62,616 research outputs found
The Neurocognitive Process of Digital Radicalization: A Theoretical Model and Analytical Framework
Recent studies suggest that empathy induced by narrative messages can effectively facilitate persuasion and reduce psychological reactance. Although limited, emerging research on the etiology of radical political behavior has begun to explore the role of narratives in shaping an individual’s beliefs, attitudes, and intentions that culminate in radicalization. The existing studies focus exclusively on the influence of narrative persuasion on an individual, but they overlook the necessity of empathy and that in the absence of empathy, persuasion is not salient. We argue that terrorist organizations are strategic in cultivating empathetic-persuasive messages using audiovisual materials, and disseminating their message within the digital medium. Therefore, in this paper we propose a theoretical model and analytical framework capable of helping us better understand the neurocognitive process of digital radicalization
Minding the Gap: Bias, Soft Structures, and the Double Life of Social Norms
We argue that work on norms provides a way to move beyond debates between proponents of individualist and structuralist approaches to bias, oppression, and injustice. We briefly map out the geography of that debate before presenting Charlotte Witt’s view, showing how her position, and the normative ascriptivism at its heart, seamlessly connects individuals to the social reality they inhabit. We then describe recent empirical work on the psychology of norms and locate the notions of informal institutions and soft structures with respect to it. Finally, we argue that the empirical resources enrich Witt’s ascriptivism, and that the resulting picture shows theorists need not, indeed should not, choose between either the individualist or structuralist camp
Mobilizing the Trump Train: Understanding Collective Action in a Political Trolling Community
Political trolls initiate online discord not only for the lulz (laughs) but
also for ideological reasons, such as promoting their desired political
candidates. Political troll groups recently gained spotlight because they were
considered central in helping Donald Trump win the 2016 US presidential
election, which involved difficult mass mobilizations. Political trolls face
unique challenges as they must build their own communities while simultaneously
disrupting others. However, little is known about how political trolls mobilize
sufficient participation to suddenly become problems for others. We performed a
quantitative longitudinal analysis of more than 16 million comments from one of
the most popular and disruptive political trolling communities, the subreddit
/r/The\_Donald (T\D). We use T_D as a lens to understand participation and
collective action within these deviant spaces. In specific, we first study the
characteristics of the most active participants to uncover what might drive
their sustained participation. Next, we investigate how these active
individuals mobilize their community to action. Through our analysis, we
uncover that the most active employed distinct discursive strategies to
mobilize participation, and deployed technical tools like bots to create a
shared identity and sustain engagement. We conclude by providing data-backed
design implications for designers of civic media
Social norms and human normative psychology
Our primary aim in this paper is to sketch a cognitive evolutionary approach for developing explanations of social change that is anchored on the psychological mechanisms underlying normative cognition and the transmission of social norms. We throw the relevant features of this approach into relief by comparing it with the self-fulfilling social expectations account developed by Bicchieri and colleagues. After describing both accounts, we argue that the two approaches are largely compatible, but that the cognitive evolutionary approach is well- suited to encompass much of the social expectations view, whose focus on a narrow range of norms comes at the expense of the breadth the cognitive evolutionary approach can provide
Pushing Your Point of View: Behavioral Measures of Manipulation in Wikipedia
As a major source for information on virtually any topic, Wikipedia serves an
important role in public dissemination and consumption of knowledge. As a
result, it presents tremendous potential for people to promulgate their own
points of view; such efforts may be more subtle than typical vandalism. In this
paper, we introduce new behavioral metrics to quantify the level of controversy
associated with a particular user: a Controversy Score (C-Score) based on the
amount of attention the user focuses on controversial pages, and a Clustered
Controversy Score (CC-Score) that also takes into account topical clustering.
We show that both these measures are useful for identifying people who try to
"push" their points of view, by showing that they are good predictors of which
editors get blocked. The metrics can be used to triage potential POV pushers.
We apply this idea to a dataset of users who requested promotion to
administrator status and easily identify some editors who significantly changed
their behavior upon becoming administrators. At the same time, such behavior is
not rampant. Those who are promoted to administrator status tend to have more
stable behavior than comparable groups of prolific editors. This suggests that
the Adminship process works well, and that the Wikipedia community is not
overwhelmed by users who become administrators to promote their own points of
view
On the Role of Social Identity and Cohesion in Characterizing Online Social Communities
Two prevailing theories for explaining social group or community structure
are cohesion and identity. The social cohesion approach posits that social
groups arise out of an aggregation of individuals that have mutual
interpersonal attraction as they share common characteristics. These
characteristics can range from common interests to kinship ties and from social
values to ethnic backgrounds. In contrast, the social identity approach posits
that an individual is likely to join a group based on an intrinsic
self-evaluation at a cognitive or perceptual level. In other words group
members typically share an awareness of a common category membership.
In this work we seek to understand the role of these two contrasting theories
in explaining the behavior and stability of social communities in Twitter. A
specific focal point of our work is to understand the role of these theories in
disparate contexts ranging from disaster response to socio-political activism.
We extract social identity and social cohesion features-of-interest for large
scale datasets of five real-world events and examine the effectiveness of such
features in capturing behavioral characteristics and the stability of groups.
We also propose a novel measure of social group sustainability based on the
divergence in group discussion. Our main findings are: 1) Sharing of social
identities (especially physical location) among group members has a positive
impact on group sustainability, 2) Structural cohesion (represented by high
group density and low average shortest path length) is a strong indicator of
group sustainability, and 3) Event characteristics play a role in shaping group
sustainability, as social groups in transient events behave differently from
groups in events that last longer
- …