19 research outputs found
Computer Graphics. Volume 2 - an Annotated Bibliography to the NASA-MSFC Digital Computer Graphics Program
Annotated bibliography on digital computer graphic
ΠΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π° Π°Π½Π³Π»ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠ΅ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π€ΠΠΠ‘ Π΄Π½Π΅Π²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
Prokopyuk Olga Vasilievna; Shpudeyko Lyudmila Nikolaevna. English 4 IT. Manual on the development of the main types of speech activity in English for students of the specialties of FEIS full-time and evening forms of educationΠΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΡΡΠ° ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ:
"ΠΡΡΠΈΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ½Ρ, ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ" (1-40 02 01),
"ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ" (1-53 01 02),
"ΠΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡ" (1-40 03 01),
"ΠΡΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°" (1-36 04 02) (Π΄Π½Π΅Π²Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈ Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π΅Π΅ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅),
"ΠΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ" (1-39 03 02),
"ΠΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΉ" (1-40 01 01).
ΠΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π² ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΡ Β«ΠΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ
/ Π°Π½Π³Π»ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΠΉΒ» Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π΄Π½Π΅Π²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ.
Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΡΠΌΠ°, ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π°Π²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π½Π³Π»ΠΎΡΠ·ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ
Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ°ΠΌ ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ,
ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π°Π²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π°, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ Π² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Ρ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ. Π’Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π» Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ ΠΈΠ· Π·Π°ΡΡΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ², Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°
ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Ρ
Assessing the impact of computer use on landscape architecture professional practice: efficiency, effectiveness, and design creativity
Landscape architects claim that computers are efficient and effective presentation tools.
However, to date, no one has evaluated the impact of computer use on the nature and
quality of design in a practice setting. To further explore this issue, a trial was
conducted with landscape architecture students in which they worked in conventional,
mixed and digital media. Results indicated that although computer use was efficient in
some tasks, the nature of the design process did not yield itself effectively yet to
complete computerization. In addition, to assess the impact of computer use more
broadly on office practice today, a survey was conducted of over 100 Chapter Executive
Members of the American Society of Landscape Architects in the United States of
America.Survey results indicated that computer use has permeated all areas of landscape
architecture practice, and that it has genuinely improved drawing quality and capability.
However, it has not significantly impacted the artistic or creative aspects. Few
respondents believed the computer can improve these facets of the profession or that
traditional practice methods will be totally replaced by the computer.The results suggest that academic and professional sectors of landscape architecture
must help educate existing professionals to fully grasp the benefits of current and
emerging computer technologies and to prepare the future professionals for an
increasingly digital practice
2018 - The Twenty-third Annual Symposium of Student Scholars
The full program book from the Twenty-third Annual Symposium of Student Scholars, held on April 19, 2018. Includes abstracts from the presentations and posters.https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/sssprograms/1020/thumbnail.jp
NASA Tech Briefs, July 1993
Topics include: Data Acquisition and Analysis: Electronic Components and Circuits; Electronic Systems; Physical Sciences; Materials; Computer Programs; Mechanics; Machinery; Fabrication Technology; Mathematics and Information Sciences; Life Sciences
Purposive variation in recordkeeping in the academic molecular biology laboratory
This thesis presents an investigation into the role played by laboratory records in the disciplinary discourse of academic molecular biology laboratories.
The motivation behind this study stems from two areas of concern. Firstly, the laboratory record has received comparatively little attention as a linguistic genre in spite of its central role in the daily work of laboratory scientists. Secondly, laboratory records have become a focus for technologically driven change through the advent of computing systems that aim to support a transition away from the traditional paper-based approach towards electronic recordkeeping. Electronic recordkeeping raises the potential for increased sharing of laboratory records across laboratory communities. However, the uptake of electronic laboratory notebooks has been, and remains, markedly low in academic laboratories.
The investigation employs a multi-perspective research framework combining ethnography, genre analysis, and reading protocol analysis in order to evaluate both the organizational practices and linguistic practices at work in laboratory recordkeeping, and to examine these practices from the viewpoints of both producers and consumers of laboratory records. Particular emphasis is placed on assessing variation in the practices used by different scientists when keeping laboratory records, and on assessing the types of articulation work used to achieve mutual intelligibility across laboratory members.
The findings of this investigation indicate that the dominant viewpoint held by laboratory staff other than principal investigators conceptualized laboratory records as a personal resource rather than a community archive. Readers other than the original author relied almost exclusively on the recontextualization of selected information from laboratory records into βpublic genresβ such as laboratory talks, research articles, and progress reports as the preferred means of accessing the information held in the records. The consistent use of summarized forms of recording experimental data rendered most laboratory records as both unreliable and of limited usability in the records management sense that they did not form full and accurate descriptions that could support future organizational activities.
These findings offer a counterpoint to other studies, notably a number of studies undertaken as part of technology developments for electronic recordkeeping, that report sharing of laboratory records or assume a βcyberbolicβ view of laboratory records as a shared resource