78 research outputs found

    Global Cardinality Constraints Make Approximating Some Max-2-CSPs Harder

    Get PDF
    Assuming the Unique Games Conjecture, we show that existing approximation algorithms for some Boolean Max-2-CSPs with cardinality constraints are optimal. In particular, we prove that Max-Cut with cardinality constraints is UG-hard to approximate within ~~0.858, and that Max-2-Sat with cardinality constraints is UG-hard to approximate within ~~0.929. In both cases, the previous best hardness results were the same as the hardness of the corresponding unconstrained Max-2-CSP (~~0.878 for Max-Cut, and ~~0.940 for Max-2-Sat). The hardness for Max-2-Sat applies to monotone Max-2-Sat instances, meaning that we also obtain tight inapproximability for the Max-k-Vertex-Cover problem

    Faster SDP hierarchy solvers for local rounding algorithms

    Full text link
    Convex relaxations based on different hierarchies of linear/semi-definite programs have been used recently to devise approximation algorithms for various optimization problems. The approximation guarantee of these algorithms improves with the number of {\em rounds} rr in the hierarchy, though the complexity of solving (or even writing down the solution for) the rr'th level program grows as nΩ(r)n^{\Omega(r)} where nn is the input size. In this work, we observe that many of these algorithms are based on {\em local} rounding procedures that only use a small part of the SDP solution (of size nO(1)2O(r)n^{O(1)} 2^{O(r)} instead of nΩ(r)n^{\Omega(r)}). We give an algorithm to find the requisite portion in time polynomial in its size. The challenge in achieving this is that the required portion of the solution is not fixed a priori but depends on other parts of the solution, sometimes in a complicated iterative manner. Our solver leads to nO(1)2O(r)n^{O(1)} 2^{O(r)} time algorithms to obtain the same guarantees in many cases as the earlier nO(r)n^{O(r)} time algorithms based on rr rounds of the Lasserre hierarchy. In particular, guarantees based on O(logn)O(\log n) rounds can be realized in polynomial time. We develop and describe our algorithm in a fairly general abstract framework. The main technical tool in our work, which might be of independent interest in convex optimization, is an efficient ellipsoid algorithm based separation oracle for convex programs that can output a {\em certificate of infeasibility with restricted support}. This is used in a recursive manner to find a sequence of consistent points in nested convex bodies that "fools" local rounding algorithms.Comment: 30 pages, 8 figure

    New Dependencies of Hierarchies in Polynomial Optimization

    Full text link
    We compare four key hierarchies for solving Constrained Polynomial Optimization Problems (CPOP): Sum of Squares (SOS), Sum of Diagonally Dominant Polynomials (SDSOS), Sum of Nonnegative Circuits (SONC), and the Sherali Adams (SA) hierarchies. We prove a collection of dependencies among these hierarchies both for general CPOPs and for optimization problems on the Boolean hypercube. Key results include for the general case that the SONC and SOS hierarchy are polynomially incomparable, while SDSOS is contained in SONC. A direct consequence is the non-existence of a Putinar-like Positivstellensatz for SDSOS. On the Boolean hypercube, we show as a main result that Schm\"udgen-like versions of the hierarchies SDSOS*, SONC*, and SA* are polynomially equivalent. Moreover, we show that SA* is contained in any Schm\"udgen-like hierarchy that provides a O(n) degree bound.Comment: 26 pages, 4 figure

    A Birthday Repetition Theorem and Complexity of Approximating Dense CSPs

    Get PDF
    A (k×l)(k \times l)-birthday repetition Gk×l\mathcal{G}^{k \times l} of a two-prover game G\mathcal{G} is a game in which the two provers are sent random sets of questions from G\mathcal{G} of sizes kk and ll respectively. These two sets are sampled independently uniformly among all sets of questions of those particular sizes. We prove the following birthday repetition theorem: when G\mathcal{G} satisfies some mild conditions, val(Gk×l)val(\mathcal{G}^{k \times l}) decreases exponentially in Ω(kl/n)\Omega(kl/n) where nn is the total number of questions. Our result positively resolves an open question posted by Aaronson, Impagliazzo and Moshkovitz (CCC 2014). As an application of our birthday repetition theorem, we obtain new fine-grained hardness of approximation results for dense CSPs. Specifically, we establish a tight trade-off between running time and approximation ratio for dense CSPs by showing conditional lower bounds, integrality gaps and approximation algorithms. In particular, for any sufficiently large ii and for every k2k \geq 2, we show the following results: - We exhibit an O(q1/i)O(q^{1/i})-approximation algorithm for dense Max kk-CSPs with alphabet size qq via Ok(i)O_k(i)-level of Sherali-Adams relaxation. - Through our birthday repetition theorem, we obtain an integrality gap of q1/iq^{1/i} for Ω~k(i)\tilde\Omega_k(i)-level Lasserre relaxation for fully-dense Max kk-CSP. - Assuming that there is a constant ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 such that Max 3SAT cannot be approximated to within (1ϵ)(1-\epsilon) of the optimal in sub-exponential time, our birthday repetition theorem implies that any algorithm that approximates fully-dense Max kk-CSP to within a q1/iq^{1/i} factor takes (nq)Ω~k(i)(nq)^{\tilde \Omega_k(i)} time, almost tightly matching the algorithmic result based on Sherali-Adams relaxation.Comment: 45 page
    corecore