Approximation for Scheduling on Parallel Machines with Fixed Jobs or Unavailability Periods

We survey results that address the problem of non-preemptive scheduling on parallel machines with fixed jobs or unavailability periods with the purpose of minimizing the maximum completion time. We consider both identical and uniform processors, and also address the special case of scheduling on nonsimultaneous parallel machines, which may start processing at different times. The discussed results include polynomial-time approximation algorithms that achieve the best possible worst-case approximation bound of 1.5 in the class of polynomial algorithms unless P = NP for scheduling on identical processors with at most one fixed job on each machine and on uniform machines with at most one fixed job on each machine. The presented heuristics have similarities with the LPT algorithm or the MULTIFIT algorithm and they are fast and easy to implement. For scheduling on nonsimultaneous machines, experiments suggest that they would perform well in practice. We also include references to the relevant work in this area that contains more complex algorithms. We then discuss the main methods of argument used in the approximation bound proofs for the simple heuristics, and comment upon current challenges in this area by describing aspects of related practical problems from the automotive industry

Machine Scheduling with Resource Dependent Processing Times

We consider several parallel machine scheduling settings with the objective to minimize the schedule makespan. The most general of these settings is unrelated parallel machine scheduling. We assume that, in addition to its machine dependence, the processing time of any job is dependent on the usage of a scarce renewable resource. A given amount of that resource, e.g. workers, can be distributed over the jobs in process at any time, and the more of that resource is allocated to a job, the smaller is its processing time. This model generalizes classical machine scheduling problems, adding a time-resource tradeoff. It is also a natural variant of a generalized assignment problem studied previously by Shmoys and Tardos. On the basis of integer programming formulations for relaxations of the respective problems, we use LP rounding techniques to allocate resources to jobs, and to assign jobs to machines. Combined with Graham''s list scheduling, we thus prove the existence of constant factor approximation algorithms. Our performance guarantee is 6.83 for the most general case of unrelated parallel machine scheduling. We improve this bound for two special cases, namely to 5.83 whenever the jobs are assigned to machines beforehand, and to (5+e), e>0, whenever the processing times do not depend on the machine. Moreover, we discuss tightness of the relaxations, and derive inapproximability results.operations research and management science;

Sublinear Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Precedence Graphs of Bounded Depth

We study the classical scheduling problem on parallel machines %with precedence constraints where the precedence graph has the bounded depth h. Our goal is to minimize the maximum completion time. We focus on developing approximation algorithms that use only sublinear space or sublinear time. We develop the first one-pass streaming approximation schemes using sublinear space when all jobs\u27 processing times differ no more than a constant factor c and the number of machines m is at most 2nϵ3hc. This is so far the best approximation we can have in terms of m, since no polynomial time approximation better than 43 exists when m=n3 unless P=NP. %the problem cannot be approximated within a factor of 43 when m=n3 even if all jobs have equal processing time. The algorithms are then extended to the more general problem where the largest αn jobs have no more than c factor difference. % for some constant

Scheduling under Linear Constraints

We introduce a parallel machine scheduling problem in which the processing times of jobs are not given in advance but are determined by a system of linear constraints. The objective is to minimize the makespan, i.e., the maximum job completion time among all feasible choices. This novel problem is motivated by various real-world application scenarios. We discuss the computational complexity and algorithms for various settings of this problem. In particular, we show that if there is only one machine with an arbitrary number of linear constraints, or there is an arbitrary number of machines with no more than two linear constraints, or both the number of machines and the number of linear constraints are fixed constants, then the problem is polynomial-time solvable via solving a series of linear programming problems. If both the number of machines and the number of constraints are inputs of the problem instance, then the problem is NP-Hard. We further propose several approximation algorithms for the latter case.Comment: 21 page

Approximation Algorithms for Problems in Makespan Minimization on Unrelated Parallel Machines

A fundamental problem in scheduling is makespan minimization on unrelated parallel machines (R||Cmax). Let there be a set J of jobs and a set M of parallel machines, where every job Jj ∈ J has processing time or length pi,j ∈ ℚ+ on machine Mi ∈ M. The goal in R||Cmax is to schedule the jobs non-preemptively on the machines so as to minimize the length of the schedule, the makespan. A ρ-approximation algorithm produces in polynomial time a feasible solution such that its objective value is within a multiplicative factor ρ of the optimum, where ρ is called its approximation ratio. The best-known approximation algorithms for R||Cmax have approximation ratio 2, but there is no ρ-approximation algorithm with ρ \u3c 3/2 for R||Cmax unless P=NP. A longstanding open problem in approximation algorithms is to reconcile this hardness gap. We take a two-pronged approach to learn more about the hardness gap of R||Cmax: (1) find approximation algorithms for special cases of R||Cmax whose approximation ratios are tight (unless P=NP); (2) identify special cases of R||Cmax that have the same 3/2-hardness bound of R||Cmax, but where the approximation barrier of 2 can be broken. This thesis is divided into four parts. The first two parts investigate a special case of R||Cmax called the graph balancing problem when every job has one of two lengths and the machines may have one of two speeds. First, we present 3/2-approximation algorithms for the graph balancing problem with one speed and two job lengths. In the second part of this thesis we give an approximation algorithm for the graph balancing problem with two speeds and two job lengths with approximation ratio (√65+7)/8 ≈ 1.88278. In the third part of the thesis we present approximation algorithms and hardness of approximation results for two problems called R||Cmax with simple job-intersection structure and R||Cmax with bounded job assignments. We conclude this thesis by presenting algorithmic and computational complexity results for a generalization of R||Cmax where J is partitioned into sets called bags, and it must be that no two jobs belonging to the same bag are scheduled on the same machine

Malleable Scheduling Beyond Identical Machines

In malleable job scheduling, jobs can be executed simultaneously on multiple machines with the processing time depending on the number of allocated machines. Jobs are required to be executed non-preemptively and in unison, in the sense that they occupy, during their execution, the same time interval over all the machines of the allocated set. In this work, we study generalizations of malleable job scheduling inspired by standard scheduling on unrelated machines. Specifically, we introduce a general model of malleable job scheduling, where each machine has a (possibly different) speed for each job, and the processing time of a job j on a set of allocated machines S depends on the total speed of S for j. For machines with unrelated speeds, we show that the optimal makespan cannot be approximated within a factor less than e/(e-1), unless P = NP. On the positive side, we present polynomial-time algorithms with approximation ratios 2e/(e-1) for machines with unrelated speeds, 3 for machines with uniform speeds, and 7/3 for restricted assignments on identical machines. Our algorithms are based on deterministic LP rounding and result in sparse schedules, in the sense that each machine shares at most one job with other machines. We also prove lower bounds on the integrality gap of 1+phi for unrelated speeds (phi is the golden ratio) and 2 for uniform speeds and restricted assignments. To indicate the generality of our approach, we show that it also yields constant factor approximation algorithms (i) for minimizing the sum of weighted completion times; and (ii) a variant where we determine the effective speed of a set of allocated machines based on the L_p norm of their speeds

Parameterized complexity of machine scheduling: 15 open problems

Machine scheduling problems are a long-time key domain of algorithms and complexity research. A novel approach to machine scheduling problems are fixed-parameter algorithms. To stimulate this thriving research direction, we propose 15 open questions in this area whose resolution we expect to lead to the discovery of new approaches and techniques both in scheduling and parameterized complexity theory.Comment: Version accepted to Computers & Operations Researc

Stochastic scheduling on unrelated machines

Two important characteristics encountered in many real-world scheduling problems are heterogeneous machines/processors and a certain degree of uncertainty about the actual sizes of jobs. The first characteristic entails machine dependent processing times of jobs and is captured by the classical unrelated machine scheduling model.The second characteristic is adequately addressed by stochastic processing times of jobs as they are studied in classical stochastic scheduling models. While there is an extensive but separate literature for the two scheduling models, we study for the first time a combined model that takes both characteristics into account simultaneously. Here, the processing time of job $j$ on machine $i$ is governed by random variable $P_{ij}$, and its actual realization becomes known only upon job completion. With $w_j$ being the given weight of job $j$, we study the classical objective to minimize the expected total weighted completion time $E[\sum_j w_jC_j]$, where $C_j$ is the completion time of job $j$. By means of a novel time-indexed linear programming relaxation, we compute in polynomial time a scheduling policy with performance guarantee $(3+\Delta)/2+\epsilon$. Here, $\epsilon>0$ is arbitrarily small, and $\Delta$ is an upper bound on the squared coefficient of variation of the processing times. We show that the dependence of the performance guarantee on $\Delta$ is tight, as we obtain a $\Delta/2$ lower bound for the type of policies that we use. When jobs also have individual release dates $r_{ij}$, our bound is $(2+\Delta)+\epsilon$. Via $\Delta=0$, currently best known bounds for deterministic scheduling are contained as a special case

Competitive-Ratio Approximation Schemes for Minimizing the Makespan in the Online-List Model

We consider online scheduling on multiple machines for jobs arriving one-by-one with the objective of minimizing the makespan. For any number of identical parallel or uniformly related machines, we provide a competitive-ratio approximation scheme that computes an online algorithm whose competitive ratio is arbitrarily close to the best possible competitive ratio. We also determine this value up to any desired accuracy. This is the first application of competitive-ratio approximation schemes in the online-list model. The result proves the applicability of the concept in different online models. We expect that it fosters further research on other online problems

Complexity and Inapproximability Results for Parallel Task Scheduling and Strip Packing

We study the Parallel Task Scheduling problem $Pm|size_j|C_{\max}$ with a constant number of machines. This problem is known to be strongly NP-complete for each $m \geq 5$, while it is solvable in pseudo-polynomial time for each $m \leq 3$. We give a positive answer to the long-standing open question whether this problem is strongly $NP$-complete for $m=4$. As a second result, we improve the lower bound of $\frac{12}{11}$ for approximating pseudo-polynomial Strip Packing to $\frac{5}{4}$. Since the best known approximation algorithm for this problem has a ratio of $\frac{4}{3} + \varepsilon$, this result narrows the gap between approximation ratio and inapproximability result by a significant step. Both results are proven by a reduction from the strongly $NP$-complete problem 3-Partition