogeneous,
featuring "standard" as well as "accelerated" resources. Today, such resources
are available as multicore processors, graphics processing units (GPUs), and
other accelerators such as the Intel Xeon Phi. Any software infrastructure that
claims usefulness for such environments must be able to meet their inherent
challenges: massive multi-level parallelism, topology, asynchronicity, and
abstraction. The "General, Hybrid, and Optimized Sparse Toolkit" (GHOST) is a
collection of building blocks that targets algorithms dealing with sparse
matrix representations on current and future large-scale systems. It implements
the "MPI+X" paradigm, has a pure C interface, and provides hybrid-parallel
numerical kernels, intelligent resource management, and truly heterogeneous
parallelism for multicore CPUs, Nvidia GPUs, and the Intel Xeon Phi. We
describe the details of its design with respect to the challenges posed by
modern heterogeneous supercomputers and recent algorithmic developments.
Implementation details which are indispensable for achieving high efficiency
are pointed out and their necessity is justified by performance measurements or
predictions based on performance models. The library code and several
applications are available as open source. We also provide instructions on how
to make use of GHOST in existing software packages, together with a case study
which demonstrates the applicability and performance of GHOST as a component
within a larger software stack.Comment: 32 pages, 11 figure
Graphs, Matrices, and the GraphBLAS: Seven Good Reasons
The analysis of graphs has become increasingly important to a wide range of
applications. Graph analysis presents a number of unique challenges in the
areas of (1) software complexity, (2) data complexity, (3) security, (4)
mathematical complexity, (5) theoretical analysis, (6) serial performance, and
(7) parallel performance. Implementing graph algorithms using matrix-based
approaches provides a number of promising solutions to these challenges. The
GraphBLAS standard (istc- bigdata.org/GraphBlas) is being developed to bring
the potential of matrix based graph algorithms to the broadest possible
audience. The GraphBLAS mathematically defines a core set of matrix-based graph
operations that can be used to implement a wide class of graph algorithms in a
wide range of programming environments. This paper provides an introduction to
the GraphBLAS and describes how the GraphBLAS can be used to address many of
the challenges associated with analysis of graphs.Comment: 10 pages; International Conference on Computational Science workshop
on the Applications of Matrix Computational Methods in the Analysis of Modern
Dat
Minimizing Communication for Eigenproblems and the Singular Value Decomposition
Algorithms have two costs: arithmetic and communication. The latter
represents the cost of moving data, either between levels of a memory
hierarchy, or between processors over a network. Communication often dominates
arithmetic and represents a rapidly increasing proportion of the total cost, so
we seek algorithms that minimize communication. In \cite{BDHS10} lower bounds
were presented on the amount of communication required for essentially all
-like algorithms for linear algebra, including eigenvalue problems and
the SVD. Conventional algorithms, including those currently implemented in
(Sca)LAPACK, perform asymptotically more communication than these lower bounds
require. In this paper we present parallel and sequential eigenvalue algorithms
(for pencils, nonsymmetric matrices, and symmetric matrices) and SVD algorithms
that do attain these lower bounds, and analyze their convergence and
communication costs.Comment: 43 pages, 11 figure
- …