Analysing temporal evolution of interlingual wikipedia article pairs

Wikipedia articles representing an entity or a topic in different language editions evolve independently within the scope of the language-specific user communities. This can lead to different points of views reflected in the articles, as well as complementary and inconsistent information. An analysis of how the information is propagated across the Wikipedia language editions can provide important insights in the article evolution along the temporal and cultural dimensions and support quality control. To facilitate such analysis, we present MultiWiki - a novel web-based user interface that provides an overview of the similarities and differences across the article pairs originating from different language editions on a timeline. MultiWiki enables users to observe the changes in the interlingual article similarity over time and to perform a detailed visual comparison of the article snapshots at a particular time point

Towards Better Understanding Researcher Strategies in Cross-Lingual Event Analytics

With an increasing amount of information on globally important events, there is a growing demand for efficient analytics of multilingual event-centric information. Such analytics is particularly challenging due to the large amount of content, the event dynamics and the language barrier. Although memory institutions increasingly collect event-centric Web content in different languages, very little is known about the strategies of researchers who conduct analytics of such content. In this paper we present researchers' strategies for the content, method and feature selection in the context of cross-lingual event-centric analytics observed in two case studies on multilingual Wikipedia. We discuss the influence factors for these strategies, the findings enabled by the adopted methods along with the current limitations and provide recommendations for services supporting researchers in cross-lingual event-centric analytics.Comment: In Proceedings of the International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 201

Analysing Timelines of National Histories across Wikipedia Editions: A Comparative Computational Approach

Portrayals of history are never complete, and each description inherently exhibits a specific viewpoint and emphasis. In this paper, we aim to automatically identify such differences by computing timelines and detecting temporal focal points of written history across languages on Wikipedia. In particular, we study articles related to the history of all UN member states and compare them in 30 language editions. We develop a computational approach that allows to identify focal points quantitatively, and find that Wikipedia narratives about national histories (i) are skewed towards more recent events (recency bias) and (ii) are distributed unevenly across the continents with significant focus on the history of European countries (Eurocentric bias). We also establish that national historical timelines vary across language editions, although average interlingual consensus is rather high. We hope that this paper provides a starting point for a broader computational analysis of written history on Wikipedia and elsewhere

MultiWiki: interlingual text passage alignment in Wikipedia

In this article we address the problem of text passage alignment across interlingual article pairs in Wikipedia. We develop methods that enable the identification and interlinking of text passages written in different languages and containing overlapping information. Interlingual text passage alignment can enable Wikipedia editors and readers to better understand language-specific context of entities, provide valuable insights in cultural differences and build a basis for qualitative analysis of the articles. An important challenge inthis context is the trade-off between the granularity of the extracted text passages and the precision of the alignment. Whereas short text passages can result in more precise alignment, longer text passages can facilitate a better overview of the differences in an article pair. To better understand these aspects from the user perspective, we conduct a user study at the example of the German, Russian and the English Wikipedia and collect a user-annotated benchmark. Then we propose MultiWiki – a method that adopts an integrated approach to the text passage alignment using semantic similarity measures and greedy algorithms and achieves precise results with respect to the user-defined alignment. MultiWiki demonstration is publicly available and currently supports four language pairs

Translation and the Production of Knowledge in "Wikipedia": Chronicling the Assassination of Boris Nemtsov

Based on a set of articles about the assassination of Russian politician Boris Nemtsov from nine different editions of the encyclopaedia, the article examines the place of translation in Wikipedia and the role it plays in knowledge production. Each of the articles is likely to use a number of different information sources, including other Wikipedia articles that are already in existence, with translation contributing to knowledge production as each new article evolves. The article examines questions of flow, visibility, location, evolution, and point of view to build up a picture of the knowledge development of these interrelated articles

