31 research outputs found
Autoreducibility of NP-Complete Sets
We study the polynomial-time autoreducibility of NP-complete sets and obtain
separations under strong hypotheses for NP. Assuming there is a p-generic set
in NP, we show the following:
- For every , there is a -T-complete set for NP that is -T
autoreducible, but is not -tt autoreducible or -T autoreducible.
- For every , there is a -tt-complete set for NP that is -tt
autoreducible, but is not -tt autoreducible or -T autoreducible.
- There is a tt-complete set for NP that is tt-autoreducible, but is not
btt-autoreducible.
Under the stronger assumption that there is a p-generic set in NP
coNP, we show:
- For every , there is a -tt-complete set for NP that is -tt
autoreducible, but is not -T autoreducible.
Our proofs are based on constructions from separating NP-completeness
notions. For example, the construction of a 2-T-complete set for NP that is not
2-tt-complete also separates 2-T-autoreducibility from 2-tt-autoreducibility
Non-autoreducible Sets for NEXP
We investigate autoreducibility properties of complete sets for NEXP under different polynomial-time reductions. Specifically, we show that under some polynomial-time reductions there are complete sets for NEXP that are not autoreducible.
We show that settling the question whether every complete set for NEXP under non-adaptative reduction is autoreducible under NOR-truth-table reduction either positively or negatively would lead to major results about the exponential time complexity classes
Downward Self-Reducibility in TFNP
A problem is downward self-reducible if it can be solved efficiently given an oracle that returns solutions for strictly smaller instances. In the decisional landscape, downward self-reducibility is well studied and it is known that all downward self-reducible problems are in PSPACE. In this paper, we initiate the study of downward self-reducible search problems which are guaranteed to have a solution - that is, the downward self-reducible problems in TFNP. We show that most natural PLS-complete problems are downward self-reducible and any downward self-reducible problem in TFNP is contained in PLS. Furthermore, if the downward self-reducible problem is in TFUP (i.e. it has a unique solution), then it is actually contained in UEOPL, a subclass of CLS. This implies that if integer factoring is downward self-reducible then it is in fact in UEOPL, suggesting that no efficient factoring algorithm exists using the factorization of smaller numbers
Universal First-Order Logic is Superfluous for NL, P, NP and coNP
In this work we continue the syntactic study of completeness that began with
the works of Immerman and Medina. In particular, we take a conjecture raised by
Medina in his dissertation that says if a conjunction of a second-order and a
first-order sentences defines an NP-complete problems via fops, then it must be
the case that the second-order conjoint alone also defines a NP-complete
problem. Although this claim looks very plausible and intuitive, currently we
cannot provide a definite answer for it. However, we can solve in the
affirmative a weaker claim that says that all ``consistent'' universal
first-order sentences can be safely eliminated without the fear of losing
completeness. Our methods are quite general and can be applied to complexity
classes other than NP (in this paper: to NLSPACE, PTIME, and coNP), provided
the class has a complete problem satisfying a certain combinatorial property
07411 Abstracts Collection -- Algebraic Methods in Computational Complexity
From 07.10. to 12.10., the Dagstuhl Seminar 07411 ``Algebraic Methods in Computational Complexity\u27\u27 was held in the International Conference and Research Center (IBFI),
Schloss Dagstuhl.
During the seminar, several participants presented their current
research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of
the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of
seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section
describes the seminar topics and goals in general.
Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available
Nonuniform Reductions and NP-Completeness
Nonuniformity is a central concept in computational complexity with powerful connections to circuit complexity and randomness. Nonuniform reductions have been used to study the isomorphism conjecture for NP and completeness for larger complexity classes. We study the power of nonuniform reductions for NP0completeness, obtaining both separations and upper bounds for nonuniform completeness vs uniform complessness in NP.
Under various hypotheses, we obtain the following separations:
1. There is a set complete for NP under nonuniform many-one reductions, but not under uniform many-one reductions. This is true even with a single bit of nonuniform advice.
2. There is a set complete for NP under nonuniform many-one reductions with polynomial-size advice, but not under uniform Turing reductions. That is, polynomial nonuniformity is stronger than a polynomial number of queries.
3. For any fixed polynomial p(n), there is a set complete for NP under uniform 2-truth-table reductions, but not under nonuniform many-one reductions that use p(n) advice. That is, giving a uniform reduction a second query makes it more powerful than a nonuniform reduction with fixed polynomial advice.
4. There is a set complete for NP under nonuniform many-one reductions with polynomial ad- vice, but not under nonuniform many-one reductions with logarithmic advice. This hierarchy theorem also holds for other reducibilities, such as truth-table and Turing.
We also consider uniform upper bounds on nonuniform completeness. Hirahara (2015) showed that unconditionally every set that is complete for NP under nonuniform truth-table reductions that use logarithmic advice is also uniformly Turing-complete. We show that under a derandomization hypothesis, the same statement for truth-table reductions and truth-table completeness also holds