Better Approximation Bounds for the Joint Replenishment Problem

The Joint Replenishment Problem (JRP) deals with optimizing shipments of goods from a supplier to retailers through a shared warehouse. Each shipment involves transporting goods from the supplier to the warehouse, at a fixed cost C, followed by a redistribution of these goods from the warehouse to the retailers that ordered them, where transporting goods to a retailer $\rho$ has a fixed cost $c_\rho$. In addition, retailers incur waiting costs for each order. The objective is to minimize the overall cost of satisfying all orders, namely the sum of all shipping and waiting costs. JRP has been well studied in Operations Research and, more recently, in the area of approximation algorithms. For arbitrary waiting cost functions, the best known approximation ratio is 1.8. This ratio can be reduced to 1.574 for the JRP-D model, where there is no cost for waiting but orders have deadlines. As for hardness results, it is known that the problem is APX-hard and that the natural linear program for JRP has integrality gap at least 1.245. Both results hold even for JRP-D. In the online scenario, the best lower and upper bounds on the competitive ratio are 2.64 and 3, respectively. The lower bound of 2.64 applies even to the restricted version of JRP, denoted JRP-L, where the waiting cost function is linear. We provide several new approximation results for JRP. In the offline case, we give an algorithm with ratio 1.791, breaking the barrier of 1.8. In the online case, we show a lower bound of 2.754 on the competitive ratio for JRP-L (and thus JRP as well), improving the previous bound of 2.64. We also study the online version of JRP-D, for which we prove that the optimal competitive ratio is 2

Online Facility Location with Linear Delay

In the problem of online facility location with delay, a sequence of n clients appear in the metric space, and they need to be eventually connected to some open facility. The clients do not have to be connected immediately, but such a choice comes with a certain penalty: each client incurs a waiting cost (equal to the difference between its arrival and its connection time). At any point in time, an algorithm may decide to open a facility and connect any subset of clients to it. That is, an algorithm needs to balance three types of costs: cost of opening facilities, costs of connecting clients, and the waiting costs of clients. We study a natural variant of this problem, where clients may be connected also to an already open facility, but such action incurs an extra cost: an algorithm pays for waiting of the facility (a cost incurred separately for each such "late" connection). This is reminiscent of online matching with delays, where both sides of the connection incur a waiting cost. We call this variant two-sided delay to differentiate it from the previously studied one-sided delay, where clients may connect to a facility only at its opening time. We present an O(1)-competitive deterministic algorithm for the two-sided delay variant. Our approach is an extension of the approach used by Jain, Mahdian and Saberi [STOC 2002] for analyzing the performance of offline algorithms for facility location. To this end, we substantially simplify the part of the original argument in which a bound on the sequence of factor-revealing LPs is derived. We then show how to transform our O(1)-competitive algorithm for the two-sided delay variant to O(log n / log log n)-competitive deterministic algorithm for one-sided delays. This improves the known O(log n) bound by Azar and Touitou [FOCS 2020]. We note that all previous online algorithms for problems with delays in general metrics have at least logarithmic ratios