198 research outputs found
Syntactic Interpolation for Tense Logics and Bi-Intuitionistic Logic via Nested Sequents
We provide a direct method for proving Craig interpolation for a range of modal and intuitionistic logics, including those containing a "converse" modality. We demonstrate this method for classical tense logic, its extensions with path axioms, and for bi-intuitionistic logic. These logics do not have straightforward formalisations in the traditional Gentzen-style sequent calculus, but have all been shown to have cut-free nested sequent calculi. The proof of the interpolation theorem uses these calculi and is purely syntactic, without resorting to embeddings, semantic arguments, or interpreted connectives external to the underlying logical language. A novel feature of our proof includes an orthogonality condition for defining duality between interpolants
The Varieties of Ought-implies-Can and Deontic STIT Logic
STIT logic is a prominent framework for the analysis of multi-agent choice-making. In the available deontic extensions of STIT, the principle of Ought-implies-Can (OiC) fulfills a central role. However, in the philosophical literature a variety of alternative
OiC interpretations have been proposed and discussed. This paper provides a modular framework for deontic STIT that accounts for a multitude of OiC readings. In particular, we discuss, compare, and formalize ten such readings. We provide sound and complete sequent-style calculi for all of the various STIT logics accommodating these OiC principles. We formally analyze the resulting logics and discuss how the different OiC principles are logically related. In particular, we propose an endorsement principle describing which OiC readings logically commit one to other OiC readings
Cut-restriction: from cuts to analytic cuts
Cut-elimination is the bedrock of proof theory with a multitude of
applications from computational interpretations to proof analysis. It is also
the starting point for important meta-theoretical investigations including
decidability, complexity, disjunction property, and interpolation.
Unfortunately cut-elimination does not hold for the sequent calculi of most
non-classical logics. It is well-known that the key to applications is the
subformula property (a typical consequence of cut-elimination) rather than
cut-elimination itself. With this in mind we introduce cut-restriction, a
procedure to restrict arbitrary cuts to analytic cuts (when elimination is not
possible). The algorithm applies to all sequent calculi satisfying
language-independent and simple-to-check conditions, and it is obtained by
adapting age-old cut-elimination. Our work encompasses existing results in a
uniform way, and establishes novel analytic subformula properties.Comment: 13 pages, conference preprin
Cut-restriction: from cuts to analytic cuts
Cut-elimination is the bedrock of proof theory with a multitude of applications from computational interpretations to proof analysis. It is also the starting point for important meta-theoretical investigations into decidability, complexity, disjunction property, interpolation, and more. Unfortunately cut-elimination does not hold for the sequent calculi of most non-classical logics. It is well-known that the key to applications is the subformula property (a typical consequence of cut-elimination) rather than cut-elimination itself. With this in mind, we introduce cut-restriction, a procedure to restrict arbitrary cuts to analytic cuts (when elimination is not possible). The algorithm applies to all sequent calculi satisfying language-independent and simple-to-check conditions, and it is obtained by adapting age-old cut-elimination. Our work encompasses existing results in a uniform way, subsumes Gentzen’s cut-elimination, and establishes new analytic cut properties
Towards a Proof Theory of G\"odel Modal Logics
Analytic proof calculi are introduced for box and diamond fragments of basic
modal fuzzy logics that combine the Kripke semantics of modal logic K with the
many-valued semantics of G\"odel logic. The calculi are used to establish
completeness and complexity results for these fragments
On Deriving Nested Calculi for Intuitionistic Logics from Semantic Systems
This paper shows how to derive nested calculi from labelled calculi for propositional intuitionistic logic and first-order intuitionistic logic with constant domains, thus connecting the general results for labelled calculi with the more refined formalism of nested sequents. The extraction of nested calculi from labelled calculi obtains via considerations pertaining to the elimination of structural rules in labelled derivations. Each aspect of the extraction process is motivated and detailed, showing that each nested calculus inherits favorable proof-theoretic properties from its associated labelled calculus
A new calculus for intuitionistic Strong L\"ob logic: strong termination and cut-elimination, formalised
We provide a new sequent calculus that enjoys syntactic cut-elimination and
strongly terminating backward proof search for the intuitionistic Strong L\"ob
logic , an intuitionistic modal logic with a provability
interpretation. A novel measure on sequents is used to prove both the
termination of the naive backward proof search strategy, and the admissibility
of cut in a syntactic and direct way, leading to a straightforward
cut-elimination procedure. All proofs have been formalised in the interactive
theorem prover Coq.Comment: 21-page conference paper + 4-page appendix with proof
Bounded-analytic sequent calculi and embeddings for hypersequent logics
A sequent calculus with the subformula property has long been recognised as a highly favourable starting point for the proof theoretic investigation of a logic. However, most logics of interest cannot be presented using a sequent calculus with the subformula property. In response, many formalisms more intricate than the sequent calculus have been formulated. In this work we identify an alternative: retain the sequent calculus but generalise the subformula property to permit specific axiom substitutions and their subformulas. Our investigation leads to a classification of generalised subformula properties and is applied to infinitely many substructural, intermediate, and modal logics (specifically: those with a cut-free hypersequent calculus). We also develop a complementary perspective on the generalised subformula properties in terms of logical embeddings. This yields new complexity upper bounds for contractive-mingle substructural logics and situates isolated results on the so-called simple substitution property within a general theory
Syntactic Cut-Elimination for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic via Linear Nested Sequents
This paper employs the linear nested sequent framework to design a new
cut-free calculus LNIF for intuitionistic fuzzy logic--the first-order G\"odel
logic characterized by linear relational frames with constant domains. Linear
nested sequents--which are nested sequents restricted to linear
structures--prove to be a well-suited proof-theoretic formalism for
intuitionistic fuzzy logic. We show that the calculus LNIF possesses highly
desirable proof-theoretic properties such as invertibility of all rules,
admissibility of structural rules, and syntactic cut-elimination.Comment: Appended version of the paper "Syntactic Cut-Elimination for
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic via Linear Nested Sequents", accepted to the
International Symposium on Logical Foundations of Computer Science (LFCS
2020
- …