Progressively interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization

A complete optimization procedure for a multi-objective problem essentially comprises of search and decision making. Depending upon how the search and decision making task is integrated, algorithms can be classified into various categories. Following `a decision making after search' approach, which is common with evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms, requires to produce all the possible alternatives before a decision can be taken. This, with the intricacies involved in producing the entire Pareto-front, is not a wise approach for high objective problems. Rather, for such kind of problems, the most preferred point on the front should be the target. In this study we propose and evaluate algorithms where search and decision making tasks work in tandem and the most preferred solution is the outcome. For the two tasks to work simultaneously, an interaction of the decision maker with the algorithm is necessary, therefore, preference information from the decision maker is accepted periodically by the algorithm and progress towards the most preferred point is made. Two different progressively interactive procedures have been suggested in the dissertation which can be integrated with any existing evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithm to improve its effectiveness in handling high objective problems by making it capable to accept preference information at the intermediate steps of the algorithm. A number of high objective un-constrained as well as constrained problems have been successfully solved using the procedures. One of the less explored and difficult domains, i.e., bilevel multiobjective optimization has also been targeted and a solution methodology has been proposed. Initially, the bilevel multi-objective optimization problem has been solved by developing a hybrid bilevel evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithm. Thereafter, the progressively interactive procedure has been incorporated in the algorithm leading to an increased accuracy and savings in computational cost. The efficacy of using a progressively interactive approach for solving difficult multi-objective problems has, therefore, further been justifie

Light beam search based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms

For the past decade or so, evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) methodologies have earned wide popularity for solving complex practical optimization problems, simply due to their ability to find a representative set of Pareto-optimal solutions for mostly two, three, and some extent to four and five-objective optimization problems. Recently, emphasis has been made in addressing the decision-making activities in arriving at a single preferred solution. The multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) literature offers a number of possibilities for such a task involving user preferences which can be supplied in different forms. This paper presents an interactive methodology for finding a preferred set of solutions, instead of the complete Pareto-optimal frontier, by incorporating preference information of the decision maker. Particularly, we borrow the concept of light beam search and combine it with the NSGA-II procedure. The working of this procedure has been demonstrated on a set of test problems and on engineering design problems having two to ten objectives, where the obtained solutions are found to match with the true Pareto-optimal solutions. The results highlight the utility of this approach towards eventually facilitating a better and more reliable optimization-cum-decision-making task

A review of Nadir point estimation procedures using evolutionary approaches: a tale of dimensionality reduction

Estimation of the nadir objective vector is an important task, particularly for multi-objective optimization problems having more than two conflicting objectives. Along with the ideal point, nadir point can be used to normalize the objectives so that multi-objective optimization algorithms can be used more reliably. The knowledge of the nadir point is also a pre-requisite to many multiple criteria decision making methodologies.Moreover, nadir point is useful for an aid in interactive methodologies and visualization softwares catered for multi-objective optimization. However, the computation of exact nadir point formore than two objectives is not an easy matter, simply because nadir point demands the knowledge of extreme Paretooptimal solutions. In the past few years, researchers have proposed several nadir point estimation procedures using evolutionary optimization methodologies. In this paper, we review the past studies and reveal an interesting chronicle of events in this direction. To make the estimation procedure computationally faster and more accurate, the methodologies were refined one after the other by mainly focusing on increasingly lower dimensional subset of Pareto-optimal solutions. Simulation results on a number of numerical test problems demonstrate better efficacy of the approach which aims to find only the extreme Pareto-optimal points compared to its higher-dimensional counterparts

Ergonomic Chair Design by Fusing Qualitative and Quantitative Criteria using Interactive Genetic Algorithms

This paper emphasizes the necessity of formally bringing qualitative and quantitative criteria of ergonomic design together, and provides a novel complementary design framework with this aim. Within this framework, different design criteria are viewed as optimization objectives; and design solutions are iteratively improved through the cooperative efforts of computer and user. The framework is rooted in multi-objective optimization, genetic algorithms and interactive user evaluation. Three different algorithms based on the framework are developed, and tested with an ergonomic chair design problem. The parallel and multi-objective approaches show promising results in fitness convergence, design diversity and user satisfaction metrics

Interactive Decomposition Multi-Objective Optimization via Progressively Learned Value Functions

Decomposition has become an increasingly popular technique for evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO). A decomposition-based EMO algorithm is usually designed to approximate a whole Pareto-optimal front (PF). However, in practice, the decision maker (DM) might only be interested in her/his region of interest (ROI), i.e., a part of the PF. Solutions outside that might be useless or even noisy to the decision-making procedure. Furthermore, there is no guarantee to find the preferred solutions when tackling many-objective problems. This paper develops an interactive framework for the decomposition-based EMO algorithm to lead a DM to the preferred solutions of her/his choice. It consists of three modules, i.e., consultation, preference elicitation and optimization. Specifically, after every several generations, the DM is asked to score a few candidate solutions in a consultation session. Thereafter, an approximated value function, which models the DM's preference information, is progressively learned from the DM's behavior. In the preference elicitation session, the preference information learned in the consultation module is translated into the form that can be used in a decomposition-based EMO algorithm, i.e., a set of reference points that are biased toward to the ROI. The optimization module, which can be any decomposition-based EMO algorithm in principle, utilizes the biased reference points to direct its search process. Extensive experiments on benchmark problems with three to ten objectives fully demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method for finding the DM's preferred solutions.Comment: 25 pages, 18 figures, 3 table

A bi-objective genetic algorithm approach to risk mitigation in project scheduling

A problem of risk mitigation in project scheduling is formulated as a bi-objective optimization problem, where the expected makespan and the expected total cost are both to be minimized. The expected total cost is the sum of four cost components: overhead cost, activity execution cost, cost of reducing risks and penalty cost for tardiness. Risks for activities are predefined. For each risk at an activity, various levels are defined, which correspond to the results of different preventive measures. Only those risks with a probable impact on the duration of the related activity are considered here. Impacts of risks are not only accounted for through the expected makespan but are also translated into cost and thus have an impact on the expected total cost. An MIP model and a heuristic solution approach based on genetic algorithms (GAs) is proposed. The experiments conducted indicate that GAs provide a fast and effective solution approach to the problem. For smaller problems, the results obtained by the GA are very good. For larger problems, there is room for improvement