Bilingualism and the single route/dual route debate

The debate between single and dual route accounts of cognitive processes has been generated predominantly by the application of connectionist modeling techniques to two areas of psycholinguistics. This paper draws an analogy between this debate and bilingual language processing. A prominent question within bilingual word recognition is whether the bilingual has functionally separate lexicons for each language, or a single system able to recognize the words in both languages. Empirical evidence has been taken to support a model which includes two separate lexicons working in parallel (Smith, 1991; Gerard and Scarborough, 1989). However, a range of interference effects has been found between the bilingual’s two sets of lexical knowledge (Thomas, 1997a). Connectionist models have been put forward which suggest that a single representational resource may deal with these data, so long as words are coded according to language membership (Thomas, 1997a, 1997b, Dijkstra and van Heuven, 1998). This paper discusses the criteria which might be used to differentiate single route and dual route models. An empirical study is introduced to address one of these criteria, parallel access, with regard to bilingual word recognition. The study fails to find support for the dual route model

Introduction to the special issue on cross-language algorithms and applications

With the increasingly global nature of our everyday interactions, the need for multilingual technologies to support efficient and efective information access and communication cannot be overemphasized. Computational modeling of language has been the focus of Natural Language Processing, a subdiscipline of Artificial Intelligence. One of the current challenges for this discipline is to design methodologies and algorithms that are cross-language in order to create multilingual technologies rapidly. The goal of this JAIR special issue on Cross-Language Algorithms and Applications (CLAA) is to present leading research in this area, with emphasis on developing unifying themes that could lead to the development of the science of multi- and cross-lingualism. In this introduction, we provide the reader with the motivation for this special issue and summarize the contributions of the papers that have been included. The selected papers cover a broad range of cross-lingual technologies including machine translation, domain and language adaptation for sentiment analysis, cross-language lexical resources, dependency parsing, information retrieval and knowledge representation. We anticipate that this special issue will serve as an invaluable resource for researchers interested in topics of cross-lingual natural language processing.Postprint (published version

Self-supervised end-to-end ASR for low resource L2 Swedish

Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2021 ISCA.Unlike traditional (hybrid) Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), end-to-end ASR systems simplify the training procedure by directly mapping acoustic features to sequences of graphemes or characters, thereby eliminating the need for specialized acoustic, language, or pronunciation models. However, one drawback of end-to-end ASR systems is that they require more training data than conventional ASR systems to achieve similar word error rate (WER). This makes it difficult to develop ASR systems for tasks where transcribed target data is limited such as developing ASR for Second Language (L2) speakers of Swedish. Nonetheless, recent advancements in selfsupervised acoustic learning, manifested in wav2vec models [1, 2, 3], leverage the available untranscribed speech data to provide compact acoustic representation that can achieve low WER when incorporated in end-to-end systems. To this end, we experiment with several monolingual and cross-lingual selfsupervised acoustic models to develop end-to-end ASR system for L2 Swedish. Even though our test is very small, it indicates that these systems are competitive in performance with traditional ASR pipeline. Our best model seems to reduce the WER by 7% relative to our traditional ASR baseline trained on the same target data.Peer reviewe

Automatic Speech Recognition without Transcribed Speech or Pronunciation Lexicons

Rapid deployment of automatic speech recognition (ASR) in new languages, with very limited data, is of great interest and importance for intelligence gathering, as well as for humanitarian assistance and disaster relief (HADR). Deploying ASR systems in these languages often relies on cross-lingual acoustic modeling followed by supervised adaptation and almost always assumes that either a pronunciation lexicon using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), and/or some amount of transcribed speech exist in the new language of interest. For many languages, neither requirement is generally true -- only a limited amount of text and untranscribed audio is available. This work focuses specifically on scalable techniques for building ASR systems in most languages without any existing transcribed speech or pronunciation lexicons. We first demonstrate how cross-lingual acoustic model transfer, when phonemic pronunciation lexicons do exist in a new language, can significantly reduce the need for target-language transcribed speech. We then explore three methods for handling languages without a pronunciation lexicon. First we examine the effectiveness of graphemic acoustic model transfer, which allows for pronunciation lexicons to be trivially constructed. We then present two methods for rapid construction of phonemic pronunciation lexicons based on submodular selection of a small set of words for manual annotation, or words from other languages for which we have IPA pronunciations. We also explore techniques for training sequence-to-sequence models with very small amounts of data by transferring models trained on other languages, and leveraging large unpaired text corpora in training. Finally, as an alternative to acoustic model transfer, we present a novel hybrid generative/discriminative semi-supervised training framework that merges recent progress in Energy Based Models (EBMs) as well as lattice-free maximum mutual information (LF-MMI) training, capable of making use of purely untranscribed audio. Together, these techniques enabled ASR capabilities that supported triage of spoken communications in real-world HADR work-flows in many languages using fewer than 30 minutes of transcribed speech. These techniques were successfully applied in multiple NIST evaluations and were among the top-performing systems in each evaluation