Approximation Algorithms for Covering/Packing Integer Programs

Given matrices A and B and vectors a, b, c and d, all with non-negative entries, we consider the problem of computing min {c.x: x in Z^n_+, Ax > a, Bx < b, x < d}. We give a bicriteria-approximation algorithm that, given epsilon in (0, 1], finds a solution of cost O(ln(m)/epsilon^2) times optimal, meeting the covering constraints (Ax > a) and multiplicity constraints (x < d), and satisfying Bx < (1 + epsilon)b + beta, where beta is the vector of row sums beta_i = sum_j B_ij. Here m denotes the number of rows of A. This gives an O(ln m)-approximation algorithm for CIP -- minimum-cost covering integer programs with multiplicity constraints, i.e., the special case when there are no packing constraints Bx < b. The previous best approximation ratio has been O(ln(max_j sum_i A_ij)) since 1982. CIP contains the set cover problem as a special case, so O(ln m)-approximation is the best possible unless P=NP.Comment: Preliminary version appeared in IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (2001). To appear in Journal of Computer and System Science

Partial resampling to approximate covering integer programs

We consider column-sparse covering integer programs, a generalization of set cover, which have a long line of research of (randomized) approximation algorithms. We develop a new rounding scheme based on the Partial Resampling variant of the Lov\'{a}sz Local Lemma developed by Harris & Srinivasan (2019). This achieves an approximation ratio of $1 + \frac{\ln (\Delta_1+1)}{a_{\min}} + O\Big( \log(1 + \sqrt{ \frac{\log (\Delta_1+1)}{a_{\min}}} \Big)$, where $a_{\min}$ is the minimum covering constraint and $\Delta_1$ is the maximum $\ell_1$-norm of any column of the covering matrix (whose entries are scaled to lie in $[0,1]$). When there are additional constraints on the variable sizes, we show an approximation ratio of $\ln \Delta_0 + O(\log \log \Delta_0)$ (where $\Delta_0$ is the maximum number of non-zero entries in any column of the covering matrix). These results improve asymptotically, in several different ways, over results of Srinivasan (2006) and Kolliopoulos & Young (2005). We show nearly-matching inapproximability and integrality-gap lower bounds. We also show that the rounding process leads to negative correlation among the variables, which allows us to handle multi-criteria programs

The parallel approximability of a subclass of quadratic programming

In this paper we deal with the parallel approximability of a special class of Quadratic Programming (QP), called Smooth Positive Quadratic Programming. This subclass of QP is obtained by imposing restrictions on the coefficients of the QP instance. The Smoothness condition restricts the magnitudes of the coefficients while the positiveness requires that all the coefficients be non-negative. Interestingly, even with these restrictions several combinatorial problems can be modeled by Smooth QP. We show NC Approximation Schemes for the instances of Smooth Positive QP. This is done by reducing the instance of QP to an instance of Positive Linear Programming, finding in NC an approximate fractional solution to the obtained program, and then rounding the fractional solution to an integer approximate solution for the original problem. Then we show how to extend the result for positive instances of bounded degree to Smooth Integer Programming problems. Finally, we formulate several important combinatorial problems as Positive Quadratic Programs (or Positive Integer Programs) in packing/covering form and show that the techniques presented can be used to obtain NC Approximation Schemes for "dense" instances of such problems.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

Dynamic programming based algorithms for set multicover and multiset multicover problems

Given a universe N containing n elements and a collection of multisets or sets over N, the multiset multicover (MSMC) problem or the set multicover (SMC) problem is to cover all elements at least a number of times as specified in their coverage requirements with the minimum number of multisets or sets. In this paper, we give various exact algorithms for these two problems with or without constraints on the number of times a multiset or set may be chosen. First, we show that the MSMC without multiplicity constraints problem can be solved in O* ((b + 1)n | F |) time and polynomial space, where b is the maximum coverage requirement and | F | denotes the total number of given multisets over N. (The O* notation suppresses a factor polynomial in n.) To our knowledge, this is the first known exact algorithm for the MSMC without multiplicity constraints problem. Second, by combining dynamic programming and the inclusion-exclusion principle, we can exactly solve the SMC without multiplicity constraints problem in O ((b + 2)n) time. Compared with two recent results, in [Q.-S. Hua, Y. Wang, D. Yu, F.C.M. Lau, Set multi-covering via inclusion-exclusion, Theoretical Computer Science, 410 (38-40) (2009) 3882-3892] and [J. Nederlof, Inclusion exclusion for hard problems, Master Thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, 2008], respectively, ours is the fastest exact algorithm for the SMC without multiplicity constraints problem. Finally, by directly using dynamic programming, we give the first known exact algorithm for the MSMC or the SMC with multiplicity constraints problem in O ((b + 1)n | F |) time and O* ((b + 1)n) space. This algorithm can also be easily adapted as a constructive algorithm for the MSMC without multiplicity constraints problem. © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.postprin