20,501 research outputs found
Learning Analogies and Semantic Relations
We present an algorithm for learning from unlabeled text, based on the
Vector Space Model (VSM) of information retrieval, that can solve verbal
analogy questions of the kind found in the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT).
A verbal analogy has the form A:B::C:D, meaning "A is to B as C is to D";
for example, mason:stone::carpenter:wood. SAT analogy questions provide
a word pair, A:B, and the problem is to select the most analogous word
pair, C:D, from a set of five choices. The VSM algorithm correctly
answers 47% of a collection of 374 college-level analogy questions
(random guessing would yield 20% correct). We motivate this research by
relating it to work in cognitive science and linguistics, and by applying
it to a difficult problem in natural language processing, determining
semantic relations in noun-modifier pairs. The problem is to classify a
noun-modifier pair, such as "laser printer", according to the semantic
relation between the noun (printer) and the modifier (laser). We use a
supervised nearest-neighbour algorithm that assigns a class to a given
noun-modifier pair by finding the most analogous noun-modifier pair in
the training data. With 30 classes of semantic relations, on a collection
of 600 labeled noun-modifier pairs, the learning algorithm attains an F
value of 26.5% (random guessing: 3.3%). With 5 classes of semantic
relations, the F value is 43.2% (random: 20%). The performance is
state-of-the-art for these challenging problems
Similarity of Semantic Relations
There are at least two kinds of similarity. Relational similarity is
correspondence between relations, in contrast with attributional similarity,
which is correspondence between attributes. When two words have a high
degree of attributional similarity, we call them synonyms. When two pairs
of words have a high degree of relational similarity, we say that their
relations are analogous. For example, the word pair mason:stone is analogous
to the pair carpenter:wood. This paper introduces Latent Relational Analysis (LRA),
a method for measuring relational similarity. LRA has potential applications in many
areas, including information extraction, word sense disambiguation,
and information retrieval. Recently the Vector Space Model (VSM) of information
retrieval has been adapted to measuring relational similarity,
achieving a score of 47% on a collection of 374 college-level multiple-choice
word analogy questions. In the VSM approach, the relation between a pair of words is
characterized by a vector of frequencies of predefined patterns in a large corpus.
LRA extends the VSM approach in three ways: (1) the patterns are derived automatically
from the corpus, (2) the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) is used to smooth the frequency
data, and (3) automatically generated synonyms are used to explore variations of the
word pairs. LRA achieves 56% on the 374 analogy questions, statistically equivalent to the
average human score of 57%. On the related problem of classifying semantic relations, LRA
achieves similar gains over the VSM
Insights into Analogy Completion from the Biomedical Domain
Analogy completion has been a popular task in recent years for evaluating the
semantic properties of word embeddings, but the standard methodology makes a
number of assumptions about analogies that do not always hold, either in recent
benchmark datasets or when expanding into other domains. Through an analysis of
analogies in the biomedical domain, we identify three assumptions: that of a
Single Answer for any given analogy, that the pairs involved describe the Same
Relationship, and that each pair is Informative with respect to the other. We
propose modifying the standard methodology to relax these assumptions by
allowing for multiple correct answers, reporting MAP and MRR in addition to
accuracy, and using multiple example pairs. We further present BMASS, a novel
dataset for evaluating linguistic regularities in biomedical embeddings, and
demonstrate that the relationships described in the dataset pose significant
semantic challenges to current word embedding methods.Comment: Accepted to BioNLP 2017. (10 pages
Distributional semantics beyond words: Supervised learning of analogy and paraphrase
There have been several efforts to extend distributional semantics beyond
individual words, to measure the similarity of word pairs, phrases, and
sentences (briefly, tuples; ordered sets of words, contiguous or
noncontiguous). One way to extend beyond words is to compare two tuples using a
function that combines pairwise similarities between the component words in the
tuples. A strength of this approach is that it works with both relational
similarity (analogy) and compositional similarity (paraphrase). However, past
work required hand-coding the combination function for different tasks. The
main contribution of this paper is that combination functions are generated by
supervised learning. We achieve state-of-the-art results in measuring
relational similarity between word pairs (SAT analogies and SemEval~2012 Task
2) and measuring compositional similarity between noun-modifier phrases and
unigrams (multiple-choice paraphrase questions)
The Latent Relation Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Experiments
Many AI researchers and cognitive scientists have argued that analogy is the
core of cognition. The most influential work on computational modeling of
analogy-making is Structure Mapping Theory (SMT) and its implementation in the
Structure Mapping Engine (SME). A limitation of SME is the requirement for
complex hand-coded representations. We introduce the Latent Relation Mapping
Engine (LRME), which combines ideas from SME and Latent Relational Analysis
(LRA) in order to remove the requirement for hand-coded representations. LRME
builds analogical mappings between lists of words, using a large corpus of raw
text to automatically discover the semantic relations among the words. We
evaluate LRME on a set of twenty analogical mapping problems, ten based on
scientific analogies and ten based on common metaphors. LRME achieves
human-level performance on the twenty problems. We compare LRME with a variety
of alternative approaches and find that they are not able to reach the same
level of performance.Comment: related work available at http://purl.org/peter.turney
Recommended from our members
Understanding analogical reasoning : viewpoints from psychology and related disciplines
Analogy and metaphor have a long history of study in linguistics, education, philosophy and psychology. Consensus over what analogy is or how analogy functions in language and thought, however, has been elusive. This paper, the first in a two part series, examines these various research traditions, attempting to bring out major lines of agreement over the role of analogy in individual human experience. As well as being a general literature review which may be helpful for newcomers to the study of analogy, this paper attempts to extract from these literatures existing theories, models and concepts which may be interesting or useful for computational studies of analogical reasoning
Human-Level Performance on Word Analogy Questions by Latent Relational Analysis
This paper introduces Latent Relational Analysis (LRA), a method for measuring relational similarity. LRA has potential applications in many areas, including information extraction, word sense disambiguation, machine translation, and information retrieval. Relational similarity is correspondence between relations, in contrast with attributional similarity, which is correspondence between attributes. When two words have a high degree of attributional similarity, we call them synonyms. When two pairs of words have a high degree of relational similarity, we say that their relations are analogous. For example, the word pair mason/stone is analogous to the pair carpenter/wood; the relations between mason and stone are highly similar to the relations between carpenter and wood. Past work on semantic similarity measures has mainly been concerned with attributional similarity. For instance, Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) can measure the degree of similarity between two words, but not between two relations. Recently the Vector Space Model (VSM) of information retrieval has been adapted to the task of measuring relational similarity, achieving a score of 47% on a collection of 374 college-level multiple-choice word analogy questions. In the VSM approach, the relation between a pair of words is characterized by a vector of frequencies of predefined patterns in a large corpus. LRA extends the VSM approach in three ways: (1) the patterns are derived automatically from the corpus (they are not predefined), (2) the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) is used to smooth the frequency data (it is also used this way in LSA), and (3) automatically generated synonyms are used to explore reformulations of the word pairs. LRA achieves 56% on the 374 analogy questions, statistically equivalent to the average human score of 57%. On the related problem of classifying noun-modifier relations, LRA achieves similar gains over the VSM, while using a smaller corpus
From Frequency to Meaning: Vector Space Models of Semantics
Computers understand very little of the meaning of human language. This
profoundly limits our ability to give instructions to computers, the ability of
computers to explain their actions to us, and the ability of computers to
analyse and process text. Vector space models (VSMs) of semantics are beginning
to address these limits. This paper surveys the use of VSMs for semantic
processing of text. We organize the literature on VSMs according to the
structure of the matrix in a VSM. There are currently three broad classes of
VSMs, based on term-document, word-context, and pair-pattern matrices, yielding
three classes of applications. We survey a broad range of applications in these
three categories and we take a detailed look at a specific open source project
in each category. Our goal in this survey is to show the breadth of
applications of VSMs for semantics, to provide a new perspective on VSMs for
those who are already familiar with the area, and to provide pointers into the
literature for those who are less familiar with the field
- …