85,318 research outputs found
Approximability of Connected Factors
Finding a d-regular spanning subgraph (or d-factor) of a graph is easy by
Tutte's reduction to the matching problem. By the same reduction, it is easy to
find a minimal or maximal d-factor of a graph. However, if we require that the
d-factor is connected, these problems become NP-hard - finding a minimal
connected 2-factor is just the traveling salesman problem (TSP).
Given a complete graph with edge weights that satisfy the triangle
inequality, we consider the problem of finding a minimal connected -factor.
We give a 3-approximation for all and improve this to an
(r+1)-approximation for even d, where r is the approximation ratio of the TSP.
This yields a 2.5-approximation for even d. The same algorithm yields an
(r+1)-approximation for the directed version of the problem, where r is the
approximation ratio of the asymmetric TSP. We also show that none of these
minimization problems can be approximated better than the corresponding TSP.
Finally, for the decision problem of deciding whether a given graph contains
a connected d-factor, we extend known hardness results.Comment: To appear in the proceedings of WAOA 201
Lossy Kernelization
In this paper we propose a new framework for analyzing the performance of
preprocessing algorithms. Our framework builds on the notion of kernelization
from parameterized complexity. However, as opposed to the original notion of
kernelization, our definitions combine well with approximation algorithms and
heuristics. The key new definition is that of a polynomial size
-approximate kernel. Loosely speaking, a polynomial size
-approximate kernel is a polynomial time pre-processing algorithm that
takes as input an instance to a parameterized problem, and outputs
another instance to the same problem, such that . Additionally, for every , a -approximate solution
to the pre-processed instance can be turned in polynomial time into a
-approximate solution to the original instance .
Our main technical contribution are -approximate kernels of
polynomial size for three problems, namely Connected Vertex Cover, Disjoint
Cycle Packing and Disjoint Factors. These problems are known not to admit any
polynomial size kernels unless . Our approximate
kernels simultaneously beat both the lower bounds on the (normal) kernel size,
and the hardness of approximation lower bounds for all three problems. On the
negative side we prove that Longest Path parameterized by the length of the
path and Set Cover parameterized by the universe size do not admit even an
-approximate kernel of polynomial size, for any , unless
. In order to prove this lower bound we need to combine
in a non-trivial way the techniques used for showing kernelization lower bounds
with the methods for showing hardness of approximationComment: 58 pages. Version 2 contain new results: PSAKS for Cycle Packing and
approximate kernel lower bounds for Set Cover and Hitting Set parameterized
by universe siz
Minimum-weight Cycle Covers and Their Approximability
A cycle cover of a graph is a set of cycles such that every vertex is part of
exactly one cycle. An L-cycle cover is a cycle cover in which the length of
every cycle is in the set L.
We investigate how well L-cycle covers of minimum weight can be approximated.
For undirected graphs, we devise a polynomial-time approximation algorithm that
achieves a constant approximation ratio for all sets L. On the other hand, we
prove that the problem cannot be approximated within a factor of 2-eps for
certain sets L.
For directed graphs, we present a polynomial-time approximation algorithm
that achieves an approximation ratio of O(n), where is the number of
vertices. This is asymptotically optimal: We show that the problem cannot be
approximated within a factor of o(n).
To contrast the results for cycle covers of minimum weight, we show that the
problem of computing L-cycle covers of maximum weight can, at least in
principle, be approximated arbitrarily well.Comment: To appear in the Proceedings of the 33rd Workshop on Graph-Theoretic
Concepts in Computer Science (WG 2007). Minor change
Fast Distributed Approximation for Max-Cut
Finding a maximum cut is a fundamental task in many computational settings.
Surprisingly, it has been insufficiently studied in the classic distributed
settings, where vertices communicate by synchronously sending messages to their
neighbors according to the underlying graph, known as the or
models. We amend this by obtaining almost optimal
algorithms for Max-Cut on a wide class of graphs in these models. In
particular, for any , we develop randomized approximation
algorithms achieving a ratio of to the optimum for Max-Cut on
bipartite graphs in the model, and on general graphs in the
model.
We further present efficient deterministic algorithms, including a
-approximation for Max-Dicut in our models, thus improving the best known
(randomized) ratio of . Our algorithms make non-trivial use of the greedy
approach of Buchbinder et al. (SIAM Journal on Computing, 2015) for maximizing
an unconstrained (non-monotone) submodular function, which may be of
independent interest
Network Design with Coverage Costs
We study network design with a cost structure motivated by redundancy in data
traffic. We are given a graph, g groups of terminals, and a universe of data
packets. Each group of terminals desires a subset of the packets from its
respective source. The cost of routing traffic on any edge in the network is
proportional to the total size of the distinct packets that the edge carries.
Our goal is to find a minimum cost routing. We focus on two settings. In the
first, the collection of packet sets desired by source-sink pairs is laminar.
For this setting, we present a primal-dual based 2-approximation, improving
upon a logarithmic approximation due to Barman and Chawla (2012). In the second
setting, packet sets can have non-trivial intersection. We focus on the case
where each packet is desired by either a single terminal group or by all of the
groups, and the graph is unweighted. For this setting we present an O(log
g)-approximation.
Our approximation for the second setting is based on a novel spanner-type
construction in unweighted graphs that, given a collection of g vertex subsets,
finds a subgraph of cost only a constant factor more than the minimum spanning
tree of the graph, such that every subset in the collection has a Steiner tree
in the subgraph of cost at most O(log g) that of its minimum Steiner tree in
the original graph. We call such a subgraph a group spanner.Comment: Updated version with additional result
- …