Improving speech intelligibility in hearing aids. Part II: Quality assessment

[EN] Subjective tests are the most reliable methods for quantifying the perceived speech intelligibility, but the process to perform these tests usually is time consuming and cost expensive. For this reason, different objective measures have been proposed in the literature to evaluate the intelligibility and/or quality of speech in such a way that cooperation of human listeners is not necessary. In this paper, we describe a wide range of subjective tests reported in the literature, focusing on those proposed to evaluate speech intelligibility of Spanish language, not only for normal hearing listeners, but for hearing impaired as well. Afterwards we summarize the most common objective measures of speech quality, and finally we perform a comparison between them and some subjective speech intelligibility tests. In the subjective tests, clean Spanish speech material has been contaminated with different real background noises: cafeteria and outside traffic noise. Results show that Short-Time Objective Intelligibility (STOI) and Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ) indices present a better correlation and a lower mean square error when predicting intelligibility compared to other objective measures tested.This work has been supported by European Union ERDF and Spanish Government through TEC2012-38142-C04 project, and Generalitat Valenciana through PROMETEOII/2014/003 project. Participation of author A. Padilla has been supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from Conacyt (Mexico). The authors wish to acknowledge Prof. Felipe Orduña for his insightful comments that contributed to improve the manuscript, and to everyone who participated in the listening tests.Padilla, A.; Piñero Sipán, MG.; Diego Antón, MD.; Ferrer Contreras, M.; González Téllez, A.; Ayllón, D.; Gil Pita, R.... (2014). Improving speech intelligibility in hearing aids. Part II: Quality assessment. Waves. 6:73-85. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/57900S7385

Assessment of objective quality measures for speech intelligibility estimation

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the accuracy of automatic speech recognition (ASR) and 6 other well-reported objective quality measures for the task of estimating speech intelligibility. It is believed to be the first assessment of such a range of measures side-by-side and in the context of intelligibility. A total of 39 degradation conditions including those from a newly proposed low bit rate (0.3 to 1.5kbps) codec and a noise suppression system are considered. They provide real and varied scenarios to assess the measures. The objective scores are compared to subjective listening scores, and their correlation used to assess the approach. All tests are conducted on the European standard Aurora 2 corpus. Experiments show that ASR and perceptual estimation of speech quality (PESQ) are potentially reliable estimators of intelligibility with subjective correlation as high as 0.99 and 0.96 respectively. Furthermore, ASR gives a trend corresponding to that of subjective intelligibility assessment for the different configurations of the new codec, while most others fail

"Can you hear me now?":Automatic assessment of background noise intrusiveness and speech intelligibility in telecommunications

This thesis deals with signal-based methods that predict how listeners perceive speech quality in telecommunications. Such tools, called objective quality measures, are of great interest in the telecommunications industry to evaluate how new or deployed systems affect the end-user quality of experience. Two widely used measures, ITU-T Recommendations P.862 âPESQâ and P.863 âPOLQAâ, predict the overall listening quality of a speech signal as it would be rated by an average listener, but do not provide further insight into the composition of that score. This is in contrast to modern telecommunication systems, in which components such as noise reduction or speech coding process speech and non-speech signal parts differently. Therefore, there has been a growing interest for objective measures that assess different quality features of speech signals, allowing for a more nuanced analysis of how these components affect quality. In this context, the present thesis addresses the objective assessment of two quality features: background noise intrusiveness and speech intelligibility. The perception of background noise is investigated with newly collected datasets, including signals that go beyond the traditional telephone bandwidth, as well as Lombard (effortful) speech. We analyze listener scores for noise intrusiveness, and their relation to scores for perceived speech distortion and overall quality. We then propose a novel objective measure of noise intrusiveness that uses a sparse representation of noise as a model of high-level auditory coding. The proposed approach is shown to yield results that highly correlate with listener scores, without requiring training data. With respect to speech intelligibility, we focus on the case where the signal is degraded by strong background noises or very low bit-rate coding. Considering that listeners use prior linguistic knowledge in assessing intelligibility, we propose an objective measure that works at the phoneme level and performs a comparison of phoneme class-conditional probability estimations. The proposed approach is evaluated on a large corpus of recordings from public safety communication systems that use low bit-rate coding, and further extended to the assessment of synthetic speech, showing its applicability to a large range of distortion types. The effectiveness of both measures is evaluated with standardized performance metrics, using corpora that follow established recommendations for subjective listening tests

Objective assessment of speech intelligibility.