Creation, Enrichment and Application of Knowledge Graphs

The world is in constant change, and so is the knowledge about it. Knowledge-based systems - for example, online encyclopedias, search engines and virtual assistants - are thus faced with the constant challenge of collecting this knowledge and beyond that, to understand it and make it accessible to their users. Only if a knowledge-based system is capable of this understanding - that is, it is capable of more than just reading a collection of words and numbers without grasping their semantics - it can recognise relevant information and make it understandable to its users. The dynamics of the world play a unique role in this context: Events of various kinds which are relevant to different communities are shaping the world, with examples ranging from the coronavirus pandemic to the matches of a local football team. Vital questions arise when dealing with such events: How to decide which events are relevant, and for whom? How to model these events, to make them understood by knowledge-based systems? How is the acquired knowledge returned to the users of these systems? A well-established concept for making knowledge understandable by knowledge-based systems are knowledge graphs, which contain facts about entities (persons, objects, locations, ...) in the form of graphs, represent relationships between these entities and make the facts understandable by means of ontologies. This thesis considers knowledge graphs from three different perspectives: (i) Creation of knowledge graphs: Even though the Web offers a multitude of sources that provide knowledge about the events in the world, the creation of an event-centric knowledge graph requires recognition of such knowledge, its integration across sources and its representation. (ii) Knowledge graph enrichment: Knowledge of the world seems to be infinite, and it seems impossible to grasp it entirely at any time. Therefore, methods that autonomously infer new knowledge and enrich the knowledge graphs are of particular interest. (iii) Knowledge graph interaction: Even having all knowledge of the world available does not have any value in itself; in fact, there is a need to make it accessible to humans. Based on knowledge graphs, systems can provide their knowledge with their users, even without demanding any conceptual understanding of knowledge graphs from them. For this to succeed, means for interaction with the knowledge are required, hiding the knowledge graph below the surface. In concrete terms, I present EventKG - a knowledge graph that represents the happenings in the world in 15 languages - as well as Tab2KG - a method for understanding tabular data and transforming it into a knowledge graph. For the enrichment of knowledge graphs without any background knowledge, I propose HapPenIng, which infers missing events from the descriptions of related events. I demonstrate means for interaction with knowledge graphs at the example of two web-based systems (EventKG+TL and EventKG+BT) that enable users to explore the happenings in the world as well as the most relevant events in the lives of well-known personalities.Die Welt befindet sich im steten Wandel, und mit ihr das Wissen über die Welt. Wissensbasierte Systeme - seien es Online-Enzyklopädien, Suchmaschinen oder Sprachassistenten - stehen somit vor der konstanten Herausforderung, dieses Wissen zu sammeln und darüber hinaus zu verstehen, um es so Menschen verfügbar zu machen. Nur wenn ein wissensbasiertes System in der Lage ist, dieses Verständnis aufzubringen - also zu mehr in der Lage ist, als auf eine unsortierte Ansammlung von Wörtern und Zahlen zurückzugreifen, ohne deren Bedeutung zu erkennen -, kann es relevante Informationen erkennen und diese seinen Nutzern verständlich machen. Eine besondere Rolle spielt hierbei die Dynamik der Welt, die von Ereignissen unterschiedlichster Art geformt wird, die für unterschiedlichste Bevölkerungsgruppe relevant sind; Beispiele hierfür erstrecken sich von der Corona-Pandemie bis hin zu den Spielen lokaler Fußballvereine. Doch stellen sich hierbei bedeutende Fragen: Wie wird die Entscheidung getroffen, ob und für wen derlei Ereignisse relevant sind? Wie sind diese Ereignisse zu modellieren, um von wissensbasierten Systemen verstanden zu werden? Wie wird das angeeignete Wissen an die Nutzer dieser Systeme zurückgegeben? Ein bewährtes Konzept, um wissensbasierten Systemen das Wissen verständlich zu machen, sind Wissensgraphen, die Fakten über Entitäten (Personen, Objekte, Orte, ...) in der Form von Graphen sammeln, Zusammenhänge zwischen diesen Entitäten darstellen, und darüber hinaus anhand von Ontologien verständlich machen. Diese Arbeit widmet sich der Betrachtung von Wissensgraphen aus drei aufeinander aufbauenden Blickwinkeln: (i) Erstellung von Wissensgraphen: Auch wenn das Internet eine Vielzahl an Quellen anbietet, die Wissen über Ereignisse in der Welt bereithalten, so erfordert die Erstellung eines ereigniszentrierten Wissensgraphen, dieses Wissen zu erkennen, miteinander zu verbinden und zu repräsentieren. (ii) Anreicherung von Wissensgraphen: Das Wissen über die Welt scheint schier unendlich und so scheint es unmöglich, dieses je vollständig (be)greifen zu können. Von Interesse sind also Methoden, die selbstständig das vorhandene Wissen erweitern. (iii) Interaktion mit Wissensgraphen: Selbst alles Wissen der Welt bereitzuhalten, hat noch keinen Wert in sich selbst, vielmehr muss dieses Wissen Menschen verfügbar gemacht werden. Basierend auf Wissensgraphen, können wissensbasierte Systeme Nutzern ihr Wissen darlegen, auch ohne von diesen ein konzeptuelles Verständis von Wissensgraphen abzuverlangen. Damit dies gelingt, sind Möglichkeiten der Interaktion mit dem gebotenen Wissen vonnöten, die den genutzten Wissensgraphen unter der Oberfläche verstecken. Konkret präsentiere ich EventKG - einen Wissensgraphen, der Ereignisse in der Welt repräsentiert und in 15 Sprachen verfügbar macht, sowie Tab2KG - eine Methode, um in Tabellen enthaltene Daten anhand von Hintergrundwissen zu verstehen und in Wissensgraphen zu wandeln. Zur Anreicherung von Wissensgraphen ohne weiteres Hintergrundwissen stelle ich HapPenIng vor, das fehlende Ereignisse aus den vorliegenden Beschreibungen ähnlicher Ereignisse inferiert. Interaktionsmöglichkeiten mit Wissensgraphen demonstriere ich anhand zweier web-basierter Systeme (EventKG+TL und EventKG+BT), die Nutzern auf einfache Weise die Exploration von Geschehnissen in der Welt sowie der wichtigsten Ereignisse in den Leben bekannter Persönlichkeiten ermöglichen

