Using a Case-Based Reasoning Approach for Trading in Sports Betting Markets

The sports betting market has emerged as one of the most lucrative markets in recent years. Trading in sports betting markets entails predicting odd movements in order to bet on an outcome, whilst also betting on the opposite outcome, at different odds in order to make a profit, regardless of the final result. These markets are mainly composed by humans, which take decisions according to their past experience in these markets. However, human rational reasoning is limited when taking quick decisions, being influenced by emotional factors and offering limited calibration capabilities for estimating probabilities. In this paper, we show how artificial techniques could be applied to this field and demonstrate that they can outperform even the bevahior of high-experienced humans. To achieve this goal, we propose a case-based reasoning model for trading in sports betting markets, which is integrated in an agent to provide it with the capabilities to take trading decisions based on future odd predictions. In order to test the performance of the system, we compare trading decisions taken by the agent with trading decisions taken by human traders when they compete in real sports betting markets.This work has been partially supported by CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010 under grant CSD2007-00022, and project TIN2011-27652-C03-01. Juan M. Alberola has received a grant from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion de Espana (AP2007-00289).Alberola Oltra, JM.; García Fornes, AM. (2013). Using a Case-Based Reasoning Approach for Trading in Sports Betting Markets. Applied Intelligence. 38(3):465-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-012-0381-9S465477383Aamodt A (1990) Knowledge-intensive case-based reasoning and sustained learning. In: Topics in case-based reasoning. Springer, Berlin, pp 274–288Aamodt A, Plaza E (1994) Case-based reasoning; foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Commun 7(1):39–59Ahn JJ, Byun HW, Oh KJ, Kim TY (2012) Bayesian forecaster using class-based optimization. Appl Intell 36(3):553–563Alberola JM, Garcia-Fornes A, Espinosa A (2010) Price prediction in sports betting markets. In: Proceedings of the 8th German conference on multiagent system technologies, pp 197–208Arias-Aranda D, Castro JL, Navarro M, Zurita JM (2009) A cbr system for knowing the relationship between flexibility and operations strategy. In: Proceedings of the 18th international symposium on foundations of intelligent systems, ISMIS’09, pp 463–472Ates C (2004) Prediction markets are only human: subadditivity in probability judgments. In: MSC in finance and international businessBerlemann M, Schmidt C (2001) Predictive accuracy of political stock markets—empirical evidence from a European perspective. Technical report 2001-57Betfair (2009) http://www.betfaircorporate.comChen Y, Goel S, Pennock D (2008) Pricing combinatorial markets for tournaments. In: STOC’08: proceedings of the 40th annual ACM symposium on theory of computing. ACM Press, New York, pp 305–314Debnath S, Pennock DM, Giles CL, Lawrence S (2003) Information incorporation in online in-game sports betting markets. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM conference on electronic commerce, EC ’03. ACM Press, New York, pp 258–259. doi: 10.1145/779928.779987Fischoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S (1977) Knowing with certainty: the appropriateness of extreme confidence. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 3:552–564Forsythe R, Rietz T, Ross T (1999) Wishes, expectations and actions: a survey on price formation in election stock markets. J Econ Behav Organ 39(1):83–110Fortnow L, Kilian J, Pennock DM, Wellman MP (2005) Betting Boolean-style: a framework for trading in securities based on logical formulas. Decis Support Syst 39(1):87–104. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2004.08.010Gayer G (2010) Perception of probabilities in situations of risk: a case based approach. Games Econ Behav 68(1):130–143Guo M, Pennock D (2009) Combinatorial prediction markets for event hierarchies. In: Proc of the 8th AAMAS’09. Int foundation for autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp 201–208Huang W, Lai K, Nakamori Y, Wang S (2004) Forecasting foreign exchange rates with artificial neural networks: a review. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 3(1):145–165Hüllermeier E (2007) Case-based approximate reasoning. Theory and decision library, vol 44. Springer, BerlinKim K-J, Ahn H (2012) Simultaneous optimization of artificial neural networks for financial forecasting. Appl Intell 36(4):887–898LeBaron B (1998) Agent based computational finance: suggested readings and early research. J Econ Dyn ControlLiu Y, Yang C, Yang Y, Lin F, Du X, Ito T (2012) Case learning for cbr-based collision avoidance systems. Appl Intell 36(2):308–319Love BC (2008) Behavioural finance and sports betting markets. In: MSC in finance and international businessLuque C, Valls JM, Isasi P (2011) Time series prediction evolving Voronoi regions. Appl Intell 34(1):116–126Mantaras RLD, McSherry D, Bridge D, Leake D, Smyth B, Craw S, Faltings B, Maher M, Lou C, Forbus MCK, Keane M, Aamodt A, Watson I (2005) Retrieval, reuse, revision and retention in case-based reasoning. Knowl Eng Rev 20(3):215–240Moody J (1995) Economic forecasting: challenges and neural network solutions. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on artificial neural networksOntañón S, Plaza E (2009) Argumentation-based information exchange in prediction markets. Argument Multi-Agent Syst 5384:181–196Ontañón S, Plaza E (2011) An argumentation framework for learning, information exchange, and joint-deliberation in multi-agent systems. Multiagent Grid Syst 7:95–108Palmer R, Arthur W, Holland J, Lebaron B, Tayler P (1994) Artificial economic life: a simple model of a stock market. Physica D 75:264–274Pennock D, Debnath S, Glover E, Giles C (2002) Modelling information incorporation in markets, with application to detecting and explaining events. In: Proceedings of the 18th annual conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI-02), San Francisco, CA. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, pp 404–405Pennock DM, Lawrence S, Nielsen FÅ, Giles CL (2001) Extracting collective probabilistic forecasts from web games. In: Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD ’01. ACM Press, New York, pp 174–183. doi: 10.1145/502512.502537Plott CR (2000) Markets as information gathering tools. South Econ J 67(1):2–15Qian B, Rasheed K (2007) Stock market prediction with multiple classifiers. Appl Intell 26(1):25–33Raudys S, Zliobaite I (2006) The multi-agent system for prediction of financial time series. In: ICAISC, vol 4029. Springer, Berlin, pp 653–662Schmidt C, Werwatz A (2002) How accurate do markets predict the outcome of an event? The euro 2000 soccer championship experiment, 2002-09. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group. http://ideas.repec.org/p/esi/discus/2002-09.htmlShiu SCK, Pal SK (2004) Case-based reasoning: concepts, features and soft computing. Appl Intell 21(3):233–238Wellman MP, Reeves DM, Lochner KM, Vorobeychik Y (2004) Price prediction in a trading agent competition. J Artif Intell Res 21:19–3

Forecasting of electricity prices in the Spanish electricity market using machine learning tools

The objective of this research assignment was to forecast electricity prices in the Spanish electricity market using three different machine learning techniques: k-nearest neighbours, support vector regression and artificial neural networks. The achieved results were compared and the quality of developed models was evaluated. The project was implemented in Python3.Incomin

Isoelastic Agents and Wealth Updates in Machine Learning Markets

Recently, prediction markets have shown considerable promise for developing flexible mechanisms for machine learning. In this paper, agents with isoelastic utilities are considered. It is shown that the costs associated with homogeneous markets of agents with isoelastic utilities produce equilibrium prices corresponding to alpha-mixtures, with a particular form of mixing component relating to each agent's wealth. We also demonstrate that wealth accumulation for logarithmic and other isoelastic agents (through payoffs on prediction of training targets) can implement both Bayesian model updates and mixture weight updates by imposing different market payoff structures. An iterative algorithm is given for market equilibrium computation. We demonstrate that inhomogeneous markets of agents with isoelastic utilities outperform state of the art aggregate classifiers such as random forests, as well as single classifiers (neural networks, decision trees) on a number of machine learning benchmarks, and show that isoelastic combination methods are generally better than their logarithmic counterparts.Comment: Appears in Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2012

Fuzzy Logic and Its Uses in Finance: A Systematic Review Exploring Its Potential to Deal with Banking Crises

The major success of fuzzy logic in the field of remote control opened the door to its application in many other fields, including finance. However, there has not been an updated and comprehensive literature review on the uses of fuzzy logic in the financial field. For that reason, this study attempts to critically examine fuzzy logic as an effective, useful method to be applied to financial research and, particularly, to the management of banking crises. The data sources were Web of Science and Scopus, followed by an assessment of the records according to pre-established criteria and an arrangement of the information in two main axes: financial markets and corporate finance. A major finding of this analysis is that fuzzy logic has not yet been used to address banking crises or as an alternative to ensure the resolvability of banks while minimizing the impact on the real economy. Therefore, we consider this article relevant for supervisory and regulatory bodies, as well as for banks and academic researchers, since it opens the door to several new research axes on banking crisis analyses using artificial intelligence techniques