Diffusion-weighted MRI radiomics of spine bone tumors: feature stability and machine learning-based classification performance

Purpose To evaluate stability and machine learning-based classification performance of radiomic features of spine bone tumors using diffusion- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Material and methods This retrospective study included 101 patients with histology-proven spine bone tumor (22 benign; 38 primary malignant; 41 metastatic). All tumor volumes were manually segmented on morphologic T2-weighted sequences. The same region of interest (ROI) was used to perform radiomic analysis on ADC map. A total of 1702 radiomic features was considered. Feature stability was assessed through small geometrical transformations of the ROIs mimicking multiple manual delineations. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) quantified feature stability. Feature selection consisted of stability-based (ICC > 0.75) and significance-based selections (ranking features by decreasing Mann-Whitney p-value). Class balancing was performed to oversample the minority (i.e., benign) class. Selected features were used to train and test a support vector machine (SVM) to discriminate benign from malignant spine tumors using tenfold cross-validation. Results A total of 76.4% radiomic features were stable. The quality metrics for the SVM were evaluated as a function of the number of selected features. The radiomic model with the best performance and the lowest number of features for classifying tumor types included 8 features. The metrics were 78% sensitivity, 68% specificity, 76% accuracy and AUC 0.78. Conclusion SVM classifiers based on radiomic features extracted from T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging with ADC map are promising for classification of spine bone tumors. Radiomic features of spine bone tumors show good reproducibility rates

MRI-based radiomic prognostic signature for locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: development, testing and comparison with genomic prognostic signatures

Background. At present, the prognostic prediction in advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is based on the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system, and the most used imaging modality in these patients is magnetic resonance image (MRI). With the aim to improve the prediction, we developed an MRI-based radiomic signature as a prognostic marker for overall survival (OS) in OCSCC patients and compared it with published gene expression signatures for prognosis of OS in head and neck cancer patients, replicated herein on our OCSCC dataset.MethodsFor each patient, 1072 radiomic features were extracted from T1 and T2-weighted MRI (T1w and T2w). Features selection was performed, and an optimal set of five of them was used to fit a Cox proportional hazard regression model for OS. The radiomic signature was developed on a multi-centric locally advanced OCSCC retrospective dataset (n = 123) and validated on a prospective cohort (n = 108).ResultsThe performance of the signature was evaluated in terms of C-index (0.68 (IQR 0.66-0.70)), hazard ratio (HR 2.64 (95% CI 1.62-4.31)), and high/low risk group stratification (log-rank p < 0.001, Kaplan-Meier curves). When tested on a multi-centric prospective cohort (n = 108), the signature had a C-index of 0.62 (IQR 0.58-0.64) and outperformed the clinical and pathologic TNM stage and six out of seven gene expression prognostic signatures. In addition, the significant difference of the radiomic signature between stages III and IVa/b in patients receiving surgery suggests a potential association of MRI features with the pathologic stage.ConclusionsOverall, the present study suggests that MRI signatures, containing non-invasive and cost-effective remarkable information, could be exploited as prognostic tools

Quantitative imaging in radiation oncology

Artificially intelligent eyes, built on machine and deep learning technologies, can empower our capability of analysing patients’ images. By revealing information invisible at our eyes, we can build decision aids that help our clinicians to provide more effective treatment, while reducing side effects. The power of these decision aids is to be based on patient tumour biologically unique properties, referred to as biomarkers. To fully translate this technology into the clinic we need to overcome barriers related to the reliability of image-derived biomarkers, trustiness in AI algorithms and privacy-related issues that hamper the validation of the biomarkers. This thesis developed methodologies to solve the presented issues, defining a road map for the responsible usage of quantitative imaging into the clinic as decision support system for better patient care

Validated imaging biomarkers as decision-making tools in clinical trials and routine practice: current status and recommendations from the EIBALL* subcommittee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Abstract: Observer-driven pattern recognition is the standard for interpretation of medical images. To achieve global parity in interpretation, semi-quantitative scoring systems have been developed based on observer assessments; these are widely used in scoring coronary artery disease, the arthritides and neurological conditions and for indicating the likelihood of malignancy. However, in an era of machine learning and artificial intelligence, it is increasingly desirable that we extract quantitative biomarkers from medical images that inform on disease detection, characterisation, monitoring and assessment of response to treatment. Quantitation has the potential to provide objective decision-support tools in the management pathway of patients. Despite this, the quantitative potential of imaging remains under-exploited because of variability of the measurement, lack of harmonised systems for data acquisition and analysis, and crucially, a paucity of evidence on how such quantitation potentially affects clinical decision-making and patient outcome. This article reviews the current evidence for the use of semi-quantitative and quantitative biomarkers in clinical settings at various stages of the disease pathway including diagnosis, staging and prognosis, as well as predicting and detecting treatment response. It critically appraises current practice and sets out recommendations for using imaging objectively to drive patient management decisions

Combination Analysis of a Radiomics-Based Predictive Model With Clinical Indicators for the Preoperative Assessment of Histological Grade in Endometrial Carcinoma

BackgroundHistological grade is one of the most important prognostic factors of endometrial carcinoma (EC) and when selecting preoperative treatment methods, conducting accurate preoperative grading is of great significance.PurposeTo develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics-based nomogram for discriminating histological grades 1 and 2 (G1 and G2) from grade 3 (G3) EC.MethodsThis was a retrospective study included 358 patients with histologically graded EC, stratified as 250 patients in a training cohort and 108 patients in a test cohort. T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and a dynamic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (3D-VIBE) were performed via 1.5-Tesla MRI. To establish ModelADC, the region of interest was manually outlined on the EC in an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. To establish the radiomic model (ModelR), EC was manually segmented by two independent radiologists and radiomic features were extracted. The Radscore was calculated based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. We combined the Radscore with carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and body mass index (BMI) to construct a mixed model (ModelM) and develop the predictive nomogram. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves were assessed to verify the prediction ability and the degree of consistency, respectively.ResultsAll three models showed some amount of predictive ability. Using ADC alone to predict the histological risk of EC was limited in both the cohort [area under the curve (AUC), 0.715; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.6509–0.7792] and test cohorts (AUC, 0.621; 95% CI, 0.515–0.726). In comparison with ModelADC, the discrimination ability of ModelR showed improvement (Delong test, P < 0.0001 for both the training and test cohorts). ModelM, established based on the combination of radiomic and clinical indicators, showed the best level of predictive ability in both the training (AUC, 0.925; 95% CI, 0.898–0.951) and test cohorts (AUC, 0.915; 95% CI, 0.863–0.968). Calibration curves suggested a good fit for probability (Hosmer–Lemeshow test, P = 0.673 and P = 0.804 for the training and test cohorts, respectively).ConclusionThe described radiomics-based nomogram can be used to predict EC histological classification preoperatively

Repeatability of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Radiomics: A Multi-Centre Multi-Vendor Test-Retest Study

Aims: To evaluate the repeatability of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) radiomics features on test-retest scanning using a multi-centre multi-vendor dataset with a varied case-mix. Methods and Results: The sample included 54 test-retest studies from the VOLUMES resource (thevolumesresource.com). Images were segmented according to a pre-defined protocol to select three regions of interest (ROI) in end-diastole and end-systole: right ventricle, left ventricle (LV), and LV myocardium. We extracted radiomics shape features from all three ROIs and, additionally, first-order and texture features from the LV myocardium. Overall, 280 features were derived per study. For each feature, we calculated intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), within-subject coefficient of variation, and mean relative difference. We ranked robustness of features according to mean ICC stratified by feature category, ROI, and cardiac phase, demonstrating a wide range of repeatability. There were features with good and excellent repeatability (ICC ≥ 0.75) within all feature categories and ROIs. A high proportion of first-order and texture features had excellent repeatability (ICC ≥ 0.90), however, these categories also contained features with the poorest repeatability (ICC < 0.50). Conclusion: CMR radiomic features have a wide range of repeatability. This paper is intended as a reference for future researchers to guide selection of the most robust features for clinical CMR radiomics models. Further work in larger and richer datasets is needed to further define the technical performance and clinical utility of CMR radiomics

MRI-based radiomics: Quantifying the stability and reproducibility of tumour heterogeneity in vivo and in a 3D printed phantom

