46 research outputs found

    A Posthumous Contribution by {Larry Wos}: {E}xcerpts from an Unpublished Column

    Get PDF
    International audienceShortly before Larry Wos passed away, he sent a manuscript for discussion to Sophie Tourret, the editor of the AAR newsletter. We present excerpts from this final manuscript, put it in its historic context and explain its relevance for today’s research in automated reasoning

    Extensional Higher-Order Paramodulation in Leo-III

    Get PDF
    Leo-III is an automated theorem prover for extensional type theory with Henkin semantics and choice. Reasoning with primitive equality is enabled by adapting paramodulation-based proof search to higher-order logic. The prover may cooperate with multiple external specialist reasoning systems such as first-order provers and SMT solvers. Leo-III is compatible with the TPTP/TSTP framework for input formats, reporting results and proofs, and standardized communication between reasoning systems, enabling e.g. proof reconstruction from within proof assistants such as Isabelle/HOL. Leo-III supports reasoning in polymorphic first-order and higher-order logic, in all normal quantified modal logics, as well as in different deontic logics. Its development had initiated the ongoing extension of the TPTP infrastructure to reasoning within non-classical logics.Comment: 34 pages, 7 Figures, 1 Table; submitted articl

    Template-Based Conjecturing for Automated Induction in Isabelle/HOL

    Full text link
    Proof by induction plays a central role in formal verification. However, its automation remains as a formidable challenge in Computer Science. To solve inductive problems, human engineers often have to provide auxiliary lemmas manually. We automate this laborious process with template-based conjecturing, a novel approach to generate auxiliary lemmas and use them to prove final goals. Our evaluation shows that our working prototype, TBC, achieved 40 percentage point improvement of success rates for problems at intermediate difficulty level.Comment: To appear at Fundamentals of Software engineering 2023 (http://fsen.ir/2023/

    SPASS-SATT: A CDCL(LA) Solver

    Get PDF
    International audienceSPASS-SATT is a CDCL(LA) solver for linear rational and linear mixed/integer arithmetic. This system description explains its specific features: fast cube tests for integer solvability, bounding transformations for unbounded problems, close interaction between the SAT solver and the theory solver, efficient data structures, and small-clause-normal-form generation. SPASS-SATT is currently one of the strongest systems on the respective SMT-LIB benchmarks

    The Tactician (extended version): A Seamless, Interactive Tactic Learner and Prover for Coq

    Full text link
    We present Tactician, a tactic learner and prover for the Coq Proof Assistant. Tactician helps users make tactical proof decisions while they retain control over the general proof strategy. To this end, Tactician learns from previously written tactic scripts and gives users either suggestions about the next tactic to be executed or altogether takes over the burden of proof synthesis. Tactician's goal is to provide users with a seamless, interactive, and intuitive experience together with robust and adaptive proof automation. In this paper, we give an overview of Tactician from the user's point of view, regarding both day-to-day usage and issues of package dependency management while learning in the large. Finally, we give a peek into Tactician's implementation as a Coq plugin and machine learning platform.Comment: 19 pages, 2 figures. This is an extended version of a paper published in CICM-2020. For the project website, see https://coq-tactician.github.i

    On the Verification of Parametric Systems

    Full text link
    We present an approach to the verification of systems for whose description some elements - constants or functions - are underspecified and can be regarded as parameters, and, in particular, describe a method for automatically generating constraints on such parameters under which certain safety conditions are guaranteed to hold. We present an implementation and illustrate its use on several examples.Comment: 26 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1910.0520
    corecore