2,187 research outputs found
Prosody-Based Automatic Segmentation of Speech into Sentences and Topics
A crucial step in processing speech audio data for information extraction,
topic detection, or browsing/playback is to segment the input into sentence and
topic units. Speech segmentation is challenging, since the cues typically
present for segmenting text (headers, paragraphs, punctuation) are absent in
spoken language. We investigate the use of prosody (information gleaned from
the timing and melody of speech) for these tasks. Using decision tree and
hidden Markov modeling techniques, we combine prosodic cues with word-based
approaches, and evaluate performance on two speech corpora, Broadcast News and
Switchboard. Results show that the prosodic model alone performs on par with,
or better than, word-based statistical language models -- for both true and
automatically recognized words in news speech. The prosodic model achieves
comparable performance with significantly less training data, and requires no
hand-labeling of prosodic events. Across tasks and corpora, we obtain a
significant improvement over word-only models using a probabilistic combination
of prosodic and lexical information. Inspection reveals that the prosodic
models capture language-independent boundary indicators described in the
literature. Finally, cue usage is task and corpus dependent. For example, pause
and pitch features are highly informative for segmenting news speech, whereas
pause, duration and word-based cues dominate for natural conversation.Comment: 30 pages, 9 figures. To appear in Speech Communication 32(1-2),
Special Issue on Accessing Information in Spoken Audio, September 200
Estimating Performance of Pipelined Spoken Language Translation Systems
Most spoken language translation systems developed to date rely on a
pipelined architecture, in which the main stages are speech recognition,
linguistic analysis, transfer, generation and speech synthesis. When making
projections of error rates for systems of this kind, it is natural to assume
that the error rates for the individual components are independent, making the
system accuracy the product of the component accuracies.
The paper reports experiments carried out using the SRI-SICS-Telia Research
Spoken Language Translator and a 1000-utterance sample of unseen data. The
results suggest that the naive performance model leads to serious overestimates
of system error rates, since there are in fact strong dependencies between the
components. Predicting the system error rate on the independence assumption by
simple multiplication resulted in a 16\% proportional overestimate for all
utterances, and a 19\% overestimate when only utterances of length 1-10 words
were considered.Comment: 10 pages, Latex source. To appear in Proc. ICSLP '9
Analyzing Input and Output Representations for Speech-Driven Gesture Generation
This paper presents a novel framework for automatic speech-driven gesture
generation, applicable to human-agent interaction including both virtual agents
and robots. Specifically, we extend recent deep-learning-based, data-driven
methods for speech-driven gesture generation by incorporating representation
learning. Our model takes speech as input and produces gestures as output, in
the form of a sequence of 3D coordinates. Our approach consists of two steps.
First, we learn a lower-dimensional representation of human motion using a
denoising autoencoder neural network, consisting of a motion encoder MotionE
and a motion decoder MotionD. The learned representation preserves the most
important aspects of the human pose variation while removing less relevant
variation. Second, we train a novel encoder network SpeechE to map from speech
to a corresponding motion representation with reduced dimensionality. At test
time, the speech encoder and the motion decoder networks are combined: SpeechE
predicts motion representations based on a given speech signal and MotionD then
decodes these representations to produce motion sequences. We evaluate
different representation sizes in order to find the most effective
dimensionality for the representation. We also evaluate the effects of using
different speech features as input to the model. We find that mel-frequency
cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), alone or combined with prosodic features,
perform the best. The results of a subsequent user study confirm the benefits
of the representation learning.Comment: Accepted at IVA '19. Shorter version published at AAMAS '19. The code
is available at
https://github.com/GestureGeneration/Speech_driven_gesture_generation_with_autoencode
Recognizing prosody from the lips: is it possible to extract prosodic focus from lip features?
International audienceThe aim of this chapter is to examine the possibility of extracting prosodic information from lip features. We used two measurement techniques enabling automatic lip feature extraction to evaluate the "lip pattern" of prosodic focus in French. Two corpora with Subject-Verb-Object (SVO) sentences were designed. Four focus conditions (S, V, O or neutral) were elicited in a natural dialogue situation. In a first set of experiments, we recorded two speakers of French with front and profile video cameras. The speakers wore blue make-up and facial markers. In a second set we recorded five speakers with a 3D optical tracker. An analysis of the lip features showed that visible articulatory lip correlates of focus exist for all speakers. Two types of patterns were observed: absolute and differential. A potential outcome of this study is to provide criteria for automatic visual detection of prosodic focus from lip data
The listening talker: A review of human and algorithmic context-induced modifications of speech
International audienceSpeech output technology is finding widespread application, including in scenarios where intelligibility might be compromised - at least for some listeners - by adverse conditions. Unlike most current algorithms, talkers continually adapt their speech patterns as a response to the immediate context of spoken communication, where the type of interlocutor and the environment are the dominant situational factors influencing speech production. Observations of talker behaviour can motivate the design of more robust speech output algorithms. Starting with a listener-oriented categorisation of possible goals for speech modification, this review article summarises the extensive set of behavioural findings related to human speech modification, identifies which factors appear to be beneficial, and goes on to examine previous computational attempts to improve intelligibility in noise. The review concludes by tabulating 46 speech modifications, many of which have yet to be perceptually or algorithmically evaluated. Consequently, the review provides a roadmap for future work in improving the robustness of speech output
Concurrent affective and linguistic prosody with the same emotional valence elicits a late positive ERP response
Change in linguistic prosody generates a mismatch negativity response (MMN), indicating neural representation of linguistic prosody, while change in affective prosody generates a positive response (P3a), reflecting its motivational salience. However, the neural response to concurrent affective and linguistic prosody is unknown. The present paper investigates the integration of these two prosodic features in the brain by examining the neural response to separate and concurrent processing by electroencephalography (EEG). A spoken pair of Swedish words—[ˈfɑ́ːsɛn] phase and [ˈfɑ̀ːsɛn] damn—that differed in emotional semantics due to linguistic prosody was presented to 16 subjects in an angry and neutral affective prosody using a passive auditory oddball paradigm. Acoustically matched pseudowords—[ˈvɑ́ːsɛm] and [ˈvɑ̀ːsɛm]—were used as controls. Following the constructionist concept of emotions, accentuating the conceptualization of emotions based on language, it was hypothesized that concurrent affective and linguistic prosody with the same valence—angry [ˈfɑ̀ːsɛn] damn—would elicit a unique late EEG signature, reflecting the temporal integration of affective voice with emotional semantics of prosodic origin. In accordance, linguistic prosody elicited an MMN at 300–350 ms, and affective prosody evoked a P3a at 350–400 ms, irrespective of semantics. Beyond these responses, concurrent affective and linguistic prosody evoked a late positive component (LPC) at 820–870 ms in frontal areas, indicating the conceptualization of affective prosody based on linguistic prosody. This study provides evidence that the brain does not only distinguish between these two functions of prosody but also integrates them based on language and experience
- …