Embodied Evolution in Collective Robotics: A Review

This paper provides an overview of evolutionary robotics techniques applied to on-line distributed evolution for robot collectives -- namely, embodied evolution. It provides a definition of embodied evolution as well as a thorough description of the underlying concepts and mechanisms. The paper also presents a comprehensive summary of research published in the field since its inception (1999-2017), providing various perspectives to identify the major trends. In particular, we identify a shift from considering embodied evolution as a parallel search method within small robot collectives (fewer than 10 robots) to embodied evolution as an on-line distributed learning method for designing collective behaviours in swarm-like collectives. The paper concludes with a discussion of applications and open questions, providing a milestone for past and an inspiration for future research.Comment: 23 pages, 1 figure, 1 tabl

Collective Inspection of Regular Structures using a Swarm of Miniature Robots

We present a series of experiments concerned with the inspection of regular, engineered structures carried out using swarms of five to twenty autonomous, miniature robots, solely endowed with onboard, local sensors. Individual robot controllers are behaviorbased and the swarm coordination relies on a fully distributed control algorithm. The resulting collective behavior emerges from a combination of simple robot-robot interactions and the underlying environmental template. To estimate intrinsic advantages and limitations of the proposed control solution, we capture its characteristics at higher abstraction levels using nonspatial, microscopic and macroscopic probabilistic models. Although both types of models achieve only qualitatively correct predictions, they help us to shed light on the influence of the environmental template and control design choices on the considered nonspatial swarm metrics (inspection time and redundancy). Modeling results suggest that additional geometric details of the environmental structure should be taken into account for improving prediction accuracy and that the proposed control solution can be further optimized without changing its underlying architecture

Modeling and Analysis of Beaconless and Beacon-Based Policies for a Swarm-Intelligent Inspection System

We are developing a swarm-intelligent inspection system based on a swarm of autonomous, miniature robots, using only on-board, local sensors. To estimate intrinsic advantages and limitations of the proposed possible distributed control solution, we capture the dynamic of the system at a higher abstraction level using non-spatial probabilistic microscopic and macroscopic models. In a previous publication, we showed that we are able to predict quantitatively the performances of the swarm of robots for a given metric and a beaconless policy. In this paper, after briefly reviewing our modeling methodology, we explore the effect of adding an additional state to the individual robot controller, which allow robots to serve as a beacon for teammates and therefore bias their inspection routes. Results show that this additional complexity helps the swarm of robots to be more efficient in terms of energy consumption but not necessarily in terms of time required to complete the inspection. We also demonstrate that a beacon-based policy introduces a strong coupling among the behavior of robots, coupling which in turn results in nonlinearities at the macroscopic model level

Internet of robotic things : converging sensing/actuating, hypoconnectivity, artificial intelligence and IoT Platforms

The Internet of Things (IoT) concept is evolving rapidly and influencing newdevelopments in various application domains, such as the Internet of MobileThings (IoMT), Autonomous Internet of Things (A-IoT), Autonomous Systemof Things (ASoT), Internet of Autonomous Things (IoAT), Internetof Things Clouds (IoT-C) and the Internet of Robotic Things (IoRT) etc.that are progressing/advancing by using IoT technology. The IoT influencerepresents new development and deployment challenges in different areassuch as seamless platform integration, context based cognitive network integration,new mobile sensor/actuator network paradigms, things identification(addressing, naming in IoT) and dynamic things discoverability and manyothers. The IoRT represents new convergence challenges and their need to be addressed, in one side the programmability and the communication ofmultiple heterogeneous mobile/autonomous/robotic things for cooperating,their coordination, configuration, exchange of information, security, safetyand protection. Developments in IoT heterogeneous parallel processing/communication and dynamic systems based on parallelism and concurrencyrequire new ideas for integrating the intelligent “devices”, collaborativerobots (COBOTS), into IoT applications. Dynamic maintainability, selfhealing,self-repair of resources, changing resource state, (re-) configurationand context based IoT systems for service implementation and integrationwith IoT network service composition are of paramount importance whennew “cognitive devices” are becoming active participants in IoT applications.This chapter aims to be an overview of the IoRT concept, technologies,architectures and applications and to provide a comprehensive coverage offuture challenges, developments and applications

Distributed Colony-Level Algorithm Switching for Robot Swarm Foraging

Swarm robotics utilizes a large number of simple robots to accomplish a task, instead of a single complex robot. Communications constraints often force these systems to be distributed and leaderless, placing restrictions on the types of algorithms which can be executed by the swarm. The performance of a swarm algorithm is affected by the environment in which the swarm operates. Different environments may call for different algorithms to be chosen, but often no single robot has enough information to make this decision. In this paper, we focus on foraging as a multi-robot task and present two distributed foraging algorithms, each of which performs best for different food locations. We then present a third adaptive algorithm in which the swarm as a whole is able to choose the best algorithm for the given situation by combining individual-level and distributed colony-level algorithm switching. We show that this adaptive method combines the bene ts of the other methods, and yields the best overall performance.Engineering and Applied Science