Advances in wireless community networks with the community-lab testbed

Beyond traditional telecom providers, citizens and organizations pool their own resources and coordinate in order to build local network infrastructures to address the digital divide in many parts of the world. These crowdsourced network infrastructures can be self-organized and shared by a community for the collective benefit of its members. Several of these networks have developed open, free, and neutral agreements, and are governed as a common-pool resource: community networks. These are built using a variety of commodity wireless hardware (e.g., Wi-Fi long-range point-to-point links, Wi-Fi and GSM access points, and mesh networks), sometimes optical fiber links, heterogeneous nodes, routing protocols, and applications. A group of researchers, developers, and community networks developed the Community-Lab testbed, and for the last five years have worked together to overcome obstacles, improve the technologies, tools, and operational models being used, as well as model best practices for more effective and sustainable community networks. This article presents the challenges for experimentation, the testbeds built, results, lessons learned, and the impact of that work to place wireless community networks as one sustainable way toward an Internet accessible to all.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Enabling individually entrusted routing security for open and decentralized community networks

Routing in open and decentralized networks relies on cooperation. However, the participation of unknown nodes and node administrators pursuing heterogeneous trust and security goals is a challenge. Community-mesh networks are good examples of such environments due to their open structure, decentralized management, and ownership. As a result, existing community networks are vulnerable to various attacks and are seriously challenged by the obligation to find consensus on the trustability of participants within an increasing user size and diversity. We propose a practical and novel solution enabling a secured but decentralized trust management. This work presents the design and analysis of securely-entrusted multi-topology routing (SEMTOR), a set of routing-protocol mechanisms that enable the cryptographically secured negotiation and establishment of concurrent and individually trusted routing topologies for infrastructure-less networks without relying on any central management. The proposed mechanisms have been implemented, tested, and evaluated for their correctness and performance to exclude non-trusted nodes from the network. Respective safety and liveness properties that are guaranteed by our protocol have been identified and proven with formal reasoning. Benchmarking results, based on our implementation as part of the BMX7 routing protocol and tested on real and minimal (OpenWRT, 10 Euro) routers, qualify the behaviour, performance, and scalability of our approach, supporting networks with hundreds of nodes despite the use of strong asymmetric cryptography.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Cooperation in open, decentralized, and heterogeneous computer networks

