Performance Analysis of Channel Extrapolation in FDD Massive MIMO Systems

Channel estimation for the downlink of frequency division duplex (FDD) massive MIMO systems is well known to generate a large overhead as the amount of training generally scales with the number of transmit antennas in a MIMO system. In this paper, we consider the solution of extrapolating the channel frequency response from uplink pilot estimates to the downlink frequency band, which completely removes the training overhead. We first show that conventional estimators fail to achieve reasonable accuracy. We propose instead to use high-resolution channel estimation. We derive theoretical lower bounds (LB) for the mean squared error (MSE) of the extrapolated channel. Assuming that the paths are well separated, the LB is simplified in an expression that gives considerable physical insight. It is then shown that the MSE is inversely proportional to the number of receive antennas while the extrapolation performance penalty scales with the square of the ratio of the frequency offset and the training bandwidth. The channel extrapolation performance is validated through numeric simulations and experimental measurements taken in an anechoic chamber. Our main conclusion is that channel extrapolation is a viable solution for FDD massive MIMO systems if accurate system calibration is performed and favorable propagation conditions are present.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1902.0684

Relaying systems with reciprocity mismatch : impact analysis and calibration

Cooperative beamforming can provide significant performance improvement for relaying systems with the help of the channel state information (CSI). In time-division duplexing (TDD) mode, the estimated CSI will deteriorate due to the reciprocity mismatch. In this work, we examine the impact and the calibration of the reciprocity mismatch in relaying systems. To evaluate the impact of the reciprocity mismatch for all devices, the closed-form expression of the achievable rate is first derived. Then, we analyze the performance loss caused by the reciprocity mismatch at sources, relays, and destinations respectively to show that the mismatch at relays dominates the impact. To compensate the performance loss, a two-stage calibration scheme is proposed for relays. Specifically, relays perform the intra-calibration based on circuits independently. Further, the inter-calibration based on the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) codebook is operated to improve the calibration performance by cooperation transmission, which has never been considered in previous work. Finally, we derive the achievable rate after relays perform the proposed reciprocity calibration scheme and investigate the impact of estimation errors on the system performance. Simulation results are presented to verify the analytical results and to show the performance of the proposed calibration approach

Massive MIMO Performance - TDD Versus FDD: What Do Measurements Say?

Downlink beamforming in Massive MIMO either relies on uplink pilot measurements - exploiting reciprocity and TDD operation, or on the use of a predetermined grid of beams with user equipments reporting their preferred beams, mostly in FDD operation. Massive MIMO in its originally conceived form uses the first strategy, with uplink pilots, whereas there is currently significant commercial interest in the second, grid-of-beams. It has been analytically shown that in isotropic scattering (independent Rayleigh fading) the first approach outperforms the second. Nevertheless there remains controversy regarding their relative performance in practice. In this contribution, the performances of these two strategies are compared using measured channel data at 2.6 GHz.Comment: Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 31/Mar/201

Efficient DSP and Circuit Architectures for Massive MIMO: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions

Massive MIMO is a compelling wireless access concept that relies on the use of an excess number of base-station antennas, relative to the number of active terminals. This technology is a main component of 5G New Radio (NR) and addresses all important requirements of future wireless standards: a great capacity increase, the support of many simultaneous users, and improvement in energy efficiency. Massive MIMO requires the simultaneous processing of signals from many antenna chains, and computational operations on large matrices. The complexity of the digital processing has been viewed as a fundamental obstacle to the feasibility of Massive MIMO in the past. Recent advances on system-algorithm-hardware co-design have led to extremely energy-efficient implementations. These exploit opportunities in deeply-scaled silicon technologies and perform partly distributed processing to cope with the bottlenecks encountered in the interconnection of many signals. For example, prototype ASIC implementations have demonstrated zero-forcing precoding in real time at a 55 mW power consumption (20 MHz bandwidth, 128 antennas, multiplexing of 8 terminals). Coarse and even error-prone digital processing in the antenna paths permits a reduction of consumption with a factor of 2 to 5. This article summarizes the fundamental technical contributions to efficient digital signal processing for Massive MIMO. The opportunities and constraints on operating on low-complexity RF and analog hardware chains are clarified. It illustrates how terminals can benefit from improved energy efficiency. The status of technology and real-life prototypes discussed. Open challenges and directions for future research are suggested.Comment: submitted to IEEE transactions on signal processin

Correctly Modeling TX and RX Chain in (Distributed) Massive MIMO -- New Fundamental Insights on Coherency

This letter shows that the TX and RX models commonly used in literature for downlink (distributed) massive MIMO are inaccurate, leading also to inaccurate conclusions. In particular, the Local Oscillator (LO) effect should be modeled as $+\varphi$ in the transmitter chain and $-\varphi$ in the receiver chain, i.e., different signs. A common misconception in literature is to use the same sign for both chains. By correctly modeling TX and RX chain, one realizes that the LO phases are included in the reciprocity calibration and whenever the LO phases drift apart, a new reciprocity calibration becomes necessary (the same applies to time drifts). Thus, free-running LOs and the commonly made assumption of perfect reciprocity calibration (to enable blind DL channel estimation) are both not that useful, as they would require too much calibration overhead. Instead, the LOs at the base stations should be locked and relative reciprocity calibration in combination with downlink demodulation reference symbols should be employed