On the Mono- and Cross-Language Detection of Text Re-Use and Plagiarism

Barrón Cedeño, LA. (2012). On the Mono- and Cross-Language Detection of Text Re-Use and Plagiarism [Tesis doctoral no publicada]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/16012Palanci

Moving Boundaries in Translation Studies

Translation is in motion. Both translation practice and translation studies (TS) have seen considerable innovation in recent decades, and we are currently witnessing a wealth of new approaches and concepts, some of which refect new translation phenomena, whereas others mirror new scholarly foci. Volunteer translation, crowdsourcing, virtual translator networks, transediting, and translanguaging are only some examples of practices and notions that are emerging on the scene alongside a renewed focus on well-established concepts that have traditionally been considered peripheral to the practice and study of translation: intralingual and intersemiotic translation are cases in point. At the same time, technological innovation and global developments such as the spread of English as a lingua franca are affecting wide areas of translation and, with it, translation studies. These trends are currently pushing or even crossing our traditional understandings of translation (studies) and its boundaries. The question is: how to deal with these developments? Some areas of the translation profession seem to respond by widening its borders, adding new practices such as technical writing, localisation, transcreation, or post-editing to their job portfolios, whereas others seem to be closing ranks. The same trend can be observed in the academic discipline: some branches of translation studies are eager to embrace all new developments under the TS umbrella, whereas others tend to dismiss (some of) them as irrelevant or as merely refecting new names for age-old practices. Translation is in motion. Technological developments, digitalisation and globalisation are among the many factors affecting and changing translation and, with it, translation studies. Moving Boundaries in Translation Studies offers a bird’s-eye view of recent developments and discusses their implications for the boundaries of the discipline. With 15 chapters written by leading translation scholars from around the world, the book analyses new translation phenomena, new practices and tools, new forms of organisation, new concepts and names as well as new scholarly approaches and methods. This is key reading for scholars, researchers and advanced students of translation and interpreting studies. The Open Access version of this book, available at http://www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 licens