Recommender system based on argumentation by analogy

Argumentation has contributed to the formalization of a reasoning model, similar to the human reasoning. In general, argumentation can be associated with the interaction of reasons in favour and against certain conclusions, so as to determine what conclusions are acceptable. A way of arguing in which the way in which the arguments are constructed, is Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP); this is a formalism that combines logic programming and defeasible argumentation. This work focuses on the strengthening of the reasoning process, identifying partial connections or determinations between knowledge pieces. Through these relations, it is possible to increase the justi cations and foundations that support a particular recommendation, by an analogy process.XV Workshop de Agentes y Sistemas InteligentesRed de Universidades con Carreras de Informática (RedUNCI

An educational recommender system based on argumentation theory

You are free to use the manuscript version of your article for internal, educational or other purposes of your own institution, company or funding agency[EN] Recommender Systems aim to provide users with search results close to their needs, making predictions of their preferences. In virtual learning environments, Educational Recommender Systems deliver learning objects according to the student's characteristics, preferences and learning needs. A learning object is an educational content unit, which once found and retrieved may assist students in their learning process. In previous work, authors have designed and evaluated several recommendation techniques for delivering the most appropriate learning object for each specific student. Also, they have combined these techniques by using hybridization methods, improving the performance of isolated techniques. However, traditional hybridization methods fail when the learning objects delivered by each recommendation technique are very different from those selected by the other techniques (there is no agreement about the best learning object to recommend). In this paper, we present a new recommendation method based on argumentation theory that is able to combine content-based, collaborative and knowledge-based recommendation techniques, or to act as a new recommendation technique. This method provides the students with those objects for which the system is able to generate more arguments to justify their suitability. It has been implemented and tested in the Federation of Learning Objects Repositories of Colombia, getting promising results.This work was partially developed with the aid of the doctoral grant offered to Paula A. Rodriguez by 'Programa Nacional de Formacion de Investigadores - COLCIENCIAS', Colombia and partially funded by the COLCIENCIAS project 1119-569-34172 from the Universidad Nacional de Colombia. It was also supported by the by the projects TIN2015-65515-C4-1-R and TIN2014-55206-R of the Spanish government and by the grant program for the recruitment of doctors for the Spanish system of science and technology (PAID-10-14) of the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia.Rodríguez, P.; Heras, S.; Palanca Cámara, J.; Poveda, JM.; Duque, N.; Julian Inglada, VJ. (2017). An educational recommender system based on argumentation theory. AI Communications. 30(1):19-36. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-170724S1936301Briguez, C. E., Budán, M. C. D., Deagustini, C. A. D., Maguitman, A. G., Capobianco, M., & Simari, G. R. (2014). Argument-based mixed recommenders and their application to movie suggestion. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(14), 6467-6482. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.046BRIGUEZ, C. E., CAPOBIANCO, M., & MAGUITMAN, A. G. (2013). A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR TRUST-BASED NEWS RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION USING DEFEASIBLE ARGUMENTATION. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 22(04), 1350021. doi:10.1142/s0218213013500218R. Burke, Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments, User Modelingand User-Adapted Interaction (2002).Chesñevar, C., Maguitman, A. G., & González, M. P. (2009). Empowering Recommendation Technologies Through Argumentation. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, 403-422. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_20Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Santos, O. C., & Manouselis, N. (2015). Panorama of Recommender Systems to Support Learning. Recommender Systems Handbook, 421-451. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_12N.D. Duque, D.A. Ovalle and J. Moreno, Objetos de aprendizaje, repositorios y federaciones... conocimiento para todos. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2015.Dwivedi, P., & Bharadwaj, K. K. (2013). e-Learning recommender system for a group of learners based on the unified learner profile approach. Expert Systems, 32(2), 264-276. doi:10.1111/exsy.12061GARCÍA, A. J., & SIMARI, G. R. (2004). Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 4(1+2), 95-138. doi:10.1017/s1471068403001674Gunawardana, A., & Shani, G. (2015). Evaluating Recommender Systems. Recommender Systems Handbook, 265-308. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_8Heras, S., Botti, V., & Julián, V. (2012). Argument-based agreements in agent societies. Neurocomputing, 75(1), 156-162. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2011.02.022Heras, S., Rebollo, M., & Julián, V. (s. f.). A Dialogue Game Protocol for Recommendation in Social Networks. Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems, 515-522. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87656-4_64P.A. Kirschner, S.J. Buckingham-Shum and C.S. Carr, Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.Klašnja-Milićević, A., Ivanović, M., & Nanopoulos, A. (2015). Recommender systems in e-learning environments: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. Artificial Intelligence Review, 44(4), 571-604. doi:10.1007/s10462-015-9440-zLearning Technology Standards Committee, IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 2002.Leite, W. L., Svinicki, M., & Shi, Y. (2009). Attempted Validation of the Scores of the VARK: Learning Styles Inventory With Multitrait–Multimethod Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(2), 323-339. doi:10.1177/0013164409344507Li, H., Oren, N., & Norman, T. J. (2012). Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1-16. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_1CACM Staff. (2009). Recommendation algorithms, online privacy, and more. Communications of the ACM, 52(5), 10-11. doi:10.1145/1506409.1506434Ossowski, S., Sierra, C., & Botti, V. (2012). Agreement Technologies: A Computing Perspective. Agreement Technologies, 3-16. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_1Palanca, J., Heras, S., Jorge, J., & Julian, V. (2015). Towards persuasive social recommendation. ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review, 15(2), 41-49. doi:10.1145/2815169.2815173Recio-García, J. A., Quijano, L., & Díaz-Agudo, B. (2013). Including social factors in an argumentative model for Group Decision Support Systems. Decision Support Systems, 56, 48-55. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.007Rodríguez, P., Duque, N., & Ovalle, D. A. (2015). Multi-agent System for Knowledge-Based Recommendation of Learning Objects Using Metadata Clustering. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 356-364. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19033-4_31Rodríguez, P. A., Ovalle, D. A., & Duque, N. D. (2015). A Student-Centered Hybrid Recommender System to Provide Relevant Learning Objects from Repositories. Learning and Collaboration Technologies, 291-300. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_28M. Salehi, M. Pourzaferani and S.A. Razavi, Hybrid attribute-based recommender system for learning material using genetic algorithm and a multidimensional information model, Egyptian Informatics Journal (2013).Sikka, R., Dhankhar, A., & Rana, C. (2012). A Survey Paper on E-Learning Recommender System. International Journal of Computer Applications, 47(9), 27-30. doi:10.5120/7218-0024Sinha, R., & Swearingen, K. (2002). The role of transparency in recommender systems. CHI ’02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’02. doi:10.1145/506443.506619Van de Sompel, H., Chute, R., & Hochstenbach, P. (2008). The aDORe federation architecture: digital repositories at scale. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 9(2), 83-100. doi:10.1007/s00799-008-0048-7Vekariya, V., & Kulkarni, G. R. (2012). Notice of Violation of IEEE Publication Principles - Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments. 2012 Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and it’s Applications (DICTAP). doi:10.1109/dictap.2012.621540

