17 research outputs found
Applicability of Weyuker’s Properties on OO Metrics: Some Misunderstandings
Weyuker’s properties have been suggested as a guiding tool
in identification of a good and comprehensive complexity measure by several researchers. Weyuker proposed nine properties to evaluate complexity measure for traditional programming. However, they are extensively used for evaluating object-oriented (OO) metrics, although the object-oriented features are entirely different in nature. In this paper, two recently reported OO metrics were evaluated and, based on it; the usefulness and relevance of these properties for evaluation purpose for object-oriented systems is discussed
Document Type De�nition (DTD) Metrics
In this paper, we present two complexity metrics for the assessment of schema quality written in Document Type De�finition (DTD) language. Both "Entropy (E) metric: E(DTD)" and "Distinct Structured Element Repetition Scale (DSERS) metric: DSERS(DTD)" are intended to measure the structural complexity of schemas in DTD language. These metrics exploit a directed graph representation of schema document and consider the complexity of schema due to its similar structured elements and the occurrences of these
elements. The empirical and theoretical validations of these metrics prove the robustness of the metrics
Entropy as a Measure of Quality of XML Schema Document
In this paper, a metric for the assessment of the structural complexity of eXtensible Markup Language schema
document is formulated. The present metric ‘Schema Entropy is based on entropy concept and intended to measure the
complexity of the schema documents written in W3C XML Schema Language due to diversity in the structures of its elements. The SE is useful in evaluating the efficiency of the design of Schemas. A good design reduces the maintainability efforts. Therefore, our metric provides valuable information about the reliability and maintainability of systems. In this respect, this
metric is believed to be a valuable contribution for improving the quality of XML-based systems. It is demonstrated with examples and validated empirically through actual test cases
An Empirical investigation into metrics for object-oriented software
Object-Oriented methods have increased in popularity over the last decade, and are now the norm for software development in many application areas. Many claims were made for the superiority of object-oriented methods over more traditional methods, and these claims have largely been accepted, or at least not questioned by the software community. Such was the motivation for this thesis. One way of capturing information about software is the use of software metrics. However, if we are to have faith in the information, we must be satisfied that these metrics do indeed tell us what we need to know. This is not easy when
the software characteristics we are interested in are intangible and unable to be precisely defined. This thesis considers the attempts to measure software and to make predictions regarding maintainabilty and effort over the last three decades. It examines traditional software
metrics and considers their failings in the light of the calls for better standards of validation in terms of measurement theory and empirical study. From this five lessons were derived. The relatively new area of metrics for object-oriented systems is examined to determine whether suggestions for improvement have been widely heeded.
The thesis uses an industrial case study and an experiment to examine one feature of objectorientation, inheritance, and its effect on aspects of maintainability, namely number of defects and time to implement a change. The case study is also used to demonstrate that it is possible to obtain early, simple and useful local prediction systems for important attributes such as system size and defects, using readily available measures rather than attempting predefined and possibly time consuming metrics which may suffer from poor definition, invalidity or inability to predict or capture anything of real use. The thesis concludes that there is empirical evidence to suggest a hypothesis linking inheritance and increased incidence of defects and increased maintenance effort and that more empirical studies are needed in order to test the hypothesis. This suggests that we should treat claims regarding the benefits of object-orientation for maintenance with some caution. This thesis also concludes that with the ability to produce, with little effort,
accurate local metrics, we have an acceptable substitute for the large predefined metrics suites with their attendant problems
Quality modelling and metrics of Web-based information systems
In recent years, the World Wide Web has become a major platform for software
applications. Web-based information systems have been involved in many areas of
our everyday life, such as education, entertainment, business, manufacturing,
communication, etc. As web-based systems are usually distributed, multimedia,
interactive and cooperative, and their production processes usually follow ad-hoc
approaches, the quality of web-based systems has become a major concern.
Existing quality models and metrics do not fully satisfy the needs of quality
management of Web-based systems. This study has applied and adapted software
quality engineering methods and principles to address the following issues, a quality
modeling method for derivation of quality models of Web-based information systems;
and the development, implementation and validation of quality metrics of key quality
attributes of Web-based information systems, which include navigability and
timeliness.
The quality modeling method proposed in this study has the following strengths. It is
more objective and rigorous than existing approaches. The quality analysis can be
conducted in the early stage of system life cycle on the design. It is easy to use and
can provide insight into the improvement of the design of systems. Results of case
studies demonstrated that the quality modeling method is applicable and practical.
Practitioners can use the modeling method to develop their own quality models.
This study is amongst the first comprehensive attempts to develop quality
measurement for Web-based information systems. First, it identified the relationship
between website structural complexity and navigability. Quality metrics of
navigability were defined, investigated and implemented. Empirical studies were
conducted to evaluate the metrics. Second, this study investigated website timeliness
and attempted to find direct and indirect measures for the quality attribute. Empirical
studies for validating such metrics were also conducted.
This study also suggests four areas of future research that may be fruitful
Software Engineering Laboratory Series: Collected Software Engineering Papers
The Software Engineering Laboratory (SEL) is an organization sponsored by NASA/GSFC and created to investigate the effectiveness of software engineering technologies when applied to the development of application software. The activities, findings, and recommendations of the SEL are recorded in the Software Engineering Laboratory Series, a continuing series of reports that includes this document
IDENTIFICATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF VARIABILITY MEASURES AFFECTING CODE REUSABILITY IN OPEN SOURCE ENVIRONMENT
Open source software (OSS) is one of the emerging areas in software engineering, and
is gaining the interest of the software development community. OSS was started as a
movement, and for many years software developers contributed to it as their hobby
(non commercial purpose). Now, OSS components are being reused in CBSD
(commercial purpose). However, recently, the use of OSS in SPL is envisioned
recently by software engineering researchers, thus bringing it into a new arena. Being
an emerging research area, it demands exploratory study to explore the dimensions of
this phenomenon. Furthermore, there is a need to assess the reusability of OSS which
is the focal point of these disciplines (CBSE, SPL, and OSS). In this research, a mixed
method based approach is employed which is specifically 'partially mixed sequential
dominant study'. It involves both qualitative (interviews) and quantitative phases
(survey and experiment). During the qualitative phase seven respondents were
involved, sample size of survey was 396, and three experiments were conducted. The
main contribution of this study is results of exploration of the phenomenon 'reuse of
OSS in reuse intensive software development'. The findings include 7 categories and
39 dimensions. One of the dimension factors affecting reusability was carried to the
quantitative phase (survey and experiment). On basis of the findings, proposal for
reusability attribute model was presented at class and package level. Variability is one
of the newly identified attribute of reusability. A comprehensive theoretical analysis
of variability implementation mechanisms is conducted to propose metrics for its
assessment. The reusability attribute model is validated by statistical analysis of I 03
classes and 77 packages. An evolutionary reusability analysis of two open source
software was conducted, where different versions of software are analyzed for their
reusability. The results show a positive correlation between variability and reusability
at package level and validate the other identified attributes. The results would be
helpful to conduct further studies in this area
IDENTIFICATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF VARIABILITY MEASURES AFFECTING CODE REUSABILITY IN OPEN SOURCE ENVIRONMENT
Open source software (OSS) is one of the emerging areas in software engineering, and
is gaining the interest of the software development community. OSS was started as a
movement, and for many years software developers contributed to it as their hobby
(non commercial purpose). Now, OSS components are being reused in CBSD
(commercial purpose). However, recently, the use of OSS in SPL is envisioned
recently by software engineering researchers, thus bringing it into a new arena. Being
an emerging research area, it demands exploratory study to explore the dimensions of
this phenomenon. Furthermore, there is a need to assess the reusability of OSS which
is the focal point of these disciplines (CBSE, SPL, and OSS). In this research, a mixed
method based approach is employed which is specifically 'partially mixed sequential
dominant study'. It involves both qualitative (interviews) and quantitative phases
(survey and experiment). During the qualitative phase seven respondents were
involved, sample size of survey was 396, and three experiments were conducted. The
main contribution of this study is results of exploration of the phenomenon 'reuse of
OSS in reuse intensive software development'. The findings include 7 categories and
39 dimensions. One of the dimension factors affecting reusability was carried to the
quantitative phase (survey and experiment). On basis of the findings, proposal for
reusability attribute model was presented at class and package level. Variability is one
of the newly identified attribute of reusability. A comprehensive theoretical analysis
of variability implementation mechanisms is conducted to propose metrics for its
assessment. The reusability attribute model is validated by statistical analysis of I 03
classes and 77 packages. An evolutionary reusability analysis of two open source
software was conducted, where different versions of software are analyzed for their
reusability. The results show a positive correlation between variability and reusability
at package level and validate the other identified attributes. The results would be
helpful to conduct further studies in this area
Software Engineering Laboratory Series: Collected Software Engineering Papers
The Software Engineering Laboratory (SEL) is an organization sponsored by NASA/GSFC and created to investigate the effectiveness of software engineering technologies when applied to the development of application software. The activities, findings, and recommendations of the SEL are recorded in the Software Engineering Laboratory Series, a continuing series of reports that includes this document
Recommended from our members
System architecture metrics: an evaluation
The research described in this dissertation is a study of the application of measurement, or metrics for software engineering. This is not in itself a new idea; the concept of measuring software was first mooted close on twenty years ago. However, examination of what is a considerable body of metrics work, reveals that incorporating measurement into software engineering is rather less straightforward than one might pre-suppose and despite the advancing years, there is still a lack of maturity.
The thesis commences with a dissection of three of the most popular metrics, namely Haistead's software science, McCabe's cyclomatic complexity and Henry and Kafura's information flow - all of which might be regarded as having achieved classic status. Despite their popularity these metrics are all flawed in at least three respects. First and foremost, in each case it is unclear exactly what is being measured: instead there being a preponderance of such metaphysical terms as complexIty and qualIty. Second, each metric is theoretically doubtful in that it exhibits anomalous behaviour. Third, much of the claimed empirical support for each metric is spurious arising from poor experimental design, and inappropriate statistical analysis. It is argued that these problems are not misfortune but the inevitable consequence of the ad hoc and unstructured approach of much metrics research: in particular the scant regard paid to the role of underlying models.
This research seeks to address these problems by proposing a systematic method for the development and evaluation of software metrics. The method is a goal directed, combination of formal modelling techniques, and empirical ealiat%or. The met\io s applied to the problem of developing metrics to evaluate software designs - from the perspective of a software engineer wishing to minimise implementation difficulties, faults and future maintenance problems. It highlights a number of weaknesses within the original model. These are tackled in a second, more sophisticated model which is multidimensional, that is it combines, in this case, two metrics. Both the theoretical and empirical analysis show this model to have utility in its ability to identify hardto- implement and unreliable aspects of software designs. It is concluded that this method goes some way towards the problem of introducing a little more rigour into the development, evaluation and evolution of metrics for the software engineer