Applying Formal Methods to Networking: Theory, Techniques and Applications

Despite its great importance, modern network infrastructure is remarkable for the lack of rigor in its engineering. The Internet which began as a research experiment was never designed to handle the users and applications it hosts today. The lack of formalization of the Internet architecture meant limited abstractions and modularity, especially for the control and management planes, thus requiring for every new need a new protocol built from scratch. This led to an unwieldy ossified Internet architecture resistant to any attempts at formal verification, and an Internet culture where expediency and pragmatism are favored over formal correctness. Fortunately, recent work in the space of clean slate Internet design---especially, the software defined networking (SDN) paradigm---offers the Internet community another chance to develop the right kind of architecture and abstractions. This has also led to a great resurgence in interest of applying formal methods to specification, verification, and synthesis of networking protocols and applications. In this paper, we present a self-contained tutorial of the formidable amount of work that has been done in formal methods, and present a survey of its applications to networking.Comment: 30 pages, submitted to IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorial

Lessons learned in the application of formal methods to the design of a storm surge barrier control system

The Maeslantkering is a key flood defense infrastructural system in the Netherlands. This movable barrier protects the city and harbor of Rotterdam, without impacting ship traffic under normal circumstances. Its control system, which operates completely autonomously, must be guaranteed to work correctly even under extreme weather conditions, although it closes only sporadically. During its development in the 1990's, the formal methods Z and Spin were used to increase reliability. As the availability of industrial expert knowledge on these formal methods declines, maintaining the specifications defined back then has become cumbersome. In the quest for an alternative mathematically rigorous approach, this paper reports on an experience in applying supervisory control synthesis. This formal method was recently applied successfully to other types of infrastructural systems like waterway locks, bridges, and tunnels, with the purpose to ensure safe behavior by coordinating hardware components. Here, we show that it can also be used to coordinate several (controller) software systems. Additionally, we compare the lessons learned from the originally used formal methods and link Z to supervisory control synthesis

Proceedings of the First NASA Formal Methods Symposium

Topics covered include: Model Checking - My 27-Year Quest to Overcome the State Explosion Problem; Applying Formal Methods to NASA Projects: Transition from Research to Practice; TLA+: Whence, Wherefore, and Whither; Formal Methods Applications in Air Transportation; Theorem Proving in Intel Hardware Design; Building a Formal Model of a Human-Interactive System: Insights into the Integration of Formal Methods and Human Factors Engineering; Model Checking for Autonomic Systems Specified with ASSL; A Game-Theoretic Approach to Branching Time Abstract-Check-Refine Process; Software Model Checking Without Source Code; Generalized Abstract Symbolic Summaries; A Comparative Study of Randomized Constraint Solvers for Random-Symbolic Testing; Component-Oriented Behavior Extraction for Autonomic System Design; Automated Verification of Design Patterns with LePUS3; A Module Language for Typing by Contracts; From Goal-Oriented Requirements to Event-B Specifications; Introduction of Virtualization Technology to Multi-Process Model Checking; Comparing Techniques for Certified Static Analysis; Towards a Framework for Generating Tests to Satisfy Complex Code Coverage in Java Pathfinder; jFuzz: A Concolic Whitebox Fuzzer for Java; Machine-Checkable Timed CSP; Stochastic Formal Correctness of Numerical Algorithms; Deductive Verification of Cryptographic Software; Coloured Petri Net Refinement Specification and Correctness Proof with Coq; Modeling Guidelines for Code Generation in the Railway Signaling Context; Tactical Synthesis Of Efficient Global Search Algorithms; Towards Co-Engineering Communicating Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems; and Formal Methods for Automated Diagnosis of Autosub 6000

Насколько формальны формальные методы?

В статье анализируются проблемы, связанные с развитием и внедрением формальных методов при разработке и верификации программного обеспечения и компьютерных систем. Дается классификация инвариантов. Уточняются понятие и процедура синтеза системы инвариантов и ее оптимизации по некоторым критериям. Предлагаются модели жизненного цикла программного обеспечения при использовании формальных методов Event-B и Model Checking. Анализируются их особенности и ограничения. Формулируются направления дальнейших исследований в этой области.У статті аналізуються проблеми, пов'язані з розвитком та застосуванням формальних методів під час створення й верифікації програмного забезпечення та комп'ютерних систем. Дається класифікація інваріантів. Уточнюються поняття й процедура синтезу системи інваріантів та її оптимізація за певними критеріями. Розглянуто моделі життєвого циклу за умов використання формальних методів Event-B та Model Checking, їх особливості та обмеження. Сформульовано напрямки подальших досліджень у цій області.The paper analyses existing problems associated with the development and practical application of formal methods in the design and verification of software and computer systems. The classification of invariants is given in the paper. We specify a concept of the system of invariants and discuss a procedure of its synthesis and optimization. The changes in the software life cycle caused by applying formal methods Event-B and Model Checking are discussed. The directions of further research in this area are also given

Path-Based Program Repair

We propose a path-based approach to program repair for imperative programs. Our repair framework takes as input a faulty program, a logic specification that is refuted, and a hint where the fault may be located. An iterative abstraction refinement loop is then used to repair the program: in each iteration, the faulty program part is re-synthesized considering a symbolic counterexample, where the control-flow is kept concrete but the data-flow is symbolic. The appeal of the idea is two-fold: 1) the approach lazily considers candidate repairs and 2) the repairs are directly derived from the logic specification. In contrast to prior work, our approach is complete for programs with finitely many control-flow paths, i.e., the program is repaired if and only if it can be repaired at the specified fault location. Initial results for small programs indicate that the approach is useful for debugging programs in practice.Comment: In Proceedings FESCA 2015, arXiv:1503.0437

Controllability in partial and uncertain environments

© 2014 IEEE.Controller synthesis is a well studied problem that attempts to automatically generate an operational behaviour model of the system-to-be that satisfies a given goal when deployed in a given domain model that behaves according to specified assumptions. A limitation of many controller synthesis techniques is that they require complete descriptions of the problem domain. This is limiting in the context of modern incremental development processes when a fully described problem domain is unavailable, undesirable or uneconomical. Previous work on Modal Transition Systems (MTS) control problems exists, however it is restricted to deterministic MTSs and deterministic Labelled Transition Systems (LTS) implementations. In this paper we study the Modal Transition System Control Problem in its full generality, allowing for nondeterministic MTSs modelling the environments behaviour and nondeterministic LTS implementations. Given an nondeterministic MTS we ask if all, none or some of the nondeterministic LTSs it describes admit an LTS controller that guarantees a given property. We show a technique that solves effectively the MTS realisability problem and it can be, in some cases, reduced to deterministic control problems. In all cases the MTS realisability problem is in same complexity class as the corresponding LTS problem