Community Networks (CN) are naturally open and decentralized structures, that grow organically with the addition of heterogeneous network devices, contributed and configured as needed by their participants. The continuous growth in popularity and dissemination of CNs in recent years has raised the perception of a mature and sustainable model for the provisioning of networking services. However, because such infrastructures include uncontrolled entities with non delimited responsibilities, every single network entity does indeed represent a potential single-point of failure that can stop the entire network from working, and that no other entity can prevent or even circumvent. Given the open and decentralized nature of CNs, that brings together individuals and organizations with different and even conflicting economic, political, and technical interests, the achievement of no more than basic consensus on the correctness of all network nodes is challenging. In such environment, the lack of self-determination for CN participants in terms of control and security of routing can be regarded as an obstacle for growth or even as a risk of collapse. To address this problem we first consider deployments of existing Wireless CN and we analyze their technology, characteristics, and performance. We perform an experimental evaluation of a production 802.11an Wireless CN, and compare to studies of other Wireless CN deployments in the literature. We compare experimentally obtained throughput traces with path-capacity calculations based on well-known conflict graph models. We observe that in the majority of cases the path chosen by the employed BMX6 routing protocol corresponds with the best identified path in our model. We analyze monitoring and interaction shortcomings of CNs and address these with Network Characterization Tool (NCT), a novel tool that allows users to assess network state and performance, and improve their quality of experience by individually modifying the routing parameters of their devices. We also evaluate performance outcomes when different routing policies are in use. Routing protocols provide self-management mechanisms that allow the continuous operation of a Community Mesh Network (CMN). We focus on three widely used proactive mesh routing protocols and their implementations: BMX6, OLSR, and Babel. We describe the core idea behind these protocols and study the implications of these in terms of scalability, performance, and stability by exposing them to typical but challenging network topologies and scenarios. Our results show the relative merits, costs, and limitations of the three protocols. Built upon the studied characteristics of typical CN deployments, their requirements on open and decentralized cooperation, and the potential controversy on the trustiness of particular components of a network infrastructure, we propose and evaluate SEMTOR, a novel routing-protocol that can satisfy these demands. SEMTOR allows the verifiable and undeniable definition and distributed application of individually trusted topologies for routing traffic towards each node. One unique advantage of SEMTOR is that it does not require a global consensus on the trustiness of any node and thus preserves cooperation among nodes with even oppositional defined trust specification. This gives each node admin the freedom to individually define the subset, and the resulting sub-topology, from the whole set of participating nodes that he considers sufficiently trustworthy to meet their security, data-delivery objectives and concerns. The proposed mechanisms have been realized as a usable and open-source implementation called BMX7, as successor of BMX6. We have evaluated its scalability, contributed robustness, and security. These results show that the usage of SEMTOR for securing trusted routing topologies is feasible, even when executed on real and very cheap (10 Euro, Linux SoC) routers as commonly used in Community Mesh Networks.Las Redes Comunitarias (CNs) son estructuras de naturaleza abierta y descentralizada, que crecen orgánicamente con la adición de dispositivos de red heterogéneos que aportan y configuran sus participantes según sea necesario. Sin embargo, debido a que estas infraestructuras incluyen entidades con responsabilidades poco delimitadas, cada entidad puede representar un punto de fallo que puede impedir que la red funcione y que ninguna otra entidad pueda prevenir o eludir. Dada la naturaleza abierta y descentralizada de las CNs, que agrupa individuos y organizaciones con diferentes e incluso contrapuestos intereses económicos, políticos y técnicos, conseguir poco más que un consenso básico sobre los nodos correctos en la red puede ser un reto. En este entorno, la falta de autodeterminación para los participantes de una CN en cuanto a control y seguridad del encaminamiento puede considerarse un obstáculo para el crecimiento o incluso un riesgo de colapso. Para abordar este problema consideramos las implementaciones de redes comunitarias inalámbricas (WCN) y se analiza su tecnología, características y desempeño. Realizamos una evaluación experimental de una WCN establecida y se compara con estudios de otros despliegues. Comparamos las trazas de rendimiento experimentales con cálculos de la capacidad de los caminos basados en modelos bien conocidos del grafo. Se observa que en la mayoría de los casos el camino elegido por el protocolo de encaminamiento BMX6 corresponde con el mejor camino identificado en nuestro modelo. Analizamos las limitaciones de monitorización e interacción en CNs y los tratamos con NCT, una nueva herramienta que permite evaluar el estado y rendimiento de la red, y mejorar la calidad de experiencia modificando los parámetros de sus dispositivos individuales. También evaluamos el rendimiento resultante para diferentes políticas de encaminamiento. Los protocolos de encaminamiento proporcionan mecanismos de autogestión que hacen posible el funcionamiento continuo de una red comunitaria mesh (CMN). Nos centramos en tres protocolos de encaminamiento proactivos para redes mesh ampliamente utilizados y sus implementaciones: BMX6, OLSR y Babel. Se describe la idea central de estos protocolos y se estudian la implicaciones de éstos en términos de escalabilidad, rendimiento y estabilidad al exponerlos a topologías y escenarios de red típicos pero exigentes. Nuestros resultados muestran los méritos, costes y limitaciones de los tres protocolos. A partir de las características analizadas en despliegues típicos de redes comunitarias, y de las necesidades en cuanto a cooperación abierta y descentralizada, y la esperable divergencia sobre la confiabilidad en ciertos componentes de la infraestructura de red, proponemos y evaluamos SEMTOR, un nuevo protocolo de encaminamiento que puede satisfacer estas necesidades. SEMTOR permite definir de forma verificable e innegable, así como aplicar de forma distribuida, topologías de confianza individualizadas para encaminar tráfico hacia cada nodo. Una ventaja única de SEMTOR es que no precisa de consenso global sobre la confianza en cualquier nodo y por tanto preserva la cooperación entre los nodos, incluso con especificaciones de confianza definidas por oposición. Esto proporciona a cada administrador de nodo la libertad para definir el subconjunto, y la sub-topología resultante, entre el conjunto de todos los nodos participantes que considere dignos de suficiente confianza para cumplir con su objetivo y criterio de seguridad y entrega de datos. Los mecanismos propuestos se han realizado en forma de una implementación utilizable de código abierto llamada BMX7. Se ha evaluado su escalabilidad, robustez y seguridad. Estos resultados demuestran que el uso de SEMTOR para asegurar topologías de encaminamiento de confianza es factible, incluso cuando se ejecuta en routers reales y muy baratos utilizados de forma habitual en WCN.Postprint (published version

Experimental evaluation of a wireless community mesh network

Nowadays there are inexpensive WiFi devices that have fostered the deployment of wireless communities. Well known routing protocols used in the Internet do not fit well to time varying characteristic of wireless networks. This has motivated an intensive research on routing protocols for wireless mesh networks. At this time there are a number of mature and stable implementations that are being deployed in production networks. In this paper we focus on the experimental evaluation of a production Wireless Mesh network being deployed in a testbed at Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) and a quarter of the city of Barcelona, Spain. To our best knowledge, this is the first paper where a production community wireless network using 802.11an is analyzed.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft