Enhancing Information Retrieval Relevance Using Touch Dynamics on Search Engine

Using Touch Dynamics on Search Engine is an attempt to establish the possibilities of using user touch behavior which is monitored and several unique features are extracted. The unique features are used for identifying users and their traits according to the touch dynamics. The results can be used for defining automatic user unique searching behavior. Touch dynamics has been discussed in several studies in the context of user authentication and biometric identification for security purposes. This study establishes the possibility of integrating touch dynamics results for identifying user searching preferences and interests. This study investigates a technique of combining personalized search with touch dynamics results information as an approach for determining user preferences, interest measurement and context. Keywords: Personalized Search, Information Retrieval, Touch Dynamics, Search Engin

Automated user modeling for personalized digital libraries

Digital libraries (DL) have become one of the most typical ways of accessing any kind of digitalized information. Due to this key role, users welcome any improvements on the services they receive from digital libraries. One trend used to improve digital services is through personalization. Up to now, the most common approach for personalization in digital libraries has been user-driven. Nevertheless, the design of efficient personalized services has to be done, at least in part, in an automatic way. In this context, machine learning techniques automate the process of constructing user models. This paper proposes a new approach to construct digital libraries that satisfy user’s necessity for information: Adaptive Digital Libraries, libraries that automatically learn user preferences and goals and personalize their interaction using this information

개인화 검색 및 파트너쉽 선정을 위한 사용자 프로파일링

학위논문 (박사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 치의과학과, 2014. 2. 김홍기.The secret of change is to focus all of your energy not on fighting the old, but on building the new. - Socrates The automatic identification of user intention is an important but highly challenging research problem whose solution can greatly benefit information systems. In this thesis, I look at the problem of identifying sources of user interests, extracting latent semantics from it, and modelling it as a user profile. I present algorithms that automatically infer user interests and extract hidden semantics from it, specifically aimed at improving personalized search. I also present a methodology to model user profile as a buyer profile or a seller profile, where the attributes of the profile are populated from a controlled vocabulary. The buyer profiles and seller profiles are used in partnership match. In the domain of personalized search, first, a novel method to construct a profile of user interests is proposed which is based on mining anchor text. Second, two methods are proposed to builder a user profile that gather terms from a folksonomy system where matrix factorization technique is explored to discover hidden relationship between them. The objective of the methods is to discover latent relationship between terms such that contextually, semantically, and syntactically related terms could be grouped together, thus disambiguating the context of term usage. The profile of user interests is also analysed to judge its clustering tendency and clustering accuracy. Extensive evaluation indicates that a profile of user interests, that can correctly or precisely disambiguate the context of user query, has a significant impact on the personalized search quality. In the domain of partnership match, an ontology termed as partnership ontology is proposed. The attributes or concepts, in the partnership ontology, are features representing context of work. It is used by users to lay down their requirements as buyer profiles or seller profiles. A semantic similarity measure is defined to compute a ranked list of matching seller profiles for a given buyer profile.1 Introduction 1 1.1 User Profiling for Personalized Search . . . . . . . . 9 1.1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 1.1.2 Research Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1.2 User Profiling for Partnership Match . . . . . . . . 18 1.2.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 1.2.2 Research Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 1.3 Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 1.4 System Architecture - Personalized Search . . . . . 29 1.5 System Architecture - Partnership Match . . . . . . 31 1.6 Organization of this Dissertation . . . . . . . . . . 32 2 Background 35 2.1 Introduction to Social Web . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 2.2 Matrix Decomposition Methods . . . . . . . . . . . 40 2.3 User Interest Profile For Personalized Web Search Non Folksonomy based . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 2.4 User Interest Profile for Personalized Web Search Folksonomy based . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 2.5 Personalized Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 2.6 Partnership Match . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3 Mining anchor text for building User Interest Profile: A non-folksonomy based personalized search 56 3.1 Exclusively Yours' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 3.1.1 Infer User Interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 3.1.2 Weight Computation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 3.1.3 Query Expansion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 3.2 Exclusively Yours' Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 3.3 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 3.3.1 DataSet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 3.3.2 Evaluation Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 3.3.3 User Profile Efficacy . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 3.3.4 Personalized vs. Non-Personalized Results . 76 3.4 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4 Matrix factorization for building Clustered User Interest Profile: A folksonomy based personalized search 82 4.1 Aggregating tags from user search history . . . . . 86 4.2 Latent Semantics in UIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 4.2.1 Computing the tag-tag Similarity matrix . . 90 4.2.2 Tag Clustering to generate svdCUIP and modSvdCUIP 98 4.3 Personalized Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 4.4 Experimental Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 4.4.1 Data Set and Experiment Methodology . . . 103 4.4.1.1 Custom Data Set and Evaluation Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 4.4.1.2 AOL Query Data Set and Evaluation Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 4.4.1.3 Experiment set up to estimate the value of k and d . . . . . . . . . . 107 4.4.1.4 Experiment set up to compare the proposed approaches with other approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 4.4.2 Experiment Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 4.4.2.1 Clustering Tendency . . . . . . . . 111 4.4.2.2 Determining the value for dimension parameter, k, for the Custom Data Set . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 4.4.2.3 Determining the value of distinctness parameter, d, for the Custom data set . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 4.4.2.4 CUIP visualization . . . . . . . . . 117 4.4.2.5 Determining the value of the dimension reduction parameter k for the AOL data set. . . . . . . . . . . . 119 4.4.2.6 Determining the value of distinctness parameter, d, for the AOL data set . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 4.4.2.7 Time to generate svdCUIP and modSvd-CUIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 4.4.2.8 Comparison of the svdCUIP, modSvd-CUIP, and tfIdfCUIP for different classes of queries . . . . . . . . . . 123 4.4.2.9 Comparing all five methods - Improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 4.4.3 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 5 User Profiling for Partnership Match 133 5.1 Supplier Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 5.2 Criteria for Partnership Establishment . . . . . . . 140 5.3 Partnership Ontology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 5.4 Case Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 5.4.1 Buyer Profile and Seller Profile . . . . . . . 153 5.4.2 Semantic Similarity Measure . . . . . . . . . 155 5.5 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 5.6 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 6 Conclusion 164 6.1 Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 6.1.1 Degree of Personalization . . . . . . . . . . . 167 6.1.2 Filter Bubble . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 6.1.3 IPR issues in Partnership Match . . . . . . . 169 Bibliography 170 Appendices 193 .1 Pairs of Query and target URL . . . . . . . . . . . 194 .2 Examples of Expanded Queries . . . . . . . . . . . 197 .3 An example of svdCUIP, modSvdCUIP, tfIdfCUIP 198Docto

CHORUS Deliverable 2.2: Second report - identification of multi-disciplinary key issues for gap analysis toward EU multimedia search engines roadmap

After addressing the state-of-the-art during the first year of Chorus and establishing the existing landscape in multimedia search engines, we have identified and analyzed gaps within European research effort during our second year. In this period we focused on three directions, notably technological issues, user-centred issues and use-cases and socio- economic and legal aspects. These were assessed by two central studies: firstly, a concerted vision of functional breakdown of generic multimedia search engine, and secondly, a representative use-cases descriptions with the related discussion on requirement for technological challenges. Both studies have been carried out in cooperation and consultation with the community at large through EC concertation meetings (multimedia search engines cluster), several meetings with our Think-Tank, presentations in international conferences, and surveys addressed to EU projects coordinators as well as National initiatives coordinators. Based on the obtained feedback we identified two types of gaps, namely core technological gaps that involve research challenges, and “enablers”, which are not necessarily technical research challenges, but have impact on innovation progress. New socio-economic trends are presented as well as emerging legal challenges

Online advertising: analysis of privacy threats and protection approaches

Online advertising, the pillar of the “free” content on the Web, has revolutionized the marketing business in recent years by creating a myriad of new opportunities for advertisers to reach potential customers. The current advertising model builds upon an intricate infrastructure composed of a variety of intermediary entities and technologies whose main aim is to deliver personalized ads. For this purpose, a wealth of user data is collected, aggregated, processed and traded behind the scenes at an unprecedented rate. Despite the enormous value of online advertising, however, the intrusiveness and ubiquity of these practices prompt serious privacy concerns. This article surveys the online advertising infrastructure and its supporting technologies, and presents a thorough overview of the underlying privacy risks and the solutions that may mitigate them. We first analyze the threats and potential privacy attackers in this scenario of online advertising. In particular, we examine the main components of the advertising infrastructure in terms of tracking capabilities, data collection, aggregation level and privacy risk, and overview the tracking and data-sharing technologies employed by these components. Then, we conduct a comprehensive survey of the most relevant privacy mechanisms, and classify and compare them on the basis of their privacy guarantees and impact on the Web.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Exploiting the user interaction context for automatic task detection

Detecting the task a user is performing on her computer desktop is important for providing her with contextualized and personalized support. Some recent approaches propose to perform automatic user task detection by means of classifiers using captured user context data. In this paper we improve on that by using an ontology-based user interaction context model that can be automatically populated by (i) capturing simple user interaction events on the computer desktop and (ii) applying rule-based and information extraction mechanisms. We present evaluation results from a large user study we have carried out in a knowledge-intensive business environment, showing that our ontology-based approach provides new contextual features yielding good task detection performance. We also argue that good results can be achieved by training task classifiers `online' on user context data gathered in laboratory settings. Finally, we isolate a combination of contextual features that present a significantly better discriminative power than classical ones