Assessing and refining mappings to RDF to improve dataset quality

RDF dataset quality assessment is currently performed primarily after data is published. However, there is neither a systematic way to incorporate its results into the dataset nor the assessment into the publishing workflow. Adjustments are manually -but rarely- applied. Nevertheless, the root of the violations which often derive from the mappings that specify how the RDF dataset will be generated, is not identified. We suggest an incremental, iterative and uniform validation workflow for RDF datasets stemming originally from (semi-) structured data (e.g., CSV, XML, JSON). In this work, we focus on assessing and improving their mappings. We incorporate (i) a test-driven approach for assessing the mappings instead of the RDF dataset itself, as mappings reflect how the dataset will be formed when generated; and (ii) perform semi-automatic mapping refinements based on the results of the quality assessment. The proposed workflow is applied to diverse cases, e.g., large, crowdsourced datasets such as DBpedia, or newly generated, such as iLastic. Our evaluation indicates the efficiency of our workflow, as it significantly improves the overall quality of an RDF dataset in the observed cases

Assessing the quality of geospatial linked data – experiences from Ordnance Survey Ireland (OSi)

Ordnance Survey Ireland (OSi) is Ireland’s national mapping agency that is responsible for the digitisation of the island’s infrastructure in terms of mapping. Generating data from various sensors (e.g. spatial sensors), OSi build its knowledge in the Prime2 framework, a subset of which is transformed into geo-Linked Data. In this paper we discuss how the quality of the generated sematic data fares against datasets in the LOD cloud. We set up Luzzu, a scalable Linked Data quality assessment framework, in the OSi pipeline to continuously assess produced data in order to tackle any quality problems prior to publishing

GeoTriples: Transforming geospatial data into RDF graphs using R2RML and RML mappings

A lot of geospatial data has become available at no charge in many countries recently. Geospatial data that is currently made available by government agencies usually do not follow the linked data paradigm. In the few cases where government agencies do follow the linked data paradigm (e.g., Ordnance Survey in the United Kingdom), specialized scripts have been used for transforming geospatial data into RDF. In this paper we present the open source tool GeoTriples which generates and processes extended R2RML and RML mappings that transform geospatial data from many input formats into RDF. GeoTriples allows the transformation of geospatial data stored in raw files (shapefiles, CSV, KML, XML, GML and GeoJSON) and spatially-enabled RDBMS (PostGIS and MonetDB) into RDF graphs using well-known vocabularies like GeoSPARQL and stSPARQL, but without being tightly coupled to a specific vocabulary. GeoTriples has been developed in European projects LEO and Melodies and has been used to transform many geospatial data sources into linked data. We study the performance of GeoTriples experimentally using large publicly available geospatial datasets, and show that GeoTriples is very efficient and scalable especially when its mapping processor is implemented using Apache Hadoop

Towards a uniform user interface for editing data shapes

C

RODI: Benchmarking Relational-to-Ontology Mapping Generation Quality

Accessing and utilizing enterprise or Web data that is scattered across multiple data sources is an important task for both applications and users. Ontology-based data integration, where an ontology mediates between the raw data and its consumers, is a promising approach to facilitate such scenarios. This approach crucially relies on useful mappings to relate the ontology and the data, the latter being typically stored in relational databases. A number of systems to support the construction of such mappings have recently been developed. A generic and effective benchmark for reliable and comparable evaluation of the practical utility of such systems would make an important contribution to the development of ontology-based data integration systems and their application in practice. We have proposed such a benchmark, called RODI. In this paper, we present a new version of RODI, which significantly extends our previous benchmark, and we evaluate various systems with it. RODI includes test scenarios from the domains of scientific conferences, geographical data, and oil and gas exploration. Scenarios are constituted of databases, ontologies, and queries to test expected results. Systems that compute relational-to-ontology mappings can be evaluated using RODI by checking how well they can handle various features of relational schemas and ontologies, and how well the computed mappings work for query answering. Using RODI, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of seven systems