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a key component in the oncology workflow. Radiomics analysis is a new approach that uses standard of care (SOC) magnetic resonance (MR) images to non-invasively characterise tumour heterogeneity. For radiomics to be reliable, the imaging features measured must be stable and reproducible. This thesis aims to quantify the stability and reproducibility of MRI-based radiomics in vivo and in a 3D printed phantom. Chapter 4 explores the feasibility of constructing a 3D printed phantom using an MRI visible material (‘red resin’). The study shows that the material used to construct an anthropomorphic skull phantom mimicked human cortical bone with a T2* of 411 ± 19 µs. The phantom material provided sufficient signal for tissue segmentation however was only visible with an ultrashort echo time sequence, not commonly used in SOC imaging. Chapter 5 investigates a high temperature resin (‘white resin’) where a texture object was developed for analysis. The ‘white resin’ was visible using SOC sequences. The interscanner repeatability measurements of the texture phantom demonstrated high reproducibility with 76% of texture features having an ICC > 0.9. In chapter 6, further texture and shape objects were developed and employed in a multi-centre study assessing inter and intrascanner variation of MRI-based radiomics. The phantom was stable over a period of 12 months, with a T1 and T2 of 150.7 ± 6.7 ms and 56.1 ± 3.9 ms, respectively. The study also found that histogram features were more stable (ICC > 0.8 for 67%) compared to texture (ICC > 0.8 for 58%) and shape texture (ICC > 0.8 for 0%) across the 8 scanners. In chapter 7, phantom measurements found that radiomics features were more sensitive to changes of image resolution and noise. The in vivo test-retest component of chapter 7 detected many unstable features not suitable for use in a radiomics prognostic model. In chapter 8, of the 83 features computed only 19 features had significant changes between the baseline, mid and post radiation treatment and may be informative to assess rectal cancer treatment response. When considering using radiomics analysis for SOC MRI scans, caution must be taken to ensure imaging protocols, imaging equipment including scanners and coils are consistent to improve intra and inter-institutional feature robustness. This can be achieved with regular quality assurance (QA) of imaging protocols using a suitable phantom and appropriate feature selection using phantom and in vivo datasets

Studies on Category Prediction of Ovarian Cancers Based on Magnetic Resonance Images

Ovarian cancer is the gynecological malignant tumor with low early diagnosis rate and high mortality. Ovarian epithelial cancer (OEC) is the most common subtype of ovarian cancer. Pathologically, OEC is divided into two subtypes: Type I and Type II. These two subtypes of OEC have different biological characteristics and treatment response. Therefore, it is important to accurately categorize these two groups of patients and provide the reference for clinicians in designing treatment plans. In the current magnetic resonance (MR) examination, the diagnoses given by the radiologists are largely based on individual judgment and not sufficiently accurate. Because of the low accuracy of the results and the risk of suffering Type II OEC, most patients will undertake the fine-needle aspiration, which may cause harm to patients’ bodies. Therefore, there is need for the method for OEC subtype classification based on MR images. This thesis proposes the automatic diagnosis system of ovarian cancer based on the combination of deep learning and radiomics. The method utilizes four common useful sequences for ovarian cancer diagnosis: sagittal fat-suppressed T2WI (Sag-fs-T2WI), coronal T2WI (Cor-T2WI), axial T1WI (Axi-T1WI), and apparent diffusion coefficient map (ADC) to establish a multi-sequence diagnostic model. The system starts with the segmentation of the ovarian tumors, and then obtains the radiomic features from lesion parts together with the network features. Selected Features are used to build model to predict the malignancy of ovarian cancers, the subtype of OEC and the survival condition. Bi-atten-ResUnet is proposed in this thesis as the segmentation model. The network is established on the basis of U-Net with adopting Residual block and non-local attention module. It preserves the classic encoder/decoder architecture in the U-Net network. The encoder part is reconstructed by the pretrained ResNet to make use of transfer learning knowledge, and bi-non-local attention modules are added to the decoder part on each level. The application of these techniques enhances the network’s performance in segmentation tasks. The model achieves 0.918, 0.905, 0.831, and 0.820 Dice coefficient respectively in segmenting on four MR sequences. After the segmentation work, the thesis proposes a diagnostic model with three steps: quantitative description feature extraction, feature selection, and establishment of prediction models. First, radiomic features and network features are obtained. Then iterative sparse representation (ISR) method is adopted as the feature selection to reduce the redundancy and correlation. The selected features are used to establish a predictive model, and support vector machine (SVM) is used as the classifier. The model achieves an AUC of 0.967 in distinguishing between benign and malignant ovarian tumors. For discriminating Type I and Type II OEC, the model yields an AUC of 0.823. In the survival prediction, patients categorized in high risk group are more likely to have poor prognosis with hazard ratio 4.169