48,407 research outputs found
SQG-Differential Evolution for difficult optimization problems under a tight function evaluation budget
In the context of industrial engineering, it is important to integrate
efficient computational optimization methods in the product development
process. Some of the most challenging simulation-based engineering design
optimization problems are characterized by: a large number of design variables,
the absence of analytical gradients, highly non-linear objectives and a limited
function evaluation budget. Although a huge variety of different optimization
algorithms is available, the development and selection of efficient algorithms
for problems with these industrial relevant characteristics, remains a
challenge. In this communication, a hybrid variant of Differential Evolution
(DE) is introduced which combines aspects of Stochastic Quasi-Gradient (SQG)
methods within the framework of DE, in order to improve optimization efficiency
on problems with the previously mentioned characteristics. The performance of
the resulting derivative-free algorithm is compared with other state-of-the-art
DE variants on 25 commonly used benchmark functions, under tight function
evaluation budget constraints of 1000 evaluations. The experimental results
indicate that the new algorithm performs excellent on the 'difficult' (high
dimensional, multi-modal, inseparable) test functions. The operations used in
the proposed mutation scheme, are computationally inexpensive, and can be
easily implemented in existing differential evolution variants or other
population-based optimization algorithms by a few lines of program code as an
non-invasive optional setting. Besides the applicability of the presented
algorithm by itself, the described concepts can serve as a useful and
interesting addition to the algorithmic operators in the frameworks of
heuristics and evolutionary optimization and computing
Improved sampling of the pareto-front in multiobjective genetic optimizations by steady-state evolution: a Pareto converging genetic algorithm
Previous work on multiobjective genetic algorithms has been focused on preventing genetic drift and the issue of convergence has been given little attention. In this paper, we present a simple steady-state strategy, Pareto Converging Genetic Algorithm (PCGA), which naturally samples the solution space and ensures population advancement towards the Pareto-front. PCGA eliminates the need for sharing/niching and thus minimizes heuristically chosen parameters and procedures. A systematic approach based on histograms of rank is introduced for assessing convergence to the Pareto-front, which, by definition, is unknown in most real search problems.
We argue that there is always a certain inheritance of genetic material belonging to a population, and there is unlikely to be any significant gain beyond some point; a stopping criterion where terminating the computation is suggested. For further encouraging diversity and competition, a nonmigrating island model may optionally be used; this approach is particularly suited to many difficult (real-world) problems, which have a tendency to get stuck at (unknown) local minima. Results on three benchmark problems are presented and compared with those of earlier approaches. PCGA is found to produce diverse sampling of the Pareto-front without niching and with significantly less computational effort
Scalarizing Functions in Bayesian Multiobjective Optimization
Scalarizing functions have been widely used to convert a multiobjective
optimization problem into a single objective optimization problem. However,
their use in solving (computationally) expensive multi- and many-objective
optimization problems in Bayesian multiobjective optimization is scarce.
Scalarizing functions can play a crucial role on the quality and number of
evaluations required when doing the optimization. In this article, we study and
review 15 different scalarizing functions in the framework of Bayesian
multiobjective optimization and build Gaussian process models (as surrogates,
metamodels or emulators) on them. We use expected improvement as infill
criterion (or acquisition function) to update the models. In particular, we
compare different scalarizing functions and analyze their performance on
several benchmark problems with different number of objectives to be optimized.
The review and experiments on different functions provide useful insights when
using and selecting a scalarizing function when using a Bayesian multiobjective
optimization method
Inheritance-Based Diversity Measures for Explicit Convergence Control in Evolutionary Algorithms
Diversity is an important factor in evolutionary algorithms to prevent
premature convergence towards a single local optimum. In order to maintain
diversity throughout the process of evolution, various means exist in
literature. We analyze approaches to diversity that (a) have an explicit and
quantifiable influence on fitness at the individual level and (b) require no
(or very little) additional domain knowledge such as domain-specific distance
functions. We also introduce the concept of genealogical diversity in a broader
study. We show that employing these approaches can help evolutionary algorithms
for global optimization in many cases.Comment: GECCO '18: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, 2018,
Kyoto, Japa
Fast calculation of multiobjective probability of improvement and expected improvement criteria for Pareto optimization
The use of surrogate based optimization (SBO) is widely spread in engineering design to reduce the number of computational expensive simulations. However, "real-world" problems often consist of multiple, conflicting objectives leading to a set of competitive solutions (the Pareto front). The objectives are often aggregated into a single cost function to reduce the computational cost, though a better approach is to use multiobjective optimization methods to directly identify a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, which can be used by the designer to make more efficient design decisions (instead of weighting and aggregating the costs upfront). Most of the work in multiobjective optimization is focused on multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs). While MOEAs are well-suited to handle large, intractable design spaces, they typically require thousands of expensive simulations, which is prohibitively expensive for the problems under study. Therefore, the use of surrogate models in multiobjective optimization, denoted as multiobjective surrogate-based optimization, may prove to be even more worthwhile than SBO methods to expedite the optimization of computational expensive systems. In this paper, the authors propose the efficient multiobjective optimization (EMO) algorithm which uses Kriging models and multiobjective versions of the probability of improvement and expected improvement criteria to identify the Pareto front with a minimal number of expensive simulations. The EMO algorithm is applied on multiple standard benchmark problems and compared against the well-known NSGA-II, SPEA2 and SMS-EMOA multiobjective optimization methods
- …