This thesis addresses the topic of objective speech intelligibility assessment. Speech intelligibility is becoming an important issue due most possibly to the rapid growth in digital communication systems in recent decades; as well as the increasing demand for security-based applications where intelligibility, rather than the overall quality, is the priority. Afterall, the loss of intelligibility means that communication does not exist. This research sets out to investigate the potential of automatic speech recognition (ASR) in intelligibility assessment, the motivation being the obvious link between word recognition and intelligibility. As a pre-cursor, quality measures are first considered since intelligibility is an attribute encompassed in overall quality. Here, 9 prominent quality measures including the state-of-the-art Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ) are assessed. A large range of degradations are considered including additive noise and those introduced by coding and enhancement schemes. Experimental results show that apart from Weighted Spectral Slope (WSS), generally the quality scores from all other quality measures considered here correlate poorly with intelligibility. Poor correlations are observed especially when dealing with speech-like noises and degradations introduced by enhancement processes. ASR is then considered where various word recognition statistics, namely word accuracy, percentage correct, deletion, substitution and insertion are assessed as potential intelligibility measure. One critical contribution is the observation that there are links between different ASR statistics and different forms of degradation. Such links enable suitable statistics to be chosen for intelligibility assessment in different applications. In overall word accuracy from an ASR system trained on clean signals has the highest correlation with intelligibility. However, as is the case with quality measures, none of the ASR scores correlate well in the context of enhancement schemes since such processes are known to improve machine-based scores without necessarily improving intelligibility. This demonstrates the limitation of ASR in intelligibility assessment. As an extension to word modelling in ASR, one major contribution of this work relates to the novel use of a data-driven (DD) classifier in this context. The classifier is trained on intelligibility information and its output scores relate directly to intelligibility rather than indirectly through quality or ASR scores as in earlier attempts. A critical obstacle with the development of such a DD classifier is establishing the large amount of ground truth necessary for training. This leads to the next significant contribution, namely the proposal of a convenient strategy to generate potentially unlimited amounts of synthetic ground truth based on a well-supported hypothesis that speech processings rarely improve intelligibility. Subsequent contributions include the search for good features that could enhance classification accuracy. Scores given by quality measures and ASR are indicative of intelligibility hence could serve as potential features for the data-driven intelligibility classifier. Both are in investigated in this research and results show ASR-based features to be superior. A final contribution is a novel feature set based on the concept of anchor models where each anchor represents a chosen degradation. Signal intelligibility is characterised by the similarity between the degradation under test and a cohort of degradation anchors. The anchoring feature set leads to an average classification accuracy of 88% with synthetic ground truth and 82% with human ground truth evaluation sets. The latter compares favourably with 69% achieved by WSS (the best quality measure) and 68% by word accuracy from a clean-trained ASR (the best ASR-based measure) which are assessed on identical test sets

Attention-based Speech Enhancement Using Human Quality Perception Modelling

Perceptually-inspired objective functions such as the perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ), signal-to-distortion ratio (SDR), and short-time objective intelligibility (STOI), have recently been used to optimize performance of deep-learning-based speech enhancement algorithms. These objective functions, however, do not always strongly correlate with a listener's assessment of perceptual quality, so optimizing with these measures often results in poorer performance in real-world scenarios. In this work, we propose an attention-based enhancement approach that uses learned speech embedding vectors from a mean-opinion score (MOS) prediction model and a speech enhancement module to jointly enhance noisy speech. The MOS prediction model estimates the perceptual MOS of speech quality, as assessed by human listeners, directly from the audio signal. The enhancement module also employs a quantized language model that enforces spectral constraints for better speech realism and performance. We train the model using real-world noisy speech data that has been captured in everyday environments and test it using unseen corpora. The results show that our proposed approach significantly outperforms other approaches that are optimized with objective measures, where the predicted quality scores strongly correlate with human judgments.Comment: 11 pages, 4 figures, 3 tables, submitted in journal TASLP 202

Objective measures for predicting the intelligibility of spectrally smoothed speech with artificial excitation

A study is presented on how well objective measures of speech quality and intelligibility can predict the subjective in- telligibility of speech that has undergone spectral envelope smoothing and simplification of its excitation. Speech modi- fications are made by resynthesising speech that has been spec- trally smoothed. Objective measures are applied to the mod- ified speech and include measures of speech quality, signal- to-noise ratio and intelligibility, as well as proposing the nor- malised frequency-weighted spectral distortion (NFD) measure. The measures are compared to subjective intelligibility scores where it is found that several have high correlation (|r| ≥ 0.7), with NFD achieving the highest correlation (r = −0.81

Relating Objective and Subjective Performance Measures for AAM-based Visual Speech Synthesizers

We compare two approaches for synthesizing visual speech using Active Appearance Models (AAMs): one that utilizes acoustic features as input, and one that utilizes a phonetic transcription as input. Both synthesizers are trained using the same data and the performance is measured using both objective and subjective testing. We investigate the impact of likely sources of error in the synthesized visual speech by introducing typical errors into real visual speech sequences and subjectively measuring the perceived degradation. When only a small region (e.g. a single syllable) of ground-truth visual speech is incorrect we find that the subjective score for the entire sequence is subjectively lower than sequences generated by our synthesizers. This observation motivates further consideration of an often ignored issue, which is to what extent are subjective measures correlated with objective measures of performance? Significantly, we find that the most commonly used objective measures of performance are not necessarily the best indicator of viewer perception of quality. We empirically evaluate alternatives and show that the cost of a dynamic time warp of synthesized visual speech parameters to the respective ground-truth parameters is a better indicator of subjective quality

Speech and language therapy versus placebo or no intervention for speech problems in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease patients commonly suffer from speech and vocal problems including dysarthric speech, reduced loudness and loss of articulation. These symptoms increase in frequency and intensity with progression of the disease). Speech and language therapy (SLT) aims to improve the intelligibility of speech with behavioural treatment techniques or instrumental aids