13,829 research outputs found
Introducing fuzzy trust for managing belief conflict over semantic web data
Interpreting Semantic Web Data by different human experts can end up in scenarios, where each expert comes up with different and conflicting ideas what a concept can mean and how they relate to other concepts. Software agents that operate on the Semantic Web have to deal with similar scenarios where the interpretation of Semantic Web data that describes the heterogeneous sources becomes contradicting. One such application area of the Semantic Web is ontology mapping where different similarities have to be combined into a more reliable and coherent view, which might easily become unreliable if the conflicting
beliefs in similarities are not managed effectively between the different agents. In this paper we propose a solution for managing this conflict by introducing trust between the mapping agents based on the fuzzy voting model
Improving Ontology Recommendation and Reuse in WebCORE by Collaborative Assessments
In this work, we present an extension of CORE [8], a tool for Collaborative Ontology Reuse and Evaluation. The system receives an informal description of a specific semantic domain and determines which ontologies from a repository are the most appropriate to describe the given domain. For this task, the environment is divided into three modules. The first component receives the problem description as a set of terms, and allows the user to refine and enlarge it using WordNet. The second module applies multiple automatic criteria to evaluate the ontologies of the repository, and determines which ones fit best the problem description. A ranked list of ontologies is returned for each criterion, and the lists are combined by means of rank fusion techniques. Finally, the third component uses manual user evaluations in order to incorporate a human, collaborative assessment of the ontologies. The new version of the system incorporates several novelties, such as its implementation as a web application; the incorporation of a NLP module to manage the problem definitions; modifications on the automatic ontology retrieval strategies; and a collaborative framework to find potential relevant terms according to previous user queries. Finally, we present some early experiments on ontology retrieval and evaluation, showing the benefits of our system
Pragmatic Ontology Evolution: Reconciling User Requirements and Application Performance
Increasingly, organizations are adopting ontologies to describe their large catalogues of items. These ontologies need to evolve regularly in response to changes in the domain and the emergence of new requirements. An important step of this process is the selection of candidate concepts to include in the new version of the ontology. This operation needs to take into account a variety of factors and in particular reconcile user requirements and application performance. Current ontology evolution methods focus either on ranking concepts according to their relevance or on preserving compatibility with existing applications. However, they do not take in consideration the impact of the ontology evolution process on the performance of computational tasks – e.g., in this work we focus on instance tagging, similarity computation, generation of recommendations, and data clustering. In this paper, we propose the Pragmatic Ontology Evolution (POE) framework, a novel approach for selecting from a group of candidates a set of concepts able to produce a new version of a given ontology that i) is consistent with the a set of user requirements (e.g., max number of concepts in the ontology), ii) is parametrised with respect to a number of dimensions (e.g., topological considerations), and iii) effectively supports relevant computational tasks. Our approach also supports users in navigating the space of possible solutions by showing how certain choices, such as limiting the number of concepts or privileging trendy concepts rather than historical ones, would reflect on the application performance. An evaluation of POE on the real-world scenario of the evolving Springer Nature taxonomy for editorial classification yielded excellent results, demonstrating a significant improvement over alternative approaches
Ontology-Based Quality Evaluation of Value Generalization Hierarchies for Data Anonymization
In privacy-preserving data publishing, approaches using Value Generalization
Hierarchies (VGHs) form an important class of anonymization algorithms. VGHs
play a key role in the utility of published datasets as they dictate how the
anonymization of the data occurs. For categorical attributes, it is imperative
to preserve the semantics of the original data in order to achieve a higher
utility. Despite this, semantics have not being formally considered in the
specification of VGHs. Moreover, there are no methods that allow the users to
assess the quality of their VGH. In this paper, we propose a measurement
scheme, based on ontologies, to quantitatively evaluate the quality of VGHs, in
terms of semantic consistency and taxonomic organization, with the aim of
producing higher-quality anonymizations. We demonstrate, through a case study,
how our evaluation scheme can be used to compare the quality of multiple VGHs
and can help to identify faulty VGHs.Comment: 18 pages, 7 figures, presented in the Privacy in Statistical
Databases Conference 2014 (Ibiza, Spain
A Large Scale Dataset for the Evaluation of Ontology Matching Systems
Recently, the number of ontology matching techniques and systems has increased significantly. This makes the issue of their evaluation and comparison more severe. One of the challenges of the ontology matching evaluation is in building large scale evaluation datasets. In fact, the number of possible correspondences between two ontologies grows quadratically with respect to the numbers of entities in these ontologies. This often makes the manual construction of the evaluation datasets demanding to the point of being infeasible for large scale matching tasks. In this paper we present an ontology matching evaluation dataset composed of thousands of matching tasks, called TaxME2. It was built semi-automatically out of the Google, Yahoo and Looksmart web directories. We evaluated TaxME2 by exploiting the results of almost two dozen of state of the art ontology matching systems. The experiments indicate that the dataset possesses the desired key properties, namely it is error-free, incremental, discriminative, monotonic, and hard for the state of the art ontology matching systems. The paper has been accepted for publication in "The Knowledge Engineering Review", Cambridge Universty Press (ISSN: 0269-8889, EISSN: 1469-8005)
A Survey of Volunteered Open Geo-Knowledge Bases in the Semantic Web
Over the past decade, rapid advances in web technologies, coupled with
innovative models of spatial data collection and consumption, have generated a
robust growth in geo-referenced information, resulting in spatial information
overload. Increasing 'geographic intelligence' in traditional text-based
information retrieval has become a prominent approach to respond to this issue
and to fulfill users' spatial information needs. Numerous efforts in the
Semantic Geospatial Web, Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI), and the
Linking Open Data initiative have converged in a constellation of open
knowledge bases, freely available online. In this article, we survey these open
knowledge bases, focusing on their geospatial dimension. Particular attention
is devoted to the crucial issue of the quality of geo-knowledge bases, as well
as of crowdsourced data. A new knowledge base, the OpenStreetMap Semantic
Network, is outlined as our contribution to this area. Research directions in
information integration and Geographic Information Retrieval (GIR) are then
reviewed, with a critical discussion of their current limitations and future
prospects
Recommended from our members
Investigating the use of background knowledge for assessing the relevance of statements to an ontology in ontology evolution
The tasks of learning and enriching ontologies with new concepts and relations have attracted a lot of attention in the research community, leading to a number of tools facilitating the process of building and updating ontologies. These tools often discover new elements of information to be included in the considered ontology from external data sources such as text documents or databases, transforming these elements into ontology compatible statements or axioms. While some techniques are used to make sure that statements to be added are compatible with the ontology (e.g. through conflict detection), such tools generally pay little attention to the relevance of the statement in question. It is either assumed that any statement extracted from a data source is relevant, or that the user will assess whether a statement adds value to the ontology. In this paper, we investigate the use of background knowledge about the context where statements appear to assess their relevance. We devise a methodology to extract such a context from ontologies available online, to map it to the considered ontology and to visualize this mapping in a way that allows to study the intersection and complementarity of the two sources of knowledge. By applying this methodology on several examples, we identified an initial set of patterns giving strong indications concerning the relevance of a statement, as well as interesting issues to be considered when applying such techniques
Statistical mechanics of ontology based annotations
We present a statistical mechanical theory of the process of annotating an
object with terms selected from an ontology. The term selection process is
formulated as an ideal lattice gas model, but in a highly structured
inhomogeneous field. The model enables us to explain patterns recently observed
in real-world annotation data sets, in terms of the underlying graph structure
of the ontology. By relating the external field strengths to the information
content of each node in the ontology graph, the statistical mechanical model
also allows us to propose a number of practical metrics for assessing the
quality of both the ontology, and the annotations that arise from its use.
Using the statistical mechanical formalism we also study an ensemble of
ontologies of differing size and complexity; an analysis not readily performed
using real data alone. Focusing on regular tree ontology graphs we uncover a
rich set of scaling laws describing the growth in the optimal ontology size as
the number of objects being annotated increases. In doing so we provide a
further possible measure for assessment of ontologies.Comment: 27 pages, 5 figure
An information retrieval approach to ontology mapping
In this paper, we present a heuristic mapping method and a prototype mapping system that support the process of semi-automatic ontology mapping for the purpose of improving semantic interoperability in heterogeneous systems. The approach is based on the idea of semantic enrichment, i.e., using instance information of the ontology to enrich the original ontology and calculate similarities between concepts in two ontologies. The functional settings for the mapping system are discussed and the evaluation of the prototype implementation of the approach is reported. \ud
\u
A Semantic Similarity Measure for Expressive Description Logics
A totally semantic measure is presented which is able to calculate a
similarity value between concept descriptions and also between concept
description and individual or between individuals expressed in an expressive
description logic. It is applicable on symbolic descriptions although it uses a
numeric approach for the calculus. Considering that Description Logics stand as
the theoretic framework for the ontological knowledge representation and
reasoning, the proposed measure can be effectively used for agglomerative and
divisional clustering task applied to the semantic web domain.Comment: 13 pages, Appeared at CILC 2005, Convegno Italiano di Logica
Computazionale also available at
http://www.disp.uniroma2.it/CILC2005/downloads/papers/15.dAmato_CILC05.pd
- …