Introduction. History of Modern Logic in a New Key

"We like to think of the aim of the book as doing for modern logic what John Corcoran did for the work of George Boole, namely to make sense of and do justice to the idea that Aristotelian syllogistic logic contributed to its creation. More specifically, the chapters show that the period between the nineteenth and early twentieth century saw a parallel development of modern logicians reshaping syllogism and reflections on syllogism shaping modern logic. This might sound odd as it stands in striking contrast to the standard narrative about the history of modern logic, which says that its creation and development happened in spite of, or in direct opposition to, the old logic. W. V. Quine, for one, wrote that Aristotelian logic is to modern logic what the ‘arithmetic of primitive tribes’ is to modern mathematics: not even a scientific predecessor but a ‘pre-scientific fragment’.", p. 1

Modal Hybrid Logic

This is an extended version of the lectures given during the 12-th Conference on Applications of Logic in Philosophy and in the Foundations of Mathematics in Szklarska Poręba (7–11 May 2007). It contains a survey of modal hybrid logic, one of the branches of contemporary modal logic. In the first part a variety of hybrid languages and logics is presented with a discussion of expressivity matters. The second part is devoted to thorough exposition of proof methods for hybrid logics. The main point is to show that application of hybrid logics may remarkably improve the situation in modal proof theory

An Analytic Propositional Proof System on Graphs

In this paper we present a proof system that operates on graphs instead of formulas. Starting from the well-known relationship between formulas and cographs, we drop the cograph-conditions and look at arbitrary undirected) graphs. This means that we lose the tree structure of the formulas corresponding to the cographs, and we can no longer use standard proof theoretical methods that depend on that tree structure. In order to overcome this difficulty, we use a modular decomposition of graphs and some techniques from deep inference where inference rules do not rely on the main connective of a formula. For our proof system we show the admissibility of cut and a generalization of the splitting property. Finally, we show that our system is a conservative extension of multiplicative linear logic with mix, and we argue that our graphs form a notion of generalized connective

A Realizability Interpretation for Intersection and Union Types

International audienceProof-functional logical connectives allow reasoning about the structure of logical proofs, in this way giving to the latter the status of first-class objects. This is in contrast to classical truth-functional con- nectives where the meaning of a compound formula is dependent only on the truth value of its subformulas.In this paper we present a typed lambda calculus, enriched with strong products, strong sums, and a related proof-functional logic. This cal- culus, directly derived from a typed calculus previously defined by two of the current authors, has been proved isomorphic to the well-known Barbanera-Dezani-Ciancaglini-de’Liguoro type assignment system. We present a logic L∩∪ featuring two proof-functional connectives, namely strong conjunction and strong disjunction. We prove the typed calculus to be isomorphic to the logic L∩∪ and we give a realizability semantics using Mints’ realizers [Min89] and a completeness theorem. A prototype implementation is also described

Grammatical structures and logical deductions

The three essays presented here concern natural connections between grammatical derivations and structures provided by certain standard grammar formalisms, on the one hand, and deductions in logical systems, on the other hand. In the first essay we analyse the adequacy of Polish notation for higher-order languages. The Ajdukiewicz algorithm (Ajdukiewicz 1935) is discussed in terms of generalized MP-deductions. We exhibit a failure in Ajdukiewicz’s original version of the algorithm and give a correct one; we prove that generalized MP-deductions have the frontier property, which is essential for the plausibility of Polish notation. The second essay deals with logical systems corresponding to different grammar formalisms, as e.g. Finite State Acceptors, Context-Free Grammars, Categorial Grammars, and others. We show how can logical methods be used to establish certain linguistically significant properties of formal grammars. The third essay discusses the interplay between Natural Deduction proofs in grammar oriented logics and semantic structures expressible by typed lambda terms and combinators

Relating Justification Logic Modality and Type Theory in Curry–Howard Fashion

This dissertation is a work in the intersection of Justification Logic and Curry--Howard Isomorphism. Justification logic is an umbrella of modal logics of knowledge with explicit evidence. Justification logics have been used to tackle traditional problems in proof theory (in relation to Godel\u27s provability) and philosophy (Gettier examples, Russel\u27s barn paradox). The Curry--Howard Isomorphism or proofs-as-programs is an understanding of logic that places logical studies in conjunction with type theory and -- in current developments -- category theory. The point being that understanding a system as a logic, a typed calculus and, a language of a class of categories constitutes a useful discovery that can have many applications. The applications we will be mainly concerned with are type systems for useful programming language constructs. This work is structured in three parts: The first part is a a bird\u27s eye view into my research topics: intuitionistic logic, justified modality and type theory. The relevant systems are introduced syntactically together with main metatheoretic proof techniques which will be useful in the rest of the thesis. The second part features my main contributions. I will propose a modal type system that extends simple type theory (or, isomorphically, intuitionistic propositional logic) with elements of justification logic and will argue about its computational significance. More specifically, I will show that the obtained calculus characterizes certain computational phenomena related to linking (e.g. module mechanisms, foreign function interfaces) that abound in semantics of modern programming languages. I will present full metatheoretic results obtained for this logic/ calculus utilizing techniques from the first part and will provide proofs in the Appendix. The Appendix contains also information about an implementation of our calculus in the metaprogramming framework Makam. Finally, I conclude this work with a small ``outro\u27\u27, where I informally show that the ideas underlying my contributions can be extended in interesting ways

Decision procedures for equality logic with uninterpreted functions

In dit proefschrift presenteren we een aantal technieken om vervulbaarheid (satisfiability) vast te stellen binnen beslisbare delen van de eerste orde logica met gelijkheid. Het doel van dit proefschrift is voornamelijk het ontwikkelen van nieuwe technieken in plaats van het ontwikkelen van een effici¨ente implementatie om vervulbaarheid vast te stellen. Als algemeen logisch raamwerk gebruiken we de eerste orde predikaten logica zonder kwantoren. We beschrijven enkele basisprocedures om vervulbaarheid van propositionele formules vast te stellen: de DP procedure, de DPLL procedure, en een techniek gebaseerd op BDDs. Deze technieken zijn eigenlijk families van algoritmen in plaats van losse algoritmen. Hun gedrag wordt bepaald door een aantal keuzen die ze maken gedurende de uitvoering. We geven een formele beschrijving van resolutie, en we analyseren gedetailleerd de relatie tussen resolutie en DPLL. Het is bekend dat een DPLL bewijs van onvervulbaarheid (refutation) rechtstreeks kan worden getransformeerd naar een resolutie bewijs van onvervulbaarheid met een vergelijkbare lengte. In dit proefschrift wordt een transformatie ge¨introduceerd van zo’n DPLL bewijs naar een resolutie bewijs dat de kortst mogelijke lengte heeft. We presenteren GDPLL, een generalisatie van de DPLL procedure. Deze is bruikbaar voor het vervulbaarheidsprobleem voor beslisbare delen van de eerste orde logica zonder kwantoren. Voldoende eigenschappen worden ge¨identificeerd om de correctheid, de be¨eindiging en de volledigheid van GDPLL te bewijzen. We beschrijven manieren om vervulbaarheid vast te stellen binnen de logica met gelijkheid en niet-ge¨interpreteerde functies (EUF). Dit soort logica is voorgesteld om abstracte hardware ontwerpen te verifi¨eren. Het snel kunnen vaststellen van vervulbaarheid binnen deze logica is belangrijk om dergelijke verificaties te laten slagen. In de afgelopen jaren zijn er verschillende procedures voorgesteld om de vervulbaarheid van dergelijke formules vast te stellen. Wij beschrijven een nieuwe aanpak om vervulbaarheid vast te stellen van formules uit de logica met gelijkheid die in de conjunctieve normaal vorm zijn gegeven. Centraal in deze aanpak staat ´e´en enkele bewijsregel genaamd gelijkheidsresolutie. Voor deze ene regel bewijzen wij correctheid en volledigheid. Op grond van deze regel stellen we een volledige procedure voor om vervulbaarheid van dit soort formules vast te stellen, en we bewijzen de correctheid ervan. Daarnaast presenteren we nog een nieuwe procedure om vervulbaarheid vast te stellen van EUF-formules, gebaseerd op de GDPLL methode. Tot slot breiden we BDDs voor propositionele logica uit naar logica met gelijkheid. We bewijzen dat alle paden in deze uitgebreide BDDs vervulbaar zijn. In een constante hoeveelheid tijd kan vastgesteld worden of de formule een tautologie is, een tegenspraak is, of slechts vervulbaar is