14,162 research outputs found
Generating Property-Directed Potential Invariants By Backward Analysis
This paper addresses the issue of lemma generation in a k-induction-based
formal analysis of transition systems, in the linear real/integer arithmetic
fragment. A backward analysis, powered by quantifier elimination, is used to
output preimages of the negation of the proof objective, viewed as unauthorized
states, or gray states. Two heuristics are proposed to take advantage of this
source of information. First, a thorough exploration of the possible
partitionings of the gray state space discovers new relations between state
variables, representing potential invariants. Second, an inexact exploration
regroups and over-approximates disjoint areas of the gray state space, also to
discover new relations between state variables. k-induction is used to isolate
the invariants and check if they strengthen the proof objective. These
heuristics can be used on the first preimage of the backward exploration, and
each time a new one is output, refining the information on the gray states. In
our context of critical avionics embedded systems, we show that our approach is
able to outperform other academic or commercial tools on examples of interest
in our application field. The method is introduced and motivated through two
main examples, one of which was provided by Rockwell Collins, in a
collaborative formal verification framework.Comment: In Proceedings FTSCS 2012, arXiv:1212.657
Robust Classification for Imprecise Environments
In real-world environments it usually is difficult to specify target
operating conditions precisely, for example, target misclassification costs.
This uncertainty makes building robust classification systems problematic. We
show that it is possible to build a hybrid classifier that will perform at
least as well as the best available classifier for any target conditions. In
some cases, the performance of the hybrid actually can surpass that of the best
known classifier. This robust performance extends across a wide variety of
comparison frameworks, including the optimization of metrics such as accuracy,
expected cost, lift, precision, recall, and workforce utilization. The hybrid
also is efficient to build, to store, and to update. The hybrid is based on a
method for the comparison of classifier performance that is robust to imprecise
class distributions and misclassification costs. The ROC convex hull (ROCCH)
method combines techniques from ROC analysis, decision analysis and
computational geometry, and adapts them to the particulars of analyzing learned
classifiers. The method is efficient and incremental, minimizes the management
of classifier performance data, and allows for clear visual comparisons and
sensitivity analyses. Finally, we point to empirical evidence that a robust
hybrid classifier indeed is needed for many real-world problems.Comment: 24 pages, 12 figures. To be published in Machine Learning Journal.
For related papers, see http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Tom_Fawcett/ROCCH
Relative Convex Hull Determination from Convex Hulls in the Plane
A new algorithm for the determination of the relative convex hull in the
plane of a simple polygon A with respect to another simple polygon B which
contains A, is proposed. The relative convex hull is also known as geodesic
convex hull, and the problem of its determination in the plane is equivalent to
find the shortest curve among all Jordan curves lying in the difference set of
B and A and encircling A. Algorithms solving this problem known from
Computational Geometry are based on the triangulation or similar decomposition
of that difference set. The algorithm presented here does not use such
decomposition, but it supposes that A and B are given as ordered sequences of
vertices. The algorithm is based on convex hull calculations of A and B and of
smaller polygons and polylines, it produces the output list of vertices of the
relative convex hull from the sequence of vertices of the convex hull of A.Comment: 15 pages, 4 figures, Conference paper published. We corrected two
typing errors in Definition 2: has to be defined based on , and
has to be defined based on (not just using ). These errors
appeared in the text of the original conference paper, which also contained
the pseudocode of an algorithm where and appeared as correctly
define
- …