3 research outputs found

    Autonomous CMOS Power Management Integrated Circuit for Electrostatic Kinetic Energy Harvesters e-KEH

    No full text
    International audienceIn this paper we present an autonomous Power Management Integrated Circuit PMIC for an electret-biased electrostatic kinetic energy harvester with a Bennet's doubler conditioning circuit. The circuit is designed in high voltage 0.35 μm standard bulk CMOS technology. It supplies a low voltage load from the energy extracted from a high voltage transducer. The circuit is provided with a "cold start" mechanism and with a "safe mode" (Recovery) feature that permits to the system to stay active (awake) for a longer time after external vibrations stop temporarily. An ultra-low static power hysteresis comparator is designed for a specific control of the capacitive transducer's conditioning circuit. The autonomy of the system is ensured by a voltage regulator that supplies the internal blocks of the circuit with 1.1 V. The proposed design consumes less than 400 nW making it adequate for use with existing state-of-the art capacitive harvesting MEMS devices

    Performance Analysis For Wireless G (IEEE 802.11 G) And Wireless N (IEEE 802.11 N) In Outdoor Environment

    Get PDF
    This paper described an analysis the different capabilities and limitation of both IEEE technologies that has been utilized for data transmission directed to mobile device. In this work, we have compared an IEEE 802.11/g/n outdoor environment to know what technology is better. the comparison consider on coverage area (mobility), through put and measuring the interferences. The work presented here is to help the researchers to select the best technology depending of their deploying case, and investigate the best variant for outdoor. The tool used is Iperf software which is to measure the data transmission performance of IEEE 802.11n and IEEE 802.11g

    Performance analysis for wireless G (IEEE 802.11G) and wireless N (IEEE 802.11N) in outdoor environment

    Get PDF
    This paper described an analysis the different capabilities and limitation of both IEEE technologies that has been utilized for data transmission directed to mobile device. In this work, we have compared an IEEE 802.11/g/n outdoor environment to know what technology is better. The comparison consider on coverage area (mobility), throughput and measuring the interferences. The work presented here is to help the researchers to select the best technology depending of their deploying case, and investigate the best variant for outdoor. The tool used is Iperf software which is to measure the data transmission performance of IEEE 802.11n and IEEE 802.11g
    corecore