Argument-based generation and explanation of recommendations

In the recommender systems literature, it has been shown that, in addition to improving system effectiveness, explaining recommendations may increase user satisfaction, trust, persuasion and loyalty. In general, explanations focus on the filtering algorithms or the users and items involved in the generation of recommendations. However, on certain domains that are rich on user-generated textual content, it would be valuable to provide justifications of recommendations according to arguments that are explicit, underlying or related with the data used by the systems, e.g., the reasons for customers' opinions in reviews of e-commerce sites, and the requests and claims in citizens' proposals and debates of e-participation platforms. In this context, there is a need and challenging task to automatically extract and exploit the arguments given for and against evaluated items. We thus advocate to focus not only on user preferences and item features, but also on associated arguments. In other words, we propose to not only consider what is said about items, but also why it is said. Hence, arguments would not only be part of the recommendation explanations, but could also be used by the recommendation algorithms themselves. To this end, in this thesis, we propose to use argument mining techniques and tools that allow retrieving and relating argumentative information from textual content, and investigate recommendation methods that exploit that information before, during and after their filtering processesThe author thanks his supervisor Iván Cantador for his valuable support and guidance in defining this thesis project. The work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2019-108965GB-I00

Improving argumentation-based recommender systems through context-adaptable selection criteria

Recommender Systems based on argumentation represent an important proposal where the recommendation is supported by qualitative information. In these systems, the role of the comparison criterion used to decide between competing arguments is paramount and the possibility of using the most appropriate for a given domain becomes a central issue; therefore, an argumentative recommender system that offers an interchangeable argument comparison criterion provides a significant ability that can be exploited by the user. However, in most of current recommender systems, the argument comparison criterion is either fixed, or codified within the arguments. In this work we propose a formalization of context-adaptable selection criteria that enhances the argumentative reasoning mechanism. Thus, we do not propose of a new type of recommender system; instead we present a mechanism that expand the capabilities of existing argumentation-based recommender systems. More precisely, our proposal is to provide a way of specifying how to select and use the most appropriate argument comparison criterion effecting the selection on the user´s preferences, giving the possibility of programming, by the use of conditional expressions, which argument preference criterion has to be used in each particular situation.Fil: Teze, Juan Carlos Lionel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos; ArgentinaFil: Gottifredi, Sebastián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; ArgentinaFil: García, Alejandro Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; ArgentinaFil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentin

On the Extraction and Use of Arguments in Recommender Systems: A Case Study in the E-participation Domain

In this paper, we present ongoing work on the automatic extraction of arguments from textual content, and on the use of interconnected argument structures by recommender systems. Differently to the majority of existing argument mining methods –which only consider ‘premise’ and ‘claim’ as the components of an argument, and ‘support’ and ‘attack’ as the possible relations between argument components–, we propose an argumentation model based on a detailed taxonomy of argumentative relations. Moreover, we provide a lexicon of English and Spanish linguistic connectors categorized in our taxonomy. As a proof of concept, we apply a simple, yet effective method that makes use of the built taxonomy and lexicon to extract argument graphs from citizen proposals and debates of an e-participation platform. We then describe how the extracted graphs could be exploited to generate and explain argument-based recommendationsThis work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2019-108965GB-I00

Recommender system based on argumentation by analogy

Argumentation has contributed to the formalization of a reasoning model, similar to the human reasoning. In general, argumentation can be associated with the interaction of reasons in favour and against certain conclusions, so as to determine what conclusions are acceptable. A way of arguing in which the way in which the arguments are constructed, is Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP); this is a formalism that combines logic programming and defeasible argumentation. This work focuses on the strengthening of the reasoning process, identifying partial connections or determinations between knowledge pieces. Through these relations, it is possible to increase the justi cations and foundations that support a particular recommendation, by an analogy process.XV Workshop de Agentes y Sistemas InteligentesRed de Universidades con Carreras de Informática (RedUNCI

Peer recommendation based on comments write on social networks

Social networks and virtual communities has become a popular communication tool among Internet users. Millions of users share publications about different aspects: educational, personal, cultural, etc. Therefore these social sites are rich sources of information about who can help us solve any problems. In this paper, we focus on using the written comments to recommend a person who can answer a request. An automatic analysis of information using text mining techniques was proposed to select the most suitable users. Experimental evaluations show that the proposed techniques are efficient and perform better than a standard search.Eje: XV Workshop de Agentes y Sistemas InteligentesRed de Universidades con Carreras de Informática (RedUNCI

Peer recommendation based on comments write on social networks

Social networks and virtual communities has become a popular communication tool among Internet users. Millions of users share publications about different aspects: educational, personal, cultural, etc. Therefore these social sites are rich sources of information about who can help us solve any problems. In this paper, we focus on using the written comments to recommend a person who can answer a request. An automatic analysis of information using text mining techniques was proposed to select the most suitable users. Experimental evaluations show that the proposed techniques are efficient and perform better than a standard search.Eje: XV Workshop de Agentes y Sistemas InteligentesRed de Universidades con Carreras de Informática (RedUNCI