1,612 research outputs found
Short proofs of some extremal results
We prove several results from different areas of extremal combinatorics,
giving complete or partial solutions to a number of open problems. These
results, coming from areas such as extremal graph theory, Ramsey theory and
additive combinatorics, have been collected together because in each case the
relevant proofs are quite short.Comment: 19 page
Decomposition of bounded degree graphs into -free subgraphs
We prove that every graph with maximum degree admits a partition of
its edges into parts (as ) none of which
contains as a subgraph. This bound is sharp up to a constant factor. Our
proof uses an iterated random colouring procedure.Comment: 8 pages; to appear in European Journal of Combinatoric
Embedding large subgraphs into dense graphs
What conditions ensure that a graph G contains some given spanning subgraph
H? The most famous examples of results of this kind are probably Dirac's
theorem on Hamilton cycles and Tutte's theorem on perfect matchings. Perfect
matchings are generalized by perfect F-packings, where instead of covering all
the vertices of G by disjoint edges, we want to cover G by disjoint copies of a
(small) graph F. It is unlikely that there is a characterization of all graphs
G which contain a perfect F-packing, so as in the case of Dirac's theorem it
makes sense to study conditions on the minimum degree of G which guarantee a
perfect F-packing.
The Regularity lemma of Szemeredi and the Blow-up lemma of Komlos, Sarkozy
and Szemeredi have proved to be powerful tools in attacking such problems and
quite recently, several long-standing problems and conjectures in the area have
been solved using these. In this survey, we give an outline of recent progress
(with our main emphasis on F-packings, Hamiltonicity problems and tree
embeddings) and describe some of the methods involved
Bipartite induced density in triangle-free graphs
We prove that any triangle-free graph on vertices with minimum degree at
least contains a bipartite induced subgraph of minimum degree at least
. This is sharp up to a logarithmic factor in . Relatedly, we show
that the fractional chromatic number of any such triangle-free graph is at most
the minimum of and as . This is
sharp up to constant factors. Similarly, we show that the list chromatic number
of any such triangle-free graph is at most as
.
Relatedly, we also make two conjectures. First, any triangle-free graph on
vertices has fractional chromatic number at most
as . Second, any triangle-free
graph on vertices has list chromatic number at most as
.Comment: 20 pages; in v2 added note of concurrent work and one reference; in
v3 added more notes of ensuing work and a result towards one of the
conjectures (for list colouring
The Ramsey Number for 3-Uniform Tight Hypergraph Cycles
Let C(3)n denote the 3-uniform tight cycle, that is, the hypergraph with vertices v1, .â.â., vn and edges v1v2v3, v2v3v4, .â.â., vnâ1vnv1, vnv1v2. We prove that the smallest integer N = N(n) for which every redâblue colouring of the edges of the complete 3-uniform hypergraph with N vertices contains a monochromatic copy of C(3)n is asymptotically equal to 4n/3 if n is divisible by 3, and 2n otherwise. The proof uses the regularity lemma for hypergraphs of Frankl and RĂśdl
Ramsey Goodness and Beyond
In a seminal paper from 1983, Burr and Erdos started the systematic study of
Ramsey numbers of cliques vs. large sparse graphs, raising a number of
problems. In this paper we develop a new approach to such Ramsey problems using
a mix of the Szemeredi regularity lemma, embedding of sparse graphs, Turan type
stability, and other structural results. We give exact Ramsey numbers for
various classes of graphs, solving all but one of the Burr-Erdos problems.Comment: A new reference is adde
- âŚ