18,872 research outputs found
Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal
The importance of a research article is routinely measured by counting how
many times it has been cited. However, treating all citations with equal weight
ignores the wide variety of functions that citations perform. We want to
automatically identify the subset of references in a bibliography that have a
central academic influence on the citing paper. For this purpose, we examine
the effectiveness of a variety of features for determining the academic
influence of a citation. By asking authors to identify the key references in
their own work, we created a data set in which citations were labeled according
to their academic influence. Using automatic feature selection with supervised
machine learning, we found a model for predicting academic influence that
achieves good performance on this data set using only four features. The best
features, among those we evaluated, were those based on the number of times a
reference is mentioned in the body of a citing paper. The performance of these
features inspired us to design an influence-primed h-index (the hip-index).
Unlike the conventional h-index, it weights citations by how many times a
reference is mentioned. According to our experiments, the hip-index is a better
indicator of researcher performance than the conventional h-index
Development of Computer Science Disciplines - A Social Network Analysis Approach
In contrast to many other scientific disciplines, computer science considers
conference publications. Conferences have the advantage of providing fast
publication of papers and of bringing researchers together to present and
discuss the paper with peers. Previous work on knowledge mapping focused on the
map of all sciences or a particular domain based on ISI published JCR (Journal
Citation Report). Although this data covers most of important journals, it
lacks computer science conference and workshop proceedings. That results in an
imprecise and incomplete analysis of the computer science knowledge. This paper
presents an analysis on the computer science knowledge network constructed from
all types of publications, aiming at providing a complete view of computer
science research. Based on the combination of two important digital libraries
(DBLP and CiteSeerX), we study the knowledge network created at
journal/conference level using citation linkage, to identify the development of
sub-disciplines. We investigate the collaborative and citation behavior of
journals/conferences by analyzing the properties of their co-authorship and
citation subgraphs. The paper draws several important conclusions. First,
conferences constitute social structures that shape the computer science
knowledge. Second, computer science is becoming more interdisciplinary. Third,
experts are the key success factor for sustainability of journals/conferences
Learning and Interpreting Multi-Multi-Instance Learning Networks
We introduce an extension of the multi-instance learning problem where
examples are organized as nested bags of instances (e.g., a document could be
represented as a bag of sentences, which in turn are bags of words). This
framework can be useful in various scenarios, such as text and image
classification, but also supervised learning over graphs. As a further
advantage, multi-multi instance learning enables a particular way of
interpreting predictions and the decision function. Our approach is based on a
special neural network layer, called bag-layer, whose units aggregate bags of
inputs of arbitrary size. We prove theoretically that the associated class of
functions contains all Boolean functions over sets of sets of instances and we
provide empirical evidence that functions of this kind can be actually learned
on semi-synthetic datasets. We finally present experiments on text
classification, on citation graphs, and social graph data, which show that our
model obtains competitive results with respect to accuracy when compared to
other approaches such as convolutional networks on graphs, while at the same
time it supports a general approach to interpret the learnt model, as well as
explain individual predictions.Comment: JML
Opinion mining and sentiment analysis in marketing communications: a science mapping analysis in Web of Science (1998–2018)
Opinion mining and sentiment analysis has become ubiquitous in our society, with
applications in online searching, computer vision, image understanding, artificial intelligence and
marketing communications (MarCom). Within this context, opinion mining and sentiment analysis
in marketing communications (OMSAMC) has a strong role in the development of the field by
allowing us to understand whether people are satisfied or dissatisfied with our service or product
in order to subsequently analyze the strengths and weaknesses of those consumer experiences. To
the best of our knowledge, there is no science mapping analysis covering the research about opinion
mining and sentiment analysis in the MarCom ecosystem. In this study, we perform a science
mapping analysis on the OMSAMC research, in order to provide an overview of the scientific work
during the last two decades in this interdisciplinary area and to show trends that could be the basis
for future developments in the field. This study was carried out using VOSviewer, CitNetExplorer
and InCites based on results from Web of Science (WoS). The results of this analysis show the
evolution of the field, by highlighting the most notable authors, institutions, keywords,
publications, countries, categories and journals.The research was funded by Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucía 2014‐2020, grant number “La
reputación de las organizaciones en una sociedad digital. Elaboración de una Plataforma Inteligente para la
Localización, Identificación y Clasificación de Influenciadores en los Medios Sociales Digitales (UMA18‐
FEDERJA‐148)” and The APC was funded by the same research gran
- …