Artifact Removal Methods in EEG Recordings: A Review

To obtain the correct analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals, non-physiological and physiological artifacts should be removed from EEG signals. This study aims to give an overview on the existing methodology for removing physiological artifacts, e.g., ocular, cardiac, and muscle artifacts. The datasets, simulation platforms, and performance measures of artifact removal methods in previous related research are summarized. The advantages and disadvantages of each technique are discussed, including regression method, filtering method, blind source separation (BSS), wavelet transform (WT), empirical mode decomposition (EMD), singular spectrum analysis (SSA), and independent vector analysis (IVA). Also, the applications of hybrid approaches are presented, including discrete wavelet transform - adaptive filtering method (DWT-AFM), DWT-BSS, EMD-BSS, singular spectrum analysis - adaptive noise canceler (SSA-ANC), SSA-BSS, and EMD-IVA. Finally, a comparative analysis for these existing methods is provided based on their performance and merits. The result shows that hybrid methods can remove the artifacts more effectively than individual methods

A real-time noise cancelling EEG electrode employing Deep Learning

Two major problems of head worn electroencephalogram (EEG) are muscle and eye-blink artefacts, in particular in non-clinical environments while performing everyday tasks. Current artefact removal techniques such as principle component analysis (PCA) or independent component analysis (ICA) take signals from a high number of electrodes and separate the noise from the signal by processing them offline in a computationally expensive and slow way. In contrast, we present a smart compound electrode which is able to learn in real-time to remove artefacts. The smart 3D printed electrode consists of a central electrode and a ring electrode where poly-lactate acid (PLA) was used for the the base and Ag/AgCl for the conductive parts allowing standard manufacturing processes. A new deep learning algorithm then learns continuously to remove both eye-blink and muscle artefacts which combines the real-time capabilities of adaptive filters with the power of deep neural networks. The electrode setup together with the deep learning algorithm increases the signal to noise ratio of the EEG in average by 20 dB. Our approach offers a simple 3D printed design in combination with a real-time algorithm which can be integrated into the electrode itself. This electrode has the potential to provide high quality EEG in non-clinical and consumer applications, such as sleep monitoring and brain-computer interface (BCI).Comment: 12 pages, 4 figures, code available under http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.413110

Optimised use of independent component analysis for EEG signal processing

Electroencephalography (EEG) is the prevalent technique for monitoring brain function. It employs a set of electrodes on the scalp to measure the electrical activity of the brain. EEG is mainly used by researchers to study the brain’s responses to a specific stimulus - the event-related potentials (ERPs). Different types of unwanted signals, which are known as artefacts, usually mix with the EEG at any point during the recording process. As the amplitudes of the EEG and ERPs are very small (in the order of microvolts), they can be buried in the artefacts which have very high amplitudes in the order of millivolts. Therefore, contamination of EEG activity by the artefacts can degrade the quality of the EEG recording and may cause error in EEG/ERP signal interpretation. Several EEG artefact removal methods already exist in the literature and these previous studies have concentrated on manual or automatic detection of either one or, of a few types of EEG artefacts. Among the proposed methods, Independent Component Analysis (ICA) based techniques are commonly applied to successfully detect the artefacts. Different types of ICA algorithms have been developed, which aim to estimate the individual sources of a linearly mixed signal. However, the estimation criterion differs across various ICA algorithms, which may